UK: Insurance/Reinsurance Bulletin – July, 2009

Last Updated: 14 July 2009

By Kapil Dhir

Over the past 18 months, the FSA has demonstrated an increased willingness to take strong action when financial institutions do not comply with applicable regulatory standards. Our experience is that the FSA's well-trailed shift to a more active enforcement strategy with increasing financial penalties and prosecutions must be treated with the utmost respect.

As a prelude to any enforcement action, the FSA will probably have exercised its powers under Part XI of the Financial Services and Market Act 2000 ("FiSMA") ("Information Gathering and Investigations"). The FSA's ability to require the provision of information and documents is central to its investigative powers for the purpose of enforcement.

Collecting Information

Under Section 165 of FiSMA, the FSA can require authorised persons to provide information or documents that are "reasonably required" in connection with the exercise of its functions (S165(4)). The FSA can specify the form that the information is to take (S165(5)).

The scope of this information gathering power is greatly enhanced because information can be required of any person who has at any time been authorised or is "connected with" the authorised person (for example another part of the authorised person's group). Further, if the FSA (or an investigator - see below) finds that a relevant document is in the possession of a third party, the power to require information may also be exercised against that third party (S175(1)).

Privileged and Protected Items

Under Section 413 of FiSMA, a person is not required to produce "protected items". Protected items include communications between a professional legal adviser and his client, or any person representing his client (i) in connection with the giving of legal advice to the client or (ii) in connection with, or in contemplation of legal proceedings, and for the purpose of those proceedings.

Who can Exercise the Power and How?

Note that the FSA can exercise its information gathering powers in one of two ways: either directly by notice in writing to the authorised person (S165(1)), or via an officer who has written authority from the FSA (S165(3)). Information has to be provided either before the end of a "reasonable period", or without delay in such form as the FSA requires (S165(5)).

Overseas Regulators

Under Section 169 of FiSMA, the FSA can gather information where it has received a request from an overseas regulator. The FSA has the same powers to gather information as it has under Section 165. The FSA can take account of factors which include whether the country of the overseas regulator would give corresponding assistance to the UK Regulatory Authority in deciding whether or not to exercise its investigative powers in support of that overseas regulator (S165(4)).

Skilled Persons Reports

Under Section 166, the FSA can by notice in writing require a range of persons (including an authorised person, any other member of that authorised person's group, a partnership of which the authorised person is a member or any person who has at any relevant time been any one of them) to provide the FSA with a report on any matter in respect of which the FSA has required, or could require the provision of information.

The person writing the report must be an appropriately skilled person. Note that such reports by skilled persons will be for the cost of the authorised person, and the authorised person is obliged to provide all reasonable support to the skilled person. This power is often used in the production of investigations into cash management and cash balances.


In short, it is important to be aware of the wide scope of the information gathering powers under FiSMA, the exercise of which is likely to become even more frequent in the current climate.

By Andrew Carpenter

1 October 2009 is the final implementation date for the Companies Act 2006. A number of significant provisions will come into force on that date. These include:

  • Rules relating to authorised and nominal share capital are abolished. Companies should consider amending their articles to remove reference to the authorised share capital thereby allowing freedom to allot shares beyond that ceiling.
  • Registers of directors and particulars provided by directors will no longer need to state the names of other companies of which the director is or has been a director.
  • Directors' private residential addresses will no longer appear on the public register although existing addresses on the register will remain.
  • A company's articles will be able to provide methods of changing the company's name other than by a special resolution and where a company changes its name, its articles will be deemed to be amended so far as references to the name are concerned, so that no actual amendment will be required.
  • A company's memorandum of association will no longer set out the company's objects. These will be unrestricted for new companies and existing companies may amend their memorandum to opt out of this provision. Unless a company's articles specifically restrict the objects of the company, its objects will be unrestricted.

A full list of the provisions can be found in The Companies Act 2006 (Commencement No. 8, Transitional Provisions and Savings) Order 2008 at:

By Kapil Dhir & Andrew Carpenter

Insurance Premium Tax

In Homeserve GB Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners ([2009] EWHC 1311 (Ch)), Homeserve appealed against a decision that part of an arrangement and administration fee paid by an insured to Homeserve under an "assistance insurance" scheme was to be taxed as insurance premium.

Under the scheme, Homeserve located an insurer, negotiated terms of cover with that insurer and then offered to the public the insurance-backed service which, if taken up, it then administered. When the homeowner took out cover, two contracts were entered into, one with Homeserve and the other with the insurer. Under the contract with the homeowner, Homeserve, charged a fee which it did not account for to the insurer.

The tribunal considered the wording used in s.72(1A)(b) Finance Act 1994 and concluded that the tax was intended to be levied on the premium received by an insurer under a contract of insurance. If therefore a payment made under a contract with an intermediary, and not under the contract of insurance, was disclosed to the policyholder as an amount separate from the premium, and was never received by the insurer, there was no evident reason why the payment should be taxed as being part of the premium.


In our March 2009 bulletin we examined the case of LeadX v HMRC ([2009] S.T.I. 448) and the potential impact on intermediaries and aggregators as regards their VAT position. The position remains unclear as demonstrated in Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners ([2009] EWHC 999 (Ch)) where the court concluded (taking the opposite view to the VAT tribunal conclusions in LeadX) that companies offering introductory services to channel potential customers to insurers by electronic means who receive a consequent commission where an insurance contract was concluded, are insurance brokers or insurance agents falling within the VAT exemption.

A link to the law report is at:>

We will continue to follow developments in this area, but it is obvious that more clarity is required.

By Geoffrey Conlin

Karafarin Bank v Gholamreza Mansoury-Dara [2009] EWHC 1217 (Comm)

The defendant applied to stay proceedings in England on the grounds that there were concurrent proceedings in Iran or, in the alternative, that the proceedings should be stayed pending the conclusion of the concurrent proceedings in Iran. Both the primary and alternative applications were dismissed by Teare J.

The claimant bank had brought proceedings in England for sums due on 13 cheques. The defendant was unaware that the claimant had, before commencing the English proceedings, obtained civil and criminal judgments from the Iranian Courts on 4 of those cheques. The defendant had the criminal conviction set aside and appealed to the Iranian Court against the civil judgments on the 4 cheques.

The defendant applied to have the English proceedings stayed. The application was brought on the following grounds:

  1. The claimant was abusing the process of the Court by bringing proceedings on all 13 cheques when they had already commenced proceedings and obtained judgment against the defendant in respect of 4 cheques. Reliance was placed on Australian Commercial Research and Development Ltd which held that the effect of pursuing the same defendant in two jurisdictions is vexatious and oppressive.
  2. The proceedings in Iran were lis alibi pendens (dispute elsewhere pending) and the English proceedings should be stayed pursuant to the principle in The Abidin Daver:

    "... the additional inconvenience and expense which must result from two sets of legal proceedings to be pursued concurrently in two different countries ... can only be justified if the would-be plaintiff can establish objectively by cogent evidence that there is some personal or juridical advantage that would be available to him only in the English action that is of such importance that it would cause injustice to him to deprive him of it"
  3. In support of the alternative application for a stay pending the Iranian appeal, reliance was placed on Section 34 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 ("the CJJA") and case management considerations. Section 34 provides that a claimant, having obtained judgment in his favour from an overseas Court, cannot bring proceedings in England on the same cause of action and between the same parties, unless that judgment is not enforceable or entitled to recognition in England.

On the abuse of process argument, the judge held that the continuation of the English proceedings was not an abuse of process because the Iranian judgment could not be enforced in England since it was obtained in the absence of the defendant and in circumstances where he would not have been regarded as having submitted to the jurisdiction. Fresh proceedings in England were therefore necessary and permitted by section 34 of the CJJA. Also, the judgment in Iran extended to 4 of the 13 cheques only. Furthermore, no application for a stay had been made earlier.

On the lis alibi pendens argument, the Judge held that the ability to enforce an English judgment against the assets of the defendant in England is a legitimate "juridical advantage" that is only open to the claimant in England (there being no assets in Iran) and is of sufficient importance that it would cause the claimant injustice to deprive him of it.

Furthermore, the defendant had delayed in making the application and the claimant had been acting in the London action pursuant to the directions of the Court. Therefore, the judge held that case management considerations were very strongly in favour of permitting the English trial to go ahead, rather than in staying the proceedings. A decision from the Iranian proceedings would take 1-2 years and the English trial is to go ahead in July 2009.

Additionally, it was not certain that, by appealing, the defendant had retrospectively submitted to the jurisdiction of the Iranian Court and that the Iranian judgment would become enforceable in the UK.

The key lesson to be drawn from this case is that defendants applying to stay English proceedings must act expeditiously. The Judge also made it clear that a tactical delay in making an application was unacceptable.

By Simon Sloane and Julian Teoh

Farm Assist Ltd (in liq) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (No 2) [2009] EWHC 1102

The law pertaining to confidential and privileged information disclosed in mediation has been clarified in a recent judgement by Ramsey, J.

The claimant sought to set aside a settlement agreement entered into at mediation on the grounds that the settlement was entered into under economic duress. The parties agreed that there was no bar to taking a witness statement from the mediator. The defendant served a witness summons on the mediator which the mediator applied to set aside.

After an analysis of the authorities, Ramsey, J. summarised the position generally as follows:

  1. Confidentiality – there is an implied duty of confidentiality in mediation between the parties and between the parties and the mediator so the mediator can enforce the confidentiality provision even if the parties have waived confidentiality. However, where it is in the interests of justice the court can permit the use of, or order disclosure of, the otherwise confidential material.
  2. Privilege – privilege in mediation is derived from the 'without prejudice' nature of the mediation proceedings. This privilege exists as between the parties and is not a privilege of the mediator and as such the parties can waive this privilege.
  3. Other privileges – if another privilege attaches to documents which are produced by a party and shown to a mediator, the party retains that privilege and it is not waived by disclosure to the mediator or by waiver of the 'without prejudice' privilege.

Ramsey, J denied the application to set the witness summons aside on the interests of justice exception.

Ramsey, J's findings on the nature of confidential and/or privileged information in mediation, particularly that the Mediator is able to enforce the confidentiality of the proceedings, surpasses the current standard of confidentiality as set out in Article 7 of the EU Directive on Mediation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions