Many companies are only beginning to grapple with the United
States' export control implications of "cloud
computing," a method of using the Internet to access
third-party information technology resources for using and
developing software applications and for obtaining storage,
processing, and bandwidth resources. Cloud computing providers
offer various services, including webmail, back-up storage
capacity, and tools for software development to users seeking to
outsource selected information technology functions, facilitate
ease of data access, and/or collaborate on software and technology
Cloud computing, like any activity using remote computing
access, might involve technology and software exports, but certain
aspects of cloud computing – for example, users not
always being aware of where their data is being stored in the cloud
– implicate U.S. export control regulations in unique
ways. "U.S. Export Controls and Cloud Computing," an
article written by Hogan Lovells US LLP lawyer Brian Curran,
highlights some of the key cloud computing issues that arise under
the Export Administration Regulations and outlines compliance
measures that companies might consider if they are engaged in or
are considering cloud computing. To read the full article, please
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
On 23 January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to withdraw the United States from the Trans Pacific Partnership. What's left for those companies interested in doing business in the country? Our local expert explains.
In the fourth quarter of 2016 and continuing up to the eve of Inauguration Day in January, the Obama Administration continued to pursue its policies, lifting the economic and financial sanctions against Burma and Sudan.
As every individual and entity concerned was also made the subject of secondary sanctions, the crucial effect is that both U.S. and non-U.S. companies and individuals can be penalized and sanctioned for dealing with the designated parties.
On January 31, 2017, Acting Chairman of the SEC, Michael S. Piwowar, issued two statements calling for comments on the SEC's enforcement of the conflict minerals reporting requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).