UK: Maintaining The Validity Of Guarantees

Last Updated: 17 September 2009
Article by Edward Davis and Sue Millar

In Bank of Scotland Plc v (1) Constantine Makris (2) Ben O'Sullivan (2009) (Ch D), the Court considered the validity of a guarantee in light of a variation to the underlying facility agreement between the bank and the borrower company in the form of a reduction in the amount of the facility.

Bank of Scotland Plc (the "Bank") sought to recover a sum due under a guarantee provided in relation to a facility agreement between the Bank and the borrower company after the borrower company entered into creditors' voluntary liquidation.


The borrower company was the vehicle for a joint business venture between three men, Mr Constantine Makris, Mr Ben O'Sullivan and Mr Vincenzo Spano. The facility agreement initially provided for an overdraft facility for the company of up to £250,000. The advance of the overdraft facility was conditional on the provision of security as follows:

1 A fixed and floating charge, and a legal charge over the borrower company's leasehold interest in its premises.

2 A guarantee by Mr Spano in the sum of £250,000 supported by a legal charge over his home (the "Property").

3 An unsecured guarantee limited to £50,000 from Mr Makris and Mr O'Sullivan expressed to be joint and several.

The facility agreement was signed on behalf of the company by Mr Spano and Mr Makris. The guarantee for £50,000 was duly signed by Mr Makris and Mr O'Sullivan.

A complication arose in respect of Mr Spano's guarantee. The Bank discovered that Mr Spano was not the sole owner of the Property. It was in fact registered in the joint names of him and his mother. Although Mr Spano's mother joined with her son in executing the guarantee and charge in favour of the Bank, the Bank regarded the security as weakened by the mother's involvement. As a result, the Bank was only prepared to advance an overdraft facility to the company of up to £230,000. A revised facility agreement for this amount was issued by the Bank and the facility agreement was signed on behalf of the company, as before, by Mr Spano and Mr Makris. These two defendants subsequently disputed their liability to meet the guarantee, on separate grounds, and a dispute arose in respect of whether the guarantee was valid.

Variation of principal contract

Mr Makris argued that the reduction of the overdraft facility from £250,000 to £230,000 was a material variation of the principal contract (between the Bank and the borrower company) and thus discharged the guarantee.

The Court accepted that a material variation of a principal contract may discharge a guarantee if the variation occurs without the consent of the guarantor (the rule in Holme v Brunskill (1878) 3 QBD 495). The Court found however that the principle did not apply in this case for the following reasons:

1 The change in the amount of the overdraft facility was not a variation of the contract. The change arose as a result of the fact that one of the conditions to which the initial facility had been subject (the provision of a charge by Mr Spano over his property) had not been met. Thus, the revised facility offered to the borrower company by the Bank represented a fresh offer of a lesser amount on different conditions. The wording of the guarantee was wide enough to cover the liability under this new facility.

2 Mr Makris co-signed the revised facility agreement on behalf of the borrower company. This was seen by the Court as a manifestation of his consent to the reduced amount of the facility.

3 Clause 9.9 of the guarantee precluded reliance on a variation to reduce or discharge the guarantee.

The Court therefore could not see a legitimate basis upon which Mr Makris could show that the reduction in the borrower company's overdraft facility was a material variation in the facility agreement between the Bank and the borrower company, sufficient to discharge the guarantee.

Undue influence

The case advanced by Mr O'Sullivan was that his signature on the guarantee had been procured by the undue influence of Mr Spano.

The Judge applied the leading case of Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No.2) [2002] 2 AC 773. In order to establish undue influence, Mr O'Sullivan first needed to establish the presence of the "necessary relationship" between himself and Mr Spano which was capable of being abused by Mr Spano to override the free will of Mr O'Sullivan. This relationship was described as "trust and confidence, reliance, dependence or vulnerability on the one hand and ascendancy, domination or control on the other".

The Court found that Mr O'Sullivan had not come anywhere near establishing that the "necessary relationship" existed, despite accepting that the two men were close friends and part of a team. The Court further held that the Bank was not put on enquiry as to the existence of a "necessary relationship" so as to require it to take further steps in this regard, known as the sanitation process (a process by which a bank, having been put on enquiry as to the existence of a "necessary relationship", should take certain steps culminating in a certificate from an independent solicitor stating that the guarantor has received independent legal advice). The relationship between the guarantor (Mr O'Sullivan) and the debtor (the borrower company) was a commercial relationship and the Court rejected any concept of a hybrid relationship (part commercial and part non-commercial) – Etridge had envisaged that relationships would be strictly either commercial, or non-commercial, with only the latter requiring a bank to invoke the sanitation process.

Practical implications

Although this case turned on its own particular facts, it is a useful reminder that lenders should ensure that, where they do not have the benefit of an all-monies guarantee, and there is what could be viewed as a material variation in the terms of a loan agreement, the consent of any guarantor(s) is obtained to the variation so that the validity of the guarantee is maintained. Lenders should also continue to bear in mind that where a guarantee is to be provided by a guarantor who has a non-commercial relationship with the borrower, the lender will be put on enquiry as to the possibility of undue influence and must follow the sanitation process as set down in the Etridge case.

This article was originally written for Stephenson Harwood's quarterly publication, Finance Litigation Legal Eye. If you would like to receive this publication, please contact Stephenson Harwood (

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions