UK: Solvency II Reporting - Public Disclosure And Supervisory Reporting In The New World

Last Updated: 2 September 2009
Article by Deloitte Financial Services Group

Most Read Contributor in UK, August 2017


Consultation Paper 58/09 (CP58) sets out CEIOPS' draft technical advice to the European Commission for the development of the level 2 implementing measures of Pillar 3 of the Solvency II regime. Pillar 3 deals with the requirements for supervisory reporting and public disclosure under the Solvency II regime. The objectives are to harmonise reporting, promote comparability of valuation and reporting rules with International Accounting Standards, introduce proportionate requirements for small undertakings and ensure efficient supervision of insurance groups and financial conglomerates.

CEIOPS has considered a number of options in its impact assessment on the most appropriate content, frequency, level of assurance and format of the reporting.

The reporting requirement applies at both a stand alone regulated entity (so called "solo" reporting level) and group level. At both levels insurers need to set out in a disclosure policy, approved by management, appropriate governance procedures to ensure timely, complete, consistent and accurate reporting.

The key reporting requirements are:

1. Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR)

This report is the public disclosure which is expected to be made available via electronic publication. The SFCR will be required within either 3 or 4 months of an insurer's financial year end. The SFCR must follow a prescribed structure that CEIOPS developed based on the Framework Directive. The areas covered in the SFCR are: Business and Performance, System of Governance, Risk Management, Regulatory Balance Sheet and Capital Management.

2. Report to Supervisor (RTS)

The RTS is not public and is communicated only to the firm's supervisor. The RTS expands on the SFCR's disclosures using a similar, prescribed structure but this time presenting the information differently as part of the ongoing supervisory dialogue with the firm. For example the summary of business and risk strategies and the financial and non-financial objectives associated with them, the explanation of variance to plan rather than the prior period, and expected future developments are areas where the SFCR would be silent. The frequency with which an undertaking has to provide full qualitative information through the RTS will be linked to the intensity of the Supervisory Review Process (SRP). CP58 indicates that each regulator must require the RTS every five years, at a minimum. However the frequency could be increased up to an annual basis.

3. Private reports to the regulator on occurrence of pre-defined business events (for example changes in business strategy)

Content of the new reports

The content required builds on existing IFRS disclosure, as the reference framework for the regime, incorporating Solvency II specific outputs such as the internal model and details of the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), and defines materiality in the context of the IAS definition.

Both the SFCR and RTS contain qualitative and quantitative information including prescribed Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs). CP58 sets out several provisional QRTs of which a subset will be reported to the supervisor on a quarterly basis, 3 or 4 weeks after the quarter end. CEIOPS will be providing full guidance, definitions and requirements as it develops the Level 3 guidance for European supervisors.

CP58 confirms there will be some form of external audit requirement and sets out tentative conclusions, to be finalised at Level 3, on which quantitative and qualitative aspects of the new reporting regime could be included in the scope of the audit.

CP58 specifies the structure for the SFCR and RTS, proposing the minimum content of the information required to make it easier for supervisors and users of the public disclosure to compare one insurer with another and achieve the objective of improving market transparency.

Appendix 1 gives a summary of the structure for the SFCR and RTS and details the key additional information required in the RTS but not in the SFCR. In broad terms the RTS requires information relating to the following example areas which are not required in the SFCR:

  • the business and risk strategies including the business continuity plan;
  • legal and regulatory issues affecting the business;
  • variance against plan rather than prior period;
  • future anticipated solvency needs, underwriting performance projections and changes in risk exposure; and
  • significant additional disclosure explaining the results of the internal model.

As explained above the SFCR and RTS are required for each regulated entity and at group level. However CP58 also sets out the proposal for a single group-wide SFCR where each solo SFCR, for the parent and subsidiary entities, is included in an annex. It may also require each annex to be translated into a language commonly understood by all the other supervisory authorities concerned.

CP58 does not include proposals on when the first SFCR and RTS will be required: whether it is intended to be the first financial year end after Solvency II comes into force on 31 October 2012 or after that date.

A summary of the requirements is set out in Appendix 2.

Key themes

We have identified a number of key themes in common with the rest of the Solvency II regime which are of particular importance for Pillar 3:

  • Alignment with IFRS;
  • Need for senior management engagement; and
  • Control, documentation and assurance.

Alignment with IFRS

To minimise the administrative burden of Pillar 3 the Solvency II reporting extensively refers to IFRS disclosures. This approach is consistent with the reference to IFRS as endorsed in the EU as the basis for valuation of assets and non-insurance liabilities in the solvency balance sheet as proposed in CEIOPS CP35 published last March.

CEIOPS seems to have contemplated market-wide synergies that would arise from using IFRS as the single statutory reporting basis across the EU. However the draft regulations do not go as far as making IFRS the required financial reporting framework, leaving it to member state governments to extend voluntarily the use of IFRS beyond listed companies.

