UK: FSA consults on Client Asset Protection - the Beginning of a Journey

Last Updated: 8 April 2010
Article by Ash Saluja, Maxine Cupitt and Paul Edmondson

Over the past few months FSA has turned its spotlight on client asset protection, and most recently it has published its first consultation paper (CP) on amendments to the client assets rulebook (CASS).

As a reminder, client assets are assets (including money) that belong to a client but are held for safekeeping by a firm (typically investment firms and insurance brokers) on behalf of the client under a trust. Firms that hold client assets are generally required to keep them separate from their own resources in order to protect them.

Recent events (most significantly, the collapse of Lehman Brothers) have shown that many firms have failed to do this properly, and that the existing regulatory regime is ill-equipped to address these failures in the event of the insolvency of those firms, when clients need those assets to be returned to them.

The CP is set to be the first in a series of FSA consultations aimed at enhancing client asset protection, which will have wide-ranging and costly implications for many investment and intermediary firms.

This particular consultation focuses on the following topics:

  • new client transparency and reporting requirements for prime brokers;
  • "ules against custodians taking liens over client assets;
  • restrictions on the amount of client money that can be held with group entities;
  • "learer client asset governance arrangements, including a new significant influence function; and
  • the resurrection of client asset regulatory returns.

To view the article in full, please see below:

Full Article

Over the past few months FSA has turned its spotlight on client asset protection, and yesterday it published its first consultation paper (CP) on amendments to the client asset rulebook (CASS).

As a reminder, client assets are assets (including money) that belong to a client but are held for safekeeping by a firm (typically investment firms and insurance brokers) on behalf of the client under a trust. The firm may be holding the money/assets to enable the provision of brokering, trading or portfolio services, and unlike banks, investment firms and intermediaries are generally required to separate client money and assets from their own in order to protect them.

It is now clear that many firms are failing to comply with CASS, whether out of ignorance, incompetence, poor management, or all three. It is also clear that the existing regulatory regime for client assets is ill-equipped to address these failures in the event of the insolvency of those firms, which is precisely the time when clients need those assets to be returned to them promptly and in full.

The stance that FSA has adopted in 2010 around client assets is very clear – it has a low tolerance for CASS compliance failures and will intervene and take enforcement action where necessary.

At the same time the FSA (working with the Treasury and the industry) needs to improve the regulatory regime around client assets in order to restore confidence post-Lehmans. This is a significant undertaking, in which this CP is only the first step.

Putting the CP in context

FSA's CASS rulebook is finally getting its first major overhaul since MiFID. Given the current economic climate and the enhanced risk of firms becoming insolvent, some might say this has been long overdue. To put the CP in context, significant recent activity in the client assets domain has included:

  • Consideration of the enhanced risk of insolvency of firms in the investments sector, and in particular the December 2009 High Court judgement on the insolvency of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE), in which significant shortcomings were identified in the CASS regime;
  • a Treasury consultation launched in December 2009 on 'living wills' for investment banks, which proposed some radical measures aimed at increasing the protection afforded to client money;
  • the establishment of a specialist CASS risk team within the FSA, which has conducted several client asset investigations resulting in enforcement action;
  • the FSA's Client Assets Report, which raised multiple concerns about how firms are discharging their obligations under the current CASS regime; and
  • a stern letter "Dear DEO letter" sent by FSA to CEOs of investment firms and insurance intermediaries, requiring them to confirm that their firms are in compliance with CASS.

The process to restore consumer faith in firms that hold client assets (and in the effectiveness of the regulatory regime for client assets) is set to be a long haul. FSA's trajectory for reform over the next 12 months includes:

  • Consulting on the appropriate use of title transfer collateral arrangements (July 2010);
  • Consulting on refining the scope and increasing the standard of client asset audit reporting (Sept 2010);
  • FSA's ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of insolvency-proof special purpose vehicles (SPVs) (2010);
  • Consulting on a new resolution regime for investment firms (2010/2011)
  • An overhaul of CASS 5 (insurance intermediation client money) (Q1 2011)

The CP contains six key proposals, which develop on some of the recommendations made by the Treasury in its 'living wills' consultation, and which we consider in turn below.

Proposal 1 - Increasing re-hypothecation disclosure in prime brokerage agreements

What is proposed? The proposal is for all prime brokers to include a mandatory 'disclosure annex' in each prime brokerage agreement. This will not interfere with the contractual terms of the agreement, and is instead aimed at increasing the client's awareness of the risks involved in depositing client assets with the prime broker, in particular where the prime broker re-hypothecates those assets (i.e. uses them for its own purposes whilst it has control of them). The disclosure annex will clearly identify and explain the relevant operative parts of the agreement that relate to re-hypothecation, set out any contractual limit to re-hypothecation, and list the key risks involved, including the risk of the prime broker becoming insolvent.

Why is it proposed? The FSA's evidence in the wake of Lehman Brothers shows that LBIE's clients simply failed to understand the potential consequences of their prime broker's insolvency. This may be a reflection of poor standards of legal due diligence on the part of the clients when reviewing prime brokerage agreements, or lack of appreciation of the technicalities of CASS and insolvency law – most likely both. Since Lehman Brothers' collapse, the FSA has noticed that some clients have become smarter (for example they are using multi-prime models), but considers that a mandated disclosure is still necessary. Whilst FSA has stopped short of applying a cap on re-hypothecation, it has stated that it may impose restrictions on a case-by-case basis where compliance issues within a particular firm are identified.

What is the impact of the proposal? Prime brokerage firms will have to update their precedent agreements and re-paper all their existing clients to include the mandatory disclosure annex. This also means that they will be forced to locate and identify the latest enforceable versions of client agreement, which may be difficult where poor records have been kept or where version control has not been properly implemented. FSA hopes that this will encourage firms to tidy up their agreements. FSA will later consider applying this requirement to other firms that re-hypothecate client assets (for example contracts for difference and spread betting providers). In some of those firms (where retail clients are involved) risk warning notices are already in use.

Proposal 2 - Mandatory Reporting to Prime Brokerage Clients

What is proposed? The proposal is for all prime brokers to provide daily close of business statements to their clients. These statements will include, amongst other information, up to date valuations of all loans, stock-lending amounts, futures settlement amounts, collateral and margin amounts, mark-to-market on OTC positions and the total client assets held, as well as the location of those assets, naming the relevant custodian and/or bank.

Why is it proposed? Again, the FSA's evidence in the wake of Lehman Brothers shows that LBIE's clients did not have access to recent information about their accounts, which led to uncertainty (for example around whether instructions to pay out assets at the last minute had been executed, and what assets were actually segregated and/or re-hypothecated). The FSA claims that most prime brokers do now offer daily reporting, but still wishes to standardise this requirement across the industry to discourage firms from aggressively re-hypothecating assets of clients who enter do not normally require regular reporting. The availability of daily reports will also assist insolvency practitioners in distributing assets promptly (although there is still scope for a potential one-day lag between the time of the last report and the time of insolvency).

What is the impact of the proposal? Aside from the significant IT systems costs to implement this proposal, prime brokers may find that they are less able to re-hypothecate client assets once such activity is made more transparent to clients. This may require them to turn to other sources for working capital (e.g. to fund proprietary trading). As with proposal 1, FSA will later consider applying this requirement to other firms that re-hypothecate client assets.

Proposal 3 - Restricting the pacing of client money within a group

What is proposed? The FSA proposes limiting the amount of client money that can be deposited by any firm with intra-group institutions (i.e. banks and money market funds within the firm's group) to 20% of the total client money held by the relevant firm. This is in addition to the general requirement to exercise due skill care and diligence when selecting institutions for client money deposits (a process that the FSA has found to be lacking in rigour and substance in several firms).

Why is it proposed? The FSA acknowledges that all client money will ultimately be held as a deposit on trust, and that there is always the risk that the institution holding the deposit may fail. However, this proposal is intended to tackle the contagion risk where a firm holds an inappropriate amount of client money with other group companies. As was the case in Lehman Brothers, several companies are likely to become insolvent in any group in times of stress, meaning that clients unfairly bear the risk of the group as a whole rather than just the individual firm. The 20% level (rather than an outright ban) is, in part, intended to reflect the fact that credit risk outside a particular group that has a strong credit rating may be higher than within the group itself.

What is the impact of the proposal? This proposal (as well as those listed below) will affect all UK-authorised firms (not only prime brokers). When firms deposit client money with third party institutions they are likely to receive lower rates of interest, since such institutions will view those funds as overnight deposits, and unlike intra-group banks they will not attribute any group liquidity benefit to those funds. Therefore firms (and their groups) will be less able to use client money as a cheap source of liquidity with which to fund operations. This is more likely to be a problem in times of stress, where liquidity is stretched. Firms may need to resort to other external sources of funding, with a consequent higher cost of capital.

Proposal 4 - Prohibiting the use of liens in custodian agreements

What is proposed? CASS currently contains guidance (CASS 6.3.3G) that states that firms should consider carefully the terms of custody agreements under which their clients' assets are held for safekeeping. This includes considering restrictions on the custodian's right to claim a lien (or a right of retention or sale) over the client assets. The FSA proposes to turn this guidance into a hard rule, so that no such lien etc. will be allowed (with the exception of a permitted lien to cover the custodian's charges that relate specifically to those client assets).

Why is it proposed? The FSA considers it unacceptable that custody liens over client assets may be so wide as to cover the firm's (or its group's) indebtedness to the custodian. Wide-ranging liens of this sort can delay the distribution of client assets in the event of the firm's insolvency, as was the case in LBIE's insolvency, and they arguably go against the spirit of UK insolvency principles.

What is the impact of the proposal? Custodians will no longer have the ability to retain client assets in respect of unrelated debts owed by a firm (or its group).

Proposal 5 – Closer regulatory scrutiny of the client assets officer

What is proposed? FSA proposes that one person in each MiFID firm should have oversight responsibility for client assets via a new controlled function. This controlled function will be a 'required function' and 'significant influence function'. Firms will be given 'CASS categorisations' (as small, medium or large CASS firms) depending on the amount of client assets that they hold (whether as money or custody assets, or both). Small CASS firms will be required to allocate the new controlled function to an existing director, whereas medium and large CASS firms will be able to allocate the new controlled function to a director or senior manager, and will need to obtain specific FSA approval for the appointment. In the case of large firms, that appointment will be subject to the competency-based approach for interviewing (see our article on governance arrangements here ).

Why is it proposed? One of FSA's criticisms in its client assets report was that there is a general lack of management accountability for client assets compliance in the industry. Often, responsibility is split across a number of staff in compliance, operations, finance and/or treasury. The FSA would prefer one individual to have ultimate oversight responsibility (although several members of staff may continue to be involved).

What is the impact of the proposal? Most medium/large MiFID firms are likely to have one individual who is responsible for CASS compliance in any case. This individual will now be required to be an approved person, and will therefore be subject to the FSA's Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for approved persons, and a higher level of regulatory scrutiny and accountability. This role is in addition to the business resolution officer (BRO) role being mooted by the Treasury in its living wills consultation.

Proposal 6 - Re-introducing the client money and assets return (CMAR)

What is proposed? FSA has proposed bringing back the CMAR - a reporting framework that was in use prior to the FSA's existence (for example under the SFA). The CMAR will be reviewed, authorised and submitted by the CASS oversight controlled function on a monthly basis for medium and large CASS firms, and by the relevant director twice a year for small CASS firms.

Why is it proposed? The CMAR will give the FSA a micro and macro view of client asset holding in the UK, and may assist insolvency practitioners in the prompt identification and distribution of client assets.

What is the impact of the proposal? Firms are likely to incur a systems cost, and their client asset operations will be subject to closer regulatory scrutiny.

To read CP 10/9 see here .

The client assets and living wills page on our Regzone contains more useful information relevant to this topic – please see here . If you would like to discuss the CP in more detail, are considering a response, or have some concerns in relation client money, please contact your usual CMS contact, or one of the following members of our financial services team:

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 01/04/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.