UK: Supermarket Wars

Last Updated: 19 November 2009
Article by Murray Shaw

On 9 October Lady Clark issued her decision in an application for judicial review by Sainsbury's in relation to a decision of Perth & Kinross Council. The facts are complicated but the judge made some interesting observations of general relevance.

Before dealing with the case it is probably worth just commenting on the background. It appears that one area of the Scottish economy that remains buoyant is supermarket development, possibly reflecting the fact that in the economic climate we currently face supermarket profitability has held up well. The "battle ground" between supermarkets appears to be focused however on some of the smaller towns in Scotland – the dispute in Kelso that is ongoing being a notable example of that. This decision involves Crieff and reflects that trend.

The case involved a Petition for judicial review. Lord Gill in his recent report has proposed changes to judicial review including a requirement that any case must be brought within 3 months and that leave must be sought to proceed with a judicial review petition. In England leave is a requirement but there is no such requirement in Scotland. Given the comments of the judge in this case it is interesting to speculate as to whether this petition would have proceeded had leave been necessary.

So far as the case is concerned as noted above it relates to possible developments in Crieff. In effect there were two competing sites in Crieff, the Market Place site and the Duchlage Farm site. The Market Place site was the site which Sainsbury's had an interest in. This was owned by Crieff Highland Gathering Limited but subject to a lease to Perth & Kinross Council until 2043. The Duchlage Farm site is the site in which Tesco had an interest. Perth & Kinross Council had an ownership interest but significantly in the capacity as planning authority preferred the Duchlage Farm location. Sainsbury's had however secured outline planning permission in relation to the Market Place site from a Reporter and indeed Perth & Kinross Council as planning authority had granted reserved matters approval in terms of that outline planning permission albeit subject to conditions which were both onerous and indeed impossible to fulfil given the "ownership" interest of Perth & Kinross Council in the Market Place site based upon the lease from Crieff Highland Gathering Limited.

Specifically the challenge related to decisions made by Perth & Kinross Council in December 2008 which affirmed a decision made in 2005 that Duchlage Farm was the preferred location for a new supermarket in Crieff in planning terms and reaffirmed the terms of a development brief for that site.

Sainsbury's in their arguments challenged the position of Perth & Kinross Council on a number of grounds. It was argued that their decisions were irrational and perverse having granted reserved matters approval on the Market Place site. It also argued that the factual matrix and documentation before the court evidenced an intention on the part of Perth & Kinross Council to frustrate the planning permission that Sainsbury's enjoyed resulting from a confusion between the Council's interest as planning authority and their interest as land owners in the "rival" site. It was also argued that the Council were not properly fulfilling their role as planning authority by placing undue weight on their interest as a land owner by being the lessee of the Market Place site. Separately it was argued that undue weight was put forward on planning offers (contributions) put forward by Tesco. In response to a challenge that they had no title and interest to sue, Sainsbury's argued that the fact there was an element of commercial interest did not mean they could not have title and interest, in any event they were objectors in relation to the Duchlage Farm site and the permission they held in relation to Market Place also gave them an interest.

The case is worth reading for the detailed analysis of the arguments which the judge (Lady Clark) went through which given their complexity are not rehearsed here. However specific points worthy of comment are as follows: -

a. Lady Clark observed that the role of the court in the judicial review was a limited one and appeared to contrast that with the role of Perth & Kinross Council as planning authority charged with a wide range of statutory functions;

b. Lady Clark thought that there was distinction between decision making and policy formulation and specifically observed that she did not consider that the policy development function of a Council was brought to a halt by virtue of a particular decision providing the significance of the decision was recognised in the policy making function;

c. She declined invitation to draw the inferences proposed by Sainsbury's in relation to the actings of the Council having regard to their land interest in the Market Place site. She specifically suggested that she found submissions on the part of the petitioners in this regard "unconvincing". She equally indicated that she thought that the fact that Perth & Kinross Council were planning authority did not affect their rights as holders of the lease. Specifically she indicated she did not think that simply because Sainsbury's had gained planning permission meant that the Council had to act differently having regard to their property interests even if those property interests were relevant to the implementation of the planning permission that Sainsbury's had obtained.

In dealing with a number of the aspects of the Petition and arguments put forward by Sainsbury's Lady Clark characterised their response as a "scatter gun" approach. She observed that while it was correct that Sainsbury's had secured a planning permission, that planning permission was the result of a specific consideration by the Reporter of a specific site, not a process which involved the detailed consideration of the rival site. In essence she considered that in reporting to members planning officials had correctly identified the relevant information for the members to take into account and that in reaching the decision they did the members had done so having regard therefore to the relevant information. Lady Clark did observe that at the time the guidance was made there was no "statutory" requirement in relation to the making of supplementary planning guidance. The position of course has changed now given the implementation of the new planning legislation, though given her views of the arguments of Sainsbury's it is difficult to conceive that she would have come to a different view even if the new legislation had been in effect.

The last issue which Lady Clark dealt with was title and interest to sue. She acknowledged that logically this would normally be dealt with before any consideration was given to the merits of the Petition. Given however what she considered the complexity of the issues she thought that it was relevant to "unravel the issues before addressing title and interest". The question of title and interest is one that is topical in the Scottish Courts, Lord Carloway having commented at some length on the issues in the case of Edgar Road Property Company LLP [29 May 2007]. In that case Lord Carloway had rehearsed the statutory provisions noting that there was limited formal right to object given and that was a relevant consideration in determining who had title and interest to sue. Lady Clark noted that the petitioners were objectors to the application for Duchlage Farm and were entitled to have their objections properly considered. She went on however that she did not consider that the decisions of the respondents which were challenged affected the petitioners' rights in that context. She therefore concluded that she did not think the petitioners had title at this stage to seek judicial review. She also indicated that in her view the primary interest of the petitioners was a commercial one and while she did not rehearse the arguments in detail, indicated that she did not accept that this gave them an interest to challenge policy particularly when the policy was intended to cover a range of objectives (the policy complained of while relevant to the supermarket development also touched upon related issues such as open space and school issues). Specifically she said "the mere commercial interest of the petitioners is not sufficient to found interest in relation this judicial review and I have difficulty in identifying what interest in law they have to challenge the planning policy". Interestingly enough she went on to say that such interest might arise if they had title but she had already concluded they did not.

The Petition was therefore refused – the impression being that Lady Clark had little difficulty in refusing the Petition.

A number of the comments in the case are interesting and likely to be of general application. The case does indicate the difficulties in pursuing a judicial review application. What is not clear from the decision is the extent to which the existence of a judicial review petition (which took some 10 months to determine) had in relation to the development and application of the Duchlage Farm site.

The issue of title and interest is one that Scottish Courts appear to be particularly interested in at the moment and there may be further developments – though of course these developments may well be overtaken by the proposed changes set out in Lord Gill's report.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.