UK: The Philosophy Of Insolvency Rescues

Last Updated: 16 July 2009
Article by Philip Wood

The current financial crisis is likely to bring in its train a re-examination of corporate rescue statutes as a way of protecting the economy and it is worth reviewing where we have got to on this topic internationally.

Insolvency does not mean insolvency proceedings.  By far the great majority of financial problems are resolved by a private restructuring outside the courts, known as work-outs.  Nobody knows the proportion of work-outs to judicial rescues or liquidations internationally, but there is no question that they are the preferred course for both debtors and creditors if at all possible. 

Work-outs avoid the trauma of formal insolvency proceedings which cause credit to dry up and which deter new business.  They avoid a loss of control by both management and creditors to a court or administrator.  They avoid the forcible stays on creditor rights (which may include, depending on the jurisdiction, stays on set-off, taking and enforcing security and contract terminations).  They keep the group together.  They avoid the examination of management, greater public scrutiny and the delays, formality, cost and tactical litigation typical of court proceedings.  Security for old and new money to support the company is easier to take.

Also, whatever you call the insolvency proceeding in most countries, it inevitably sparks off termination clauses in leases and contracts and any resulting close-outs and cancellations.  Formal proceedings are generally a last resort. 

Liquidation is the stroke of midnight for everybody, the final guillotine.

On the other hand, they might be unavoidable.  This will be the case if there are hold-out creditors who will not agree to a work-out, or there are desperate junior creditors who do not realise they have lost everything, or disgruntled shareholders who have a veto, e.g. against a debt-equity conversion or a large disposal, or the issues are too complex to be worked out before the company runs out of money.  There can be just too many conflicts – between creditors in laddered tranches, or creditors with credit protection, or labour unions or pension trustees with blocking rights.

Of course the decision may be taken out of the hands of creditors and management by reason of rules imposing personal liability on directors if they deepen the insolvency by not stopping early enough or by reason of rules imposing a duty on them to file once the company is insolvent. 

Liquidation is the stroke of midnight for everybody, the final guillotine.  It is very rare for liquidation to have advantages over judicial rescues or work-outs.

Some jurisdictions have half-way houses between judicial rescues and private work-outs.  These include  official umpires (France), and "voluntary" codes of conduct for work-outs, prompted by the authorities.  These were based on the "London Approach" initiated in the 1970s and are found in Indonesia, Turkey, Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand and elsewhere.  They are official arm-twisting, soft law.

It was rather late during the Roman Empire that the Romans concluded that a composition could be a better way of getting paid than enslaving or imprisoning the debtor.  Much later, judicial compositions were enacted in 19th century Europe but were little used, apart from the 1870 English corporate scheme of arrangement.  The Great Depression accelerated judicial rescues around the world but it was only in the last quarter of the 20th century that the judicial rescue really took off, including the celebrated Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code of 1978. 

The proliferation is shown by the map below: Corporate insolvency rescue statutes.  This displays in red the countries which have a modern corporate rescue statute, i.e. a statute with low entry criteria, with stays on creditor attachments and liquidation petitions, and with creditor voting on a plan. 

Since the map was drawn, in September 2007, there have been quite a few changes or proposed changes.  For example, Greece has a new rescue statute, Hong Kong is considering re-introducing a rescue statute after an aborted attempt a few years ago, and so are the Netherlands.  But Luxembourg is one of the few advanced countries which remains unconvinced.  Luxembourg has the highest per capita income in the world.

It will be seen that practically the whole world outside sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East has a judicial rescue statute.  In the Middle East bankruptcy statutes are somewhat thin, probably because of the Sharia objection to interest.

Nevertheless, these rescue statutes vary enormously in terms of their impact on creditors.  They differ especially on such  matters as the stay on security enforcement, on set-off and on contract cancellations, the degree of creditor control (as opposed to control by management or the court), incentives imposed on directors to petition, the application of preference rules, the ability to novate contracts (available in the U.S. and France) and the method of voting on plans. 

The chart below shows some of the differences.  This chart is broken down into three panels comprising common law, Roman-Germanic and Napoleonic groups of illustrative jurisdictions.  It will be seen that, although these groups are more or less true to their original inspiration, there is nevertheless significant fragmentation within the groups.