This is a decision which is likely to be taken in the UK effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2012. A paper is expected to be published by the UK Accounting Standards Board in early August 2009 seeking views on its proposal to replace current UK GAAP by adopting IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities. If this is the case then all UK insurers will have IFRS as their financial reporting framework by the time Solvency II is implemented.

European insurers are currently at different stages in relation to the adoption of IFRS – as shown in the table below for a sample of UK insurance companies.

Although IFRS and regulatory reporting serve different purposes, the latter is being developed with the objective of alignment with IFRS. Both frameworks recognise risks and their management as key disclosure requirements. In particular, the ability to see how risk and capital are managed by senior executives will provide valuable insights into the quality of risk management and decision making to European policyholders.

The extent of the similarities of a UK insurer's current financial reporting with the future solvency reporting requirements depends on whether it already complies with IFRS, in particular with IFRS 4 and IFRS 7, or their UK GAAP equivalents, the Operating and Financial Review (OFR) and the Combined Code on Corporate Governance. In Appendix 3, we can see the considerable overlaps between the disclosure requirements of Pillar 3 and current financial reporting requirements, including IFRS, Companies Act 2006 and the UK Listing Rules.

For insurers already on IFRS the key issue ahead of developing Pillar 3 implementation plans is to establish how good the IFRS disclosures are compared with the requirements of the SFCR. The use of existing public disclosures is subject to a qualitative test of equivalence in terms of their nature and scope (article 52 of the Framework Directive).

The finalisation of the IFRS 4 Phase II project will provide further alignment between Solvency II and IFRS. For example, both Solvency II and Phase II use best estimate valuation techniques as the starting point for the measurement of the insurance liabilities. However Solvency II will not follow the IFRS product classification but instead define its scope based on the legal entity regulatory status as an authorised insurer selling regulated products which could include both insurance contracts accounted for under IFRS 4 and investment contracts accounting for under IAS 39. For jurisdictions such as the UK where tax for life insurers is based on regulatory returns this difference in scope could also have tax implications.

The alignment of Solvency II to IFRS offers an opportunity for insurance companies to adopt an integrated approach that, with the implementation of IFRS at legal entity level, would facilitate the compliance with the Solvency II requirements and simplify processes and systems of the organisation. We believe that simplification of reporting processes could be achieved if the insurer starts from an IFRS basis to build its Solvency II reports.

Senior management engagement

The type of information which needs to be disclosed under Pillar 3 will mean that senior management need to engage in the preparation as well as review of the SFCR and RTS. Some of the statements to be disclosed will not be easily delegated to the financial reporting function, for example around business strategy, ORSA and system of governance. The relative ease with which users will be able to interrogate the disclosure given its comparability will further increase pressure on Boards to "get it right".

Since the main stakeholders addressed in the SFCR are the policyholders – the paper even states the executive summary should be aimed specifically at them – the SFCR could be a great vehicle to enhance the relationship between insurers and their customers. It is possible that customer relationship directors would be directly involved in shaping the SFCR which could become an element in the customer retention strategy if the messages of strong capital position and effective risk management contribute to reassure policyholders that their money has been safely placed with the insurer. These considerations, combined with the sheer range of information required, will have a profound impact on the internal organisation of insurers. For example we believe it will stimulate the change in the communication and interaction between finance and other functions such as risk management, compliance and the actuarial function that would call for a far more integrated approach to financial and regulatory reporting than under the old operating model.

This is not simply a Pillar 3 observation but one that applies throughout Solvency II. For example, the requirement for the ORSA to be embedded in the day to day decision making of the insurer will require internal MI to spell out clearly the risk and capital impacts of different course of actions and business decisions. The need for this alignment arises from the consideration that to deliver external reporting that is relevant, reliable and comprehensible then communication must be relevant, reliable and comprehensible internally. Those responsible for preparing the new reports must be encouraged and empowered to challenge the technical input from other departments. Senior management must take the lead to make this new reporting process work effectively and collaboratively.

The chart opposite maps the range of information required in the proposed SFCR against the different departments most likely to be responsible for preparing and reviewing across the three lines of defence. Clear communication between these moving parts is vital to ensure a consistent, complete and accurate message is conveyed externally and to the supervisors.

Control, documentation and assurance

Disclosure policy

Insurers need to develop a written policy detailing:

  • the governance procedures;
  • responsibilities;
  • timeframes;
  • materiality principles;
  • identification of information already considered in the public domain and process to validate that it would be of the same nature and scope of the required disclosures; and
  • the process for the identification of information for which to seek regulatory permission of non-public disclosure on the confidentiality grounds set out under article 52 of the Framework Directive.

Whilst insurers may well have timetables with the key milestones and deliverables for regulatory reporting in existence at the moment, they are less likely to have a documented policy supported by robust processes and controls. In developing this written policy and the related infrastructure, the insurer should consider how to have its departments interacting with each other to avoid inefficiencies and duplication of effort and at the same time ensure consistent, accurate and complete compliance with the policy and the regulations.

