UK: Senior Accounting Officer Sign Off – The Draft Guidance - Does It Square The Circle?

Last Updated: 10 July 2009
Article by Deloitte Tax Group

Most Read Contributor in UK, August 2017

From the day of the Budget announcement of a new responsibility for Senior Accounting Officers (SAOs) to sign off on the quality of systems underlying the production of tax returns, there have been many points of debate between HM Treasury and HMRC on the one hand and business and the accounting firms on the other. Possibly the most sensitive has been the extent to which this measure created a new (unnecessary) burden on business, leading to additional cost.

From the very first round of discussions between the government and business it has been clear that HMRC were trying hard to square a circle – to implement the policy objectives of the measure without creating an additional burden on compliant businesses.

During post Budget debate, Ministers have made clear that this new measure is designed to protect tax revenues in difficult times, ensuring that tax compliance is on the Boardroom agenda, and that all business takes seriously the need to have systems and processes that can calculate and file accurate tax liabilities. Ministers and senior HMRC officials have said that they do not see that this will create any additional work for "responsible" businesses, even though they have introduced a powerful and unprecedented new penalty for failure – a £5,000 fine to be charged personally on the SAO.

It appears that the hope and intention of Ministers and HMRC is that SAOs simply sign the appropriate certificate on the understanding that things are probably well managed and that they have faith in their CRM to treat them fairly and in accordance with HMRC's strategic objectives of having open, trusting and risk based relationships with taxpayers.

It appears therefore that the Government want to have their cake and eat it – to enforce close attention to tax systems through a powerful sanction, but at the same time to give comfort that business probably doesn't have to do any more than it is currently doing. Since the Budget, HMRC has been drafting guidance with contributions from business representatives and the accounting profession which has now been published in draft.

The guidance will be finalised at the end of July in time for the operation of the rules beginning in August for July year end companies.

Has the draft HMRC guidance succeeded in squaring the circle for Ministers? And what is the outlook for how the guidance will operate in practice once CRMs and businesses engage using the revised legislation and guidance? It is Deloitte's view that that the draft guidance leaves a number of questions unanswered and hasn't succeeded in avoiding the SAO measure becoming a new compliance burden. This is largely because the key points of the policy leading to the legislation fundamentally and practically change the rules of the tax compliance game. However, HMRC has had to write the guidance on the basis that it does not, and that not much has changed. This was always likely to be Mission Impossible.

The policy objectives

Whether or not it is right that CFOs should take personal responsibility for accurate tax returns, the fact is we now have personal liability to certify that fact. Nearly 90% of CFOs surveyed by Deloitte (see ) said that incurring a penalty would be a serious blow to their reputation and career prospects, notwithstanding the fact that they would ask their employer to pay the £5,000 penalty. This risk means that CFOs will require, almost without exception, that more work is done to assure them of compliance than was done in the past.

Scope and coverage

The rules have been amended to catch only those companies who have a CRM in place, as to operate the regime it is necessary to rely on the judgement and experience of the senior officials who lead the relationship between HMRC and taxpayers. The CRM programme is seen as key to implementing HMRC policies such as the 'Varney' measures (the output from the 2006 Review of Links with Large Business chaired by Sir David Varney, the former Chairman of HMRC) and is being gradually extended to smaller businesses.

It seems logical that over time the definition of 'qualifying company' will change to include smaller groups and companies and potentially those other forms of business, notably LLPs and branches of foreign companies, which are currently excluded.

Who is the Senior Accounting Officer?

It remains clear from both the legislation and the guidance that the SAO should be the CFO. In complex situations, especially inbound businesses with many points of entry into the UK, there is provision for this to be someone other than the group CFO, and one person can take responsibility for more than one division where this reflects reality. The draft guidance does contain the words "as appropriately delegated". This appears to allow HMRC to say that a business could not delegate the responsibility where that was not "appropriate" e.g. it could only be the Financial Controller if the CFO was not actually responsible for the financial systems. Overall, the policy objective of putting tax responsibility on the Boardroom agenda has not changed, but flexibility has been introduced where this is needed.


The guidance introduces an apparent concession – whilst there is no transitional period, all the SAO appears to have to do in year one is begin to consider if the business has appropriate arrangements. If the business does not have appropriate tax accounting arrangements, the SAO should declare this on the certificate. Although apparently a concession, this is unlikely to be a popular option for many. The personal penalty for failure to meet the main duty would not be triggered but the adverse reputational impact of confirming that the company's tax accounting arrangements were inadequate would remain. Also, such a disclosure would potentially have adverse implications for the company's risk rating and would certainly mean that HMRC would need to consider whether to impose penalties on the company under the normal penalty regime. Given the potential downside, few will want to make such a declaration and so the effect is still likely to be that systems have to be good during year one.

Appropriate arrangements and reasonable steps

The guidance uses examples of what might be seen to be "good" or "bad", and in themselves these are helpful. However, the examples are clearly not exhaustive or applicable to every business. The guidance has tried to give a "sense" of what is expected, and then allow business and CRMs to make up their own mind in their own context. This inherent uncertainty will be one of the hardest issues to deal with in the SAO regime, especially at a time when the Risk-based approach is still developing and CRMs themselves are still getting to grips with applying the new guidance regarding 'Governance and Delivery'. Business needs certainty, and for this to happen there needs to be a benchmark against which the SAO can test his or her processes. In its current form therefore, the guidance will have to iterate substantially to deal with the many unanswered or subjective questions. Business will ask their auditors to give them assurance that they are compliant – the auditors (internal and external) will ask to what standard they should be testing. If HMRC do not produce a robust benchmark then business will have to do it for them.

Its easy to see why this was resisted in the development of the guidance –HMRC is genuinely trying to avoid the measure causing significant burden. However, the measure will cause extra compliance costs and efforts, and all parties should recognise that this will happen. Most business, their advisers and auditors will be thinking about what forms of documentation will be necessary to give assurance and allow sign off and testing. HMRC has not given an opinion on whether they feel documentation of processes and systems is a useful thing. Most businesses will almost certainly seek to document the critical processes and risks, and create a sign off process as, in reality, this is how risk management and audit processes work. At the very least, the guidance should give a view to CRMs on whether documentation is an indication of good accounting arrangements.

Accurate in all material respects

What does this mean? The guidance is clear that is does not mean audit materiality, and the consequence of this is that it is still the case that SAOs need to recognise that they cannot rely on the testing their auditors perform. HMRC say that this is not a new standard – tax returns have always needed to be accurate, and of course this is true. The consequences of getting this wrong though have become much more acute however, and the natural risk based response of business will be to do more testing and build in greater assurance over critical processes.

The examples in the guidance are helpful in this area, although of course subject to interpretation by CRMs and business alike. The interpretation of "in all material respects" is likely to be both quantitative (i.e. is it a significant number in the context of the transaction, tax and business) and qualitative (i.e. is this something the business really should have got 100% right without excuse).

Tax Compliance Risk Management Process

The area of the guidance where the interaction with TCRM is covered is possibly the most disappointing. There is no guarantee that a low risk rating equals SAO compliance. HMRC should give more weight to the work that both business and CRMs have already done in risk assessment and formally treat a "tends to reduce risk" rating for the "Delivery" area as a clearance to sign off the SAO certificate. Most importantly for future operation of the new regime, there is no discussion of how SAO will work with the penalties regime, and the guidance does not appear entirely consistent with messages regarding systems errors included within the Compliance Handbook (eg CH81145) .

Key questions remain – for example, where an audit or enquiry discovers an underpayment, the penalty regime requires consideration of the systems and processes and the capability of suspending the penalty. If the tax at stake is worth charging a penalty on, or the error is "careless", does that guarantee a £5,000 SAO penalty? Arguably it could, as the return would surely not be accurate, and the business was careless as opposed to taking reasonable steps. In that case, we can expect a very high number of SAO penalties to be issued. That outcome doesn't appear to be HMRC's intention however, so how will the CRM distinguish between something careless and something worthy of being deemed to result from inappropriate systems? Many other questions remain about the interaction of enquiries, audits, penalties and the new SAO regime. Unless there is clarity in the SAO guidance and in the Compliance Handbook, CRMs and business will be confused.

Further developments needed

The guidance as it stands represents the best efforts of HMRC, assisted by business to square the circle of implementing a high impact policy in a low impact way. In some areas, it provides helpful commonsense assistance. It seems likely though that revision will be needed as businesses, CRMs and others use it in reality. The pressure to change will be rapid and immediate as soon as CRMs start considering imposing career threatening penalties on the CFOs of UK businesses – both sides are likely to ask for something more to help them decide where they stand. The inconsistencies between the SAO guidance, the TCRM and the penalties regime will need to be resolved. The scope of the legislation will also most likely broaden and deepen to include smaller and other forms of enterprise, either unofficially or officially. Internal auditors will have another key area of business risk to provide assurance on, and tax will be added to existing business risk and sign off frameworks, albeit operating a different level of materiality.

We believe that forward looking businesses will use the effort of compliance to optimise their ability to manage information, allowing them to manage taxes more efficiently, the savings from which will outweigh the cost. But in the meantime it remains the case that this measure will cause businesses to do more work and increase the compliance burden associated with managing tax in the UK.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.