When Chapter 11 was first drafted, it was considered extremely debtor-protective, a creature of the 1970s.  That is still more or less true compared to the models in, say, Britain, China, Japan and Germany.  Nevertheless there are other versions which are even more debtor-protective, at least on paper, such as France, Spain and Kazakhstan. 

Any significant erosion of creditor rights increases transaction disruption, unpredictability and international legal complexity.

One of the great conundrums is why the rate of take-up of judicial reorganisations is quite high in the U.S., but very low in France – around 7%, at least before the recent introduction of the French safeguard procedure.  The answer probably has to do firstly with the fact that in the U.S. public bondholders cannot be bound to a change in the terms of payment by majority vote (apart from a minor exception for interest) since this is contrary to the Trustee Indenture Act of 1939.  Apart from various other inefficient strategies, binding dissentient minority bondholders can only be done by a Chapter 11 plan.

Further, in France there are three other factors – both creditors and management lose control to the all-powerful court, the stays are very adverse to creditors, and directors are often made personally liable if there are insolvency proceedings (not so in the U.S.).  So in France, both banks and management are discouraged from entering a proceeding.  That may not be a wrong result.  But in France the reluctance of the participants is countered by a director duty to file on a continuing cessation of payments.  In any event, the idea that the U.S. has a bold entrepreneurial culture which is not present  in France and which is symptomised by a positive American enjoyment of going into Chapter 11 is probably just another piece of myth-making.  For example, the big U.S. car companies are hardly showing enthusiasm for filing.

The overall approach to judicial organisations involves complex policy judgements.  The argument is not whether they are useful – it is considered that they are.  The argument is how draconian the impact on creditor rights and transactions generally should be.  Reorganisations must, as a minimum, impose a stay on creditor executions and on liquidation petitions.  So the issue is whether those limited stays are enough or whether the law should be more intrusive, e.g. by the imposition of more dramatic stays on security enforcement, on the repossession of title finance assets, on set-off and on contract cancellations, and by the conferring of a forced priority on new money subordinating existing creditors without their consent. 

Any significant erosion of creditor rights increases transaction disruption, unpredictability and  international legal complexity.  It can lead to protectionism and international collisions.  Some judicial rescue statutes were intended not to maximise creditor returns but to redistribute on insolvency by effectively using bank and bondholder money to pay out other favoured creditors, such as employees and trade suppliers.  Others were attempts by the retreating state to continue to micromanage the economy via the puppetry of the legal regime.  In the end, somebody loses, somebody is demoted.  On insolvency, there is no free lunch.

Until now, reorganisations have not been mainstream in many advanced jurisdictions outside the U.S., except in mega cases where often they are used as a slow motion liquidation with a quick sale of viable assets followed by a groaning winding-up of the rest over many long years.  In some countries, reorganisations seem to be used in less than 10% of the cases compared to liquidation.  This must point to a very high proportion of work-outs. 

One leaves aside corporate receiverships in English-based jurisdictions.  Those are basically the enforcement of a universal security interests by a possessory manager appointed by the secured creditor followed usually by a private sale – a highly successful device in practice.  These universal security interests are much less common for the commanding heights of the economy – public companies.

On the whole, it seems that creditors favour work-outs if they are achievable and prefer not to involve the court.   That is also very obviously the view of management.  This is the minimalist approach that the court is needed only as a fall-back where it is necessary to bind hold-out creditors, e.g. by a pre-packaging.  A pre-packaging is a pre-negotiated private plan forced through by a judicial plan if minority creditors do not agree. 

In other words, restructurings are carried out, not by the law but in the shadow of the law.  The law is used as a menacing force to induce agreement and consensus.  It is the dark bulk lurking behind the curtain, axe in hand.  That is as it should be.  The idea that court involvement should be positively encouraged by the law in priority to private work-outs, e.g. by forcing directors into proceedings or by imposing the more dramatic creditor stays, could be the least efficient approach and the least welcome to creditors and corporates.

Map: Corporate insolvency rescue statutes

 

Chart: Corporate insolvency rescue statutes

Maps are from Philip Wood's Maps of World Financial Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 2008)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.