Asset management certification

One further aspect which senior management needs to consider is the requirement in the SFCR to certify that assets have been invested in accordance with the "prudent person" principle, namely that the complexity of the assets underlying the insurer's portfolio is commensurate with the ability of the appropriate personnel and systems to understand, monitor and manage those instruments. The introduction of this certification process is not unique to Solvency II. For example the UK government has recently introduced a requirement of "certification" for the accurateness of tax returns.

External audit

As noted previously the paper confirms there will be some form of external audit requirement and sets out tentative conclusions on which aspects this will include as set out in Appendix 4.

We do not consider that the scope proposed for external audit is unduly onerous and recognise there will be synergies with the existing statutory audits of financial statements. However, this form of audit would be an additional compliance cost that the regime could introduce.

CEIOPS recognises the difficulties for requiring an external audit of an approved internal model and has not included this in the proposed scope. Requiring the audit of internal models that do not generate audited financial information would call for an extensive audit effort with significant cost implications for the sign off to be achieved within the timelines envisaged. On the other hand the internal model is the corner stone of the new regime and the regulators need to be satisfied that there are alternative forms of external oversight to give assurance to the market that the internal model is used as approved.

Another fundamental dimension of the decision on audit requirements is the legacy of each member state. The UK market is used to regulatory returns being subject to audit. Indeed, following the reviews into the actuarial profession after the closure to new business of Equitable Life, the scope of external assurance on UK regulatory returns increased with additional responsibilities for the Independent Auditor and a new role of Reviewing Actuary. This approach is not common among other member states where there is limited external audit involvement as the table below demonstrates.

Pillar 3 implementation programme for 2009 and beyond

The timing of a Pillar 3 programme will be significantly influenced by the finalisation of the proposals of the Level 2 implementing measures that the European Commissions expects to adopt formally by November 2010 and the outcome of other Solvency II legislative projects, for example the development of Level 2 implementing measures for the ORSA and the SCR, as well as by the size, nature and complexity of the insurer.

CP58 encourages insurers to start analysing the potential disclosure requirements now and begin assessing changes that could be required to IT systems if these proposals were finalised as drafted. CP58 obviously also discourages any full system implementation activity at this stage. Significant CEIOPS work has already been inputted to develop the QRTs and, as it points out, much of the information will be information which management itself needs to monitor the business compliance with Solvency II.

Interpreting the disclosure requirements as if they were final, developing a strategy for disclosure and educating key internal stakeholders on the potential impact impacts are all sensible steps that insurers could begin right now, with the added benefit of providing senior management with the detailed knowledge that would make their comments to CP58 focussed and tied to specific business issues (comments to CEIOPS are due by 11 September 2009).

We envisage a Pillar 3 programme could have three main components:

  1. disclosure impact assessment – to identify the impact of the proposed requirements on existing reporting procedures (systems, data, people, processes and controls);
  2. disclosure design – to design the structure and principles of the Solvency II reporting regime; and
  3. disclosure report building and implementation – to implement changes to the reporting framework to deliver the Solvency II requirements.

Insurers clearly need to ensure they meet the minimum level of regulatory compliance in their Pillar 3 reporting when Solvency II is operational on 31 October 2012.

However by investing in a reporting programme we believe insurers can optimise the use of their Solvency II resources and turn the compliance burden into a number of strategic opportunities:

  • Building a trusting relationship with customers, shareholders, rating agencies and other stakeholders. A number of recent examples have highlighted the damage and loss of trust inaccurate reporting can cause. We believe that relevant and accurate disclosure of risk and capital management can improve reputation and confidence;
  • Aligning Solvency II with IFRS information could help investor relations. Delivering both quantitative and qualitative risk information to investors would help support efficient markets and would help reward management strategy by demonstrating how the risk appetite is linked to strategic objectives and decisions and to the IFRS profit;
  • Building a brand that is recognised for strength of capital position, transparency in its operations and sound risk management practices to maintain customer confidence and hence market share; and
  • Demonstrating the effectiveness of control functions such as risk, compliance and internal audit, giving greater assurance over the reporting, particularly if the ultimate choice on the external audit requirements is for a limited degree of independent assurance.


We concur with CEIOPS in highlighting the importance of analysing the implications of Pillar 3 requirements to leverage as far as possible existing reporting processes, systems and controls and to take advantage of the strategic opportunities Pillar 3 offers.

IFRS, as endorsed in the EU, has emerged as the usual reference framework for the Solvency II balance sheet and disclosure. There is an opportunity for insurers to adopt an integrated approach to move beyond short term IFRS conversion measures by implementing IFRS and Solvency II systems and processes concurrently, particularly following the plans of the International of its projects on insurance liabilities and investment accounting in the next 24 months.

A Pillar 3 programme starting with an assessment against the proposals of CP58 should help insurers prepare for the production of useful, transparent and tailored information, consistent with other disclosures that can help to capture these advantages.

To view this document in its entirety please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.