UK: Supreme Court Widens Access For Non-Parties To Litigation Documents

Last Updated: 8 August 2019
Article by Tom White

In Cape v Dring [2019] EWCA Civ 1795, the Supreme Court has made clear the breadth of the courts' jurisdiction to allow third parties to access documents held by the courts in relation to litigation. It will still be necessary for an applicant seeking access to those documents to pass a test balancing the principle of open justice against the risk of harming the maintenance of the judicial process or legitimate interests of others. However, the extent to which third parties can potentially access documents in litigation may be of surprise and concern to litigants in proceedings which are sensitive for commercial or other reasons. In this briefing we review the judgment and its implications.

Background

The case concerned claims brought against Cape by insurers. Insurers had paid out under employers' liability policies in respect of mesothelioma claims, and were seeking a contribution from Cape, which was alleged to have negligently produced asbestos insulation boards. There was voluminous documentation produced for the trial, and various court bundles. The trial took place, but before judgment was delivered the dispute was settled. The Asbestos Victim Support Groups Forum (UK) ("the Forum") sought to obtain copies of all the documents used at or disclosed for trial, including the trial bundles and transcript, in order to obtain information to assist in other cases.

The Forum's application was made pursuant to Rule 5.4C of the Civil Procedure Rules ("CPR"). Rule 5.4C(1) provides that non-parties can obtain statements of case (but not documents filed with or attached to them) and judgments or orders made in public. CPR 5.4C(2) provides that with the court's permission a non-party may obtain "from the records of the court a copy of any other document filed by a party..."

This issue was considered by the High Court, and then subsequently the Court of Appeal. In broad terms the Court of Appeal ordered that the Forum could obtain certain statements of case and certain witness statements, expert reports and written submissions, and that the matter should be remitted to the High Court to decide whether there were any other documents in relation to which confidentiality had been lost as they had been read out in court, or there were any other specific documents that should be disclosed in order to satisfy the principle of open justice. However, the Court of Appeal's finding was that there was no inherent jurisdiction to permit non-parties to obtain trial bundles, or documents referred to in written submissions, witness statements or expert reports or in open court, simply because they were referred to during a hearing.

Both parties appealed, with Cape essentially arguing the order was too broad and the Forum that it was too narrow.

Supreme Court judgment

Lady Hale gave the leading judgment of the Supreme Court, with which all of the other judges agreed.

Lady Hale held that there were three issues:

  • What is the scope of CPR 5.4C(2)?
  • Is access to court documents governed solely by the CPR or is there an inherent power to allow access?
  • If there is such a power, how far does it extend and how should it be exercised?

CPR 5.4(C)

The key issue here was what comprised the "records of the court". Lady Hale held this referred to documents and records that the court holds for its own purposes, not every single document generated in connection with a case and filed, lodged or kept at court. Current practice as to what is kept, it was held, could not determine the scope of the court's power to order access to case materials, as the principle of open justice is completely distinct from the practical requirements of running a justice system.

Open justice

Lady Hale held that the constitutional principle of open justice applies to all courts and tribunals exercising the judicial power of the state. Therefore, unless inconsistent with statute or rules of court, all courts and tribunals have an inherent jurisdiction to determine what the principle requires in terms of access to documents or other information. The purpose of the open justice principle includes enabling public scrutiny of the way in which courts decide cases, and to enable the public to understand how the justice system works and why decisions are taken. For the latter purpose it is necessary to understand the issues and the evidence. Whilst, in the past, general practice was to read out all the argument and evidence in court, modern practice is to reduce much of the argument and evidence to writing. Therefore, it is difficult, especially in complicated civil cases, to know what is going on without the written material.

Lady Hale stated that it follows from the decision in Guardian News and Media Ltd v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court [2012] EWCA Civ 420 that the public should be allowed access not only to written submissions and arguments but also to documents placed before the court and referred to during the hearing, and that this should not be limited to those which the judge has been asked to read or has said he or she has read.

However, it was held that the third party applicant has no right to be granted access. When an application is made, the courts must carry out a balancing act between the principle of open justice and the risk of harm that disclosure may cause to the maintenance of an effective judicial process or legitimate interests of others. Reasons for denying access may include: national security, protection of children or mentally disabled adults, protection of privacy interests more generally, and the protection of trade secrets and commercial confidentiality. Although in civil cases a party may be compelled to disclose documents that remain confidential until deployed in proceedings, even then there may be good reasons to preserve their confidentiality, for example in a patent case.

It was also held that the practicalities and proportionality of granting the request must be considered:

  • the non-party must pay the reasonable costs of granting access; and
  • where the material has not been retained, the burdens on the parties in identifying and retrieving it may be out of proportion to the benefits to the open justice principle, and the burden on the trial judge in deciding on disclosure may become harder or more time consuming. This is likely to be a stronger countervailing principle where proceedings have come to an end.

Application to the facts

Applying the above principles to the facts of this case, Lady Hale found that the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to make the order that it did, and had jurisdiction to make a wider order if it were right to do so. The basis of the wider order was the inherent jurisdiction (not the CPR) and the principles governing the exercise of that jurisdiction were those laid out in Guardian News and Media, Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20, A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 25 and this case.

Lady Hale noted that there had been no argument on the extent of the continuing obligation of the parties to cooperate with the court on furthering the open justice principle once proceedings are over. That and other practical questions should be resolved via a consultative process by the bodies responsible for framing the court rules. We may therefore see amendments to the CPR in this regard in the future.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal judgment had meant that relatively narrow access to documents was permitted to third parties. The Supreme Court judgment has made clear the broad inherent jurisdiction that the courts have to allow non-parties to access documents, and that it is not necessary for documents to have been read or deemed to have been read in court. This may result in more applications by non-parties, who may be interested in such information for a number of reasons: such as where the intention is to bring a claim against the same defendant, where the information will be relevant to a connected claim such as a professional negligence action arising from the same circumstances, or perhaps by the media for the purposes of a story.

It is likely that the potential for third parties to access documents will be of concern to some litigants in sensitive proceedings. There are a number of ways that parties concerned about access to documents may pre-empt and try to prevent access to certain documents. For example, CPR 5.4(c)(4) allows an application for an order to prevent non-party access to statements of case. Under CPR 31.22(2), the court may make an order restricting or prohibiting the use of a document which has been disclosed, even where the document has been read to or by the court, or referred to, at a hearing which has been held in public. This development may also make avoiding litigation more attractive in some cases.

What may a non-partly potentially obtain?

Without permission:

- statements of case (claim form, particulars of claim, defence, reply to defence, counterclaim, further information given in relation to them, although not documents filed with, attached or intended to be served with them) (CPR 5.4C(1));

- judgment or order given in public (CPR 5.4C(1));

- transcript of proceedings heard in public subject to a fee (in private a non-party may apply for an order) (CPR 39.9); and

- witness statements which stand as evidence in chief unless the court directs otherwise, during the trial (CPR 32.13(1)).

Under the courts' inherent jurisdiction, subject to passing the balancing act test, following Cape v Dring (and authorities referred to in that case):

- copies of witness statements after the trial and documents without which it is not possible to understand the statement;

- expert reports treated as evidence in chief and documents without which it is not possible to understand the statement or report;

- written submissions and skeleton arguments, plus other documents submitted to the court to assist understanding such as chronologies, dramatis personae, and reading lists, providing there was an effective public hearing at which they were deployed;

- documents placed before the court and referred to during the hearing.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions