In May, the House of Representatives passed legislation (Section
413 of H.R. 4213) that would subject non-wage earnings of certain S
corporation shareholders to the self-employment tax for the first
time. This proposed legislation is intended to prevent service
professionals from routing their income through an S corporation to
avoid paying Social Security and Medicare taxes.
Current Law Excludes Certain Income from Payroll Tax
The Internal Revenue Service currently uses a reasonable
compensation standard to ensure S corporation shareholders pay the
correct amount of self-employment taxes. The excess earnings, after
payment of the reasonable compensation, is taxable to the
shareholders as ordinary income but is not subjected to Social
Security and Medicare taxes. These non-wage earnings can either be
distributed among the shareholders or retained by the corporation
for future growth.
Proposed Bill Subjects Non-Wage Income to Payroll Tax
The proposed bill would increase the self-employment taxes paid
by the owners of S corporations that engage in professional
services. The provision applies to service businesses or an S
corporation that is a partner in a professional service business.
Affected businesses could include doctors, dentists, consultants,
attorneys and many others.
The reason for the proposed change is to prevent professionals
from forming S corporations to avoid self-employment taxes. Under
current law, the earnings of sole-proprietorships and partnerships
are already subject to payroll taxes, while S corporation earnings
To soften the bill, Democratic leaders have added a proposed
test to help determine which S corporation owners would be required
to pay the self-employment tax. Under this test, the additional tax
will apply only when 80% or more of the S corporation's income
is principally based on the reputation and skill of three or fewer
individuals. Many commentators criticize this test as unworkable
and believe it will lead to conflict and haggling between the IRS,
taxpayers and their accountants.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Cayman Islands investment entities are currently subject to three separate regimes relating to financial account information reporting: U.S. FATCA, U.K. FATCA and the OECD Common Reporting Standard (CRS).
In a statement issued on March 30th, the U.S. Treasury Department announced that it will soon be issuing proposed regulations that will require foreign-owned, single-member LLCs to disclose to the IRS their beneficial owners.
Last month in this blog, we described five ways to be diligent about documenting charitable gifts of cash or out-of-pocket expenses to preserve your tax deduction. But what about gifts of property – does giving something other than cash change the taxpayer's responsibilities? According to the tax regulations, the answer is no and yes.
One of the most publicized and long-awaited business provisions contained in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, P.L. 103-66, 107 Stat. 312 (1993) (the "1993 Act") was section 197 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), which governs the tax treatment of acquired intangible assets. However, section 197 cannot be analyzed in isolation. Since it comes into play whenever there is an allocation of consideration to an amortizable section 197 intangible, a basic understanding of
President Barack Obama signed the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA) which makes permanent the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple or discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce established by the Internet Tax Freedom Act.