UK: Research in Motion UK Limited v Motorola Inc [2010] EWHC 288 (Pat) 3 Feb 2010

Last Updated: 12 April 2010
Article by Nick Beckett and David Sant

Summary

Two important issues were addressed in this patent case. In respect of patent claim construction the court found that a key feature of the alleged invention was not disclosed at all in the patent and confirmed the inappropriateness of "imaginative reconstruction" previously discussed in Hewlett Packard GmbH v Waters Corp [2002] IP&T. The judgement also provides a basis for non-published documents, such as an e-mail, being used as evidence relating to the scope of the common general knowledge possessed by a person skilled in the art.

To view the article in full, please see below:



Full Article

Summary

Two important issues were addressed in this patent case. In respect of patent claim construction the court found that a key feature of the alleged invention was not disclosed at all in the patent and confirmed the inappropriateness of "imaginative reconstruction" previously discussed in Hewlett Packard GmbH v Waters Corp [2002] IP&T. The judgement also provides a basis for non-published documents, such as an e-mail, being used as evidence relating to the scope of the common general knowledge possessed by a person skilled in the art.

Facts

Motorola brought an infringement action against Research in Motion ("RIM") in respect of Motorola's patent EP(UK)0818009 (the "009 Patent") entitled "Message Communication System". The technology in question related to wireless radio communication process in which a user can control a mobile user device based on commands translated into a subscriber device readable language at a fixed messaging gateway.

RIM's Blackberry Enterprise Solution ("BES") and Blackberry Internet Solution ("BIS") allow retrieval of e-mail from a mail server, identifies the mobile network of the intended recipient and sends internet protocol version to the network for forwarding to the recipient. Motorola alleged that BES and BIS both infringed Claim 1 of the 009 Patent, which the court cited as:

1. A method of operating a messaging gateway system;

2. operable to receive messages from remote messaging system;

3. and to construct transmittable messages including portions of the messages received from the remote messaging system, the method characterised by the messaging gateway system;

4. receiving a set of commands from a wireless subscriber device using an RF transmission system;

5. translating the set of commands into a protocol understood by the remote messaging system; and

6. transmitting the translated commands to the remote messaging system such that a user of the subscriber device can control operation of the remote messaging system utilising commands transmitted to the remote messaging system.

RIM denied infringement and counterclaimed for invalidity. They cited both prior art documents and documents supporting their position on the common general knowledge of the skilled person.

The dispute related primarily to application level command protocol translation, this feature being found to be the feature distinguishing the alleged invention from RIM's cited prior art.

Held

Construction and Disclosure

Arnold J applied the Kirin-Amgen/Technip rules of construction to determine what the skilled person would have understood the proprietor to have intended, given the formulation of the claim.

Unusually, the parties disputed what was disclosed by the 009 patent, especially in relation to the disclosure of application level command translation, which Motorola argued was encompassed by the definition at feature [5], and that this feature represented "a new way of thinking". Arnold J cited Hewlett Packard GmbH v Waters Corp [2002] IP&T which said "imaginative reconstruction" of a disputed patent was inappropriate. He found in favour of RIM, stating that the patent did not state at which level the translation occurred and that application level command translation was not disclosed at all by the 009 patent.

Infringement

Patent infringement is governed by S60 of the Patents Act 1977, subsections (1)(2) stating:

(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person infringes a patent for an invention if, but only if, while the patent is in force, he does any of the following things in the United Kingdom in relation to the invention without the consent of the proprietor of the patent, that is to say -

(a) where the invention is a product, he makes, disposes of, offers to dispose of, uses or imports the product or keeps it whether for disposal or otherwise; [product inventions]

(b) where the invention is a process, he uses the process or he offers it for use in the United Kingdom when he knows, or it is obvious to a reasonable person in the circumstances, that its use there without the consent of the proprietor would be an infringement of the patent; [process inventions]

(c) where the invention is a process, he disposes of, offers to dispose of, uses or imports any product obtained directly by means of that process or keeps any such product whether for disposal or otherwise. [product-by-process inventions]

(2) Subject to the following provisions of this section, a person (other than the proprietor of the patent) also infringes a patent for an invention if, while the patent is in force and without the consent of the proprietor, he supplies or offers to supply in the United Kingdom a person other than a licensee or other person entitled to work the invention with any of the means, relating to an essential element of the invention, for putting the invention into effect when he knows, or it is obvious to a reasonable person in the circumstances, that those means are suitable for putting, and are intended to put, the invention into effect in the United Kingdom. [(intention to) put invention into effect by offering means relating to essential element of invention]

As the disputed claim was a method claim infringement could occur under sections 60(1)(b) or (2). Arnold J found that, if Motorola's construction of the claim had been correct, then the claim would have by infringed by RIM's BES arrangement under s60(1)(b), but not by the BIS arrangement, as the server in the BIS arrangement was located in Canada, not the UK.

On S60(2), the relevant case law, Menashe Business Mercantile Ltd v William Hill Organisation Ltd [2002]RPC 31 which dealt with a product claim and established the test which asks (i) who uses? and (ii) where is it used?. Arnold J applied the same test to Motorola's process claim, with answers "RIM" and "in Canada" for the BIS arrangement, for which consequently no infringement occurred (based on Motorola's incorrect construction).

On a correct construction of the claim, neither the BES or BIS arrangements would have represented an infringement.

Invalidity and common general knowledge

As is standard practice, novelty and inventive step arguments were based on documents provided by the counterclaimant. The application level command protocol conversion, which according to Motorola was defined by feature [5] of claim of the 009 Patent , was considered to be novel in view of the prior art. However, Arnold J held that this feature was not inventive in the light of the prior art and also not inventive in light of the common general knowledge alone. The subject-matter of the 009 patent was therefore found to be non-patentable and the patent was held to be invalid.

The identification of the skilled person's common general knowledge is noteworthy in this case, because it shows that a non-published correspondence may be used as evidence supporting the case that a particular teaching was common general knowledge. RIM produced an e-mail predating the 009 priority date and disclosing application level command protocol conversion: Motorola said that the e-mail was a "very obscure document" and could not support the argument that application level command protocol conversion was within the common general knowledge. Arnold J said it was important to distinguish between information known by some, or perhaps by many, and information which forms common general knowledge. In any case, based on the e-mail and 6 other documents provided by RIM (all published), Arnold J concluded that the application level translation was common general knowledge – it is less clear if the same decision would have been reached in the absence of the six other documents.

Comment

A number of issues arise from this case.

RIM's case was won primarily on the construction argument: the feature on which Motorola's infringement action was based turned out to be undisclosed in the whole application. The lesson for patent litigants is that correct patent drafting and subsequent claim construction is crucial to patent protection. Imaginative reconstruction in the sense of HP v Waters Corp is inappropriate. Above all, one should ensure one knows what is actually being protected and that this coincides with expectation!

Secondly, while the patent claim category will determine how infringement may be assessed, in S60(2) –type infringements both product and process claims will be subject to the simple test devised in Menashe v William Hill.

Thirdly, this case may make it more likely that unpublished documents, such as private e-mails, may support a case for the disclosure being common general knowledge.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 31/04/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions