UK: Changing Directions

Last Updated: 25 July 2019
Article by Craig Beeston

The latest in ICSA's thought leadership series is 'The Future of Sports Governance – Beyond Autonomy' which assesses the implications of various pressures on the concept of sporting autonomy

The past couple of decades have seen enormous changes in the sector, both in terms of on-field performance and in sport's place in the wider business, political and social landscapes. Interest and involvement in sports organisations now extends across sectoral boundaries, and stakeholder groups are far more numerous and diverse than the members who originally formed the associations, with the result that demands placed on sports bodies are greater and more multi-directional than ever before.

In October 2016, the introduction of the mandatory Code for Sports Governance heralded an overhaul of governance in the UK publicly funded sports sector, challenging bodies invested in not only to revise their governing structures and practices, but also in some cases to reassess the principles of self-determination which to a significant degree have defined the sector's approach to its governance, and which still hold some sway.

The Future of Sports Governance – Beyond Autonomy assesses the implications of all of these pressures on the concept of sporting autonomy – essentially the position that sport is unlike other areas of the economy, occupies a unique role in society, should be treated differently and essentially be left, within reason, to run itself. It is a concept with its roots in the associational origins of many sports' governing bodies and in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century liberalism.

Sport's contention that it is a special case begins to suffer when the argument is reduced to two questions. Do you deal with money? Do you deal with people? The answer to both is yes.

Though advocates for autonomy contend that sport is not an economic activity like any other, it is nevertheless an economic activity. In the modern world of funding agreements, sponsorship and licensing rights, significant money – including public funds – can pass through certain sports bodies, with jobs, livelihoods and investments hinging on performance on and off the field of play. And of course many of those people in contact with sport are among our most potentially vulnerable. These considerations make how the organisations are run a primary concern.

Sport's Roles

The claims which the sport sector makes of its reach and potential impact are well-founded. Almost a quarter of the population over 16 engage in sporting activities. 75 million people attended professional sports events in the UK in 2017. Physical activity contributes an estimated £39 billion to the economy each year.

The importance that successive governments have attached to the sector for these reasons – and for the more intangible benefits of prestige, pride and political opportunism – is reflected in the investment made from the public purse. The central government committed £6.25 billion to staging the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, with a further £2 billion coming from the National Lottery. In excess of £1 billion of Exchequer and Lottery funds was invested in elite and grassroots sport prior to the Rio Games in 2016.

Sport is also being increasingly used as a policy tool, supporting a range of social and political priorities. From tackling medical and societal trends to encouraging community cohesion and economic stimulation, the sector as a whole and individual organisations are being called upon to deliver in areas that could not have been envisaged at their foundation. This has given rise to an almost inevitable conflict. Sport is being asked to fulfil more roles and contribute to wider objectives and is being provided with significant sums of public money to do this. Yet elements of the sector remain insular, protective of their autonomy and continue to argue for special status.

Qualified Autonomy

Even where a special case is made for sport, conditions have usually been attached. The IOC's Thomas Bach has referred to 'responsible autonomy', whereby sport exercises its independence in accordance with the rules of good governance. Similarly, former FIFA president, Sepp Blatter, asserted that autonomy from external influences 'brings with it the obligation for good governance by the sporting authorities, promoting transparency and open-mindedness'.

The irony of these pronouncements coming from such institutions is not lost. Yet the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers too noted that the legitimacy and autonomy of sport depend on upholding the highest standards of ethical behaviour and good governance, adding that public authorities have a key role to play in promoting the implementation of such principles.

The Code for Sports Governance

This has proven to be the case in the UK. The introduction of the Code for Sports Governance, in part to protect public investment, with its mandatory compliance requirement – the first in the UK and a move dubbed 'comply or else' – represents definitively the end of autonomy, at least for funded organisations. In its place is a form of earned autonomy. The sector in the UK now has a formal agreement that public money will only be granted in return for individually specified governance standards being met.

The rate of compliance with the Code has been taken as a success. This is certainly true to a point. The speed with which governing bodies ushered through the required governance reforms, including constitutional changes in some cases, could be argued to point to a desire to improve the way in which they are run. It could also suggest an over-reliance on public funding which raises concerns as to future sustainability.

The true mark of success will be in the implementation of long-term, sustainable change borne out of cultural maturity rather than an immediate response to the financial sword of Damocles. A mandatory code, armed with powerful cash levers, can certainly set in train positive governance developments. Yet there remains the concern that it risks undermining a genuine culture of good practice, even embedding a tick-box mentality.

Negative inducements such as funding withdrawal must be balanced with the promotion and incentivisation of good practice and, crucially, the support needed to implement these. The funding bodies – UK Sport and Sport England – recognise this and the next phase of the Code's lifecycle appears to be to move beyond compliance and focus on driving governance improvement in the sector. Ensuring that governance cultures, attitudes and mind-sets keep pace with compliance will be essential to the long-term implementation of the Code and good practice more generally.

Network Accountability

What the Code seems to have done is alter the locus and direction of accountability for compliant organisations. Traditionally, many governing bodies were membership associations. For those which still vested primacy for decision making in their councils, the requirement that this be transferred to a board represented a significant shift, with an impact perceived by some on democracy and legitimacy, particularly when combined with minimum numbers for independent non-executive directors – seen in certain quarters as 'outsiders'. That this was achieved so quickly again raises questions about a dependency on public investment.

But if accountability now seems to be upwards, rather than back down to clubs and members, it is also external. In fact, the trend is towards a form of network accountability where pressures are felt from multiple directions as more and more stakeholders are involved. In part, this is due to sport's widening role, but also because governing bodies are now membership organisations, employers, property rights holders, commercial partners, community hubs and more – all at the same time. The attempts to tackle integrity threats provide just one example of the modern landscape.

Combatting ever more sophisticated incursions which are no respecters of jurisdiction requires a transnational, multi-agency response. As the threats grow and evolve, so too must this interaction.

Diversity and Inclusion

The goal for sports bodies must be the attainment of parity – of opportunity and of reward – so that the experiences of all involved in the sector is equal. The white, male hegemony is beginning to be challenged, but much progress remains to be made.

The Code received some criticism for setting a target for gender representation on boards but not for other under-represented sections of the population. Targets might offer some utility, but have their limitations. They can be met in the short term – by reducing board size or parachuting in talent from other sectors. The challenge for sports bodies will be to create their own pathways. This will require a shift in still deep-seated perceptions of leadership, as well as the provision of support and encouragement, and defined routes of progression to senior positions.

On the gender issue alone, new thinking will be required. The future ahead of sports bodies is a non-binary one. Competition, participation, facilities and representation must take into account greater fluidity and nuance in gender issues. Much of this is emerging and responses to it are untested.

A wider perspective needs to be adopted with regard to diversity in general, extending the focus beyond gender and ethnicity, and even beyond the protected characteristics of the Equality Act.To flourish, sports bodies – in common with others – must embrace challenge, novel approaches and diverse thinking.

Future Challenges

This is all the more essential given the waters all organisations must navigate in the future.

The government has signalled that public investment in sports governing bodies will be reduced. So for funded bodies as well as those not in receipt of public monies, diversification of income and the exploitation of commercial opportunities will become more pressing concerns. This will require some business nous. Corporate entities also often have in place more sophisticated governance and integrity structures and expect them to be matched in their sporting partners.

In a competitive market, all sports must vie for participants, support and custom, as the recent trend towards re-booted formats illustrates. This is not without its pitfalls. And for those sports where broadcast revenue is an option, this too is seemingly in flux as audiences fragment (and in some cases fall) and new media players enter the picture. This will impact how rights deals are negotiated and how value is derived.

All this makes it essential that the boards of sports bodies are equipped with the skills, experience, diverse perspectives and entrepreneurial instinct to meet these challenges, exploit the opportunities ahead and reach out to the broadest communities in order to sustain themselves long term.

There is also the fundamental question of what sport is for, given the multiplicity of roles it now fulfils. At the participatory level, what value is placed on outcome? The debate around elite funding in the UK rightly queried whether numerous incidences of adverse behaviour were the consequence of a single-minded pursuit of success and whether current investment destinations were the most equitable and warranted.

A Hopeful Future?

In a sector that has sometimes been resistant to change, the impetus for it can come from within. Fans and participants want well-run sports, for now and for the future. Governing bodies themselves want to secure their long-term viability and avoid negative publicity. Couple these with external pressures and the leverage of the mandatory code and the path for improved governance becomes somewhat clearer.

Sport needs to be realistic about what can be achieved and within what timescale. In certain respects, it was starting from further back than some sectors. The key tests for the future may hinge on creating proportionate and sustainable responses to the challenges – those current and those evolving – that it faces. 

The Future of Sports Governance – Beyond Autonomy was launched at Manchester Metropolitan University in May at an event attended by invited guests and the students of the Master of Sport Directorship course. Following a presentation of the report, Craig Beeston was joined by ICSA chief executive Simon Osborne, sports lawyer and consultant Kevin Carpenter and MMU's Sara Ward for a panel discussion and audience questions.

Find out more icsa.org.uk/knowledge/resources/future-of-sports-governance

Craig Beeston is Policy Officer, not for profit at ICSA: The Governance Insitute

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions