UK: Legal Developments In The Credit Hire Market

Last Updated: 25 June 2009
Article by Fiona Butler, Andrew Christon and Angela Wilkes

When the Court of Appeal gave their judgment in the case of "Clark v Ardington (2002)", did they anticipate that 7 years on the court system would once more become flooded with claims or did they expect their judgment to put a nail in the coffin of credit hire litigation?

Background

The first attack on the credit hire industry took place 15 years ago with the case of Giles v Thompson and the allegation that credit hire agreements were champertous : an argument which failed.

However in Dimond v Lovell (2002) the Law lords denounced that credit hire agreements were regulated agreements and if improperly executed were unenforceable against the hiree and could not therefore be recovered from the defendant.

The final challenge was mounted against the entire scheme, credit hire and repairs in the Clark v Ardington case. The Court of Appeal was clear: the scheme was not a pretence, sloppy enforcement was merely a commercial party choosing not to enforce their strict legal rights.

The remainder of the decision was framed in such a way that challenge to claims for credit hire seemed dead and buried. But with credit hire claims rising in not only cost but volume we take a look at the recent developments, practices and legal challenges facing the credit hire and motor insurance industries.

Enforceability

In the recent reported decision of Company Call Centre Technology Ltd v Sheehan* the appeal judge upheld an earlier decision to dismiss the claim for hire charges on the basis that there was no evidence that the claimant had a liability to pay the hire charges incurred. The claimant's employee had received the hire agreement together with its terms and conditions for signature 4 months after the hire period had ended and the replacement car had been returned.

Thus whilst the Court of Appeal may have firmly put to bed the allegation of pretence and enforceability, it would appear that commercial practice does not override the basic contractual principle that past consideration is not good consideration and the liability to pay hire charges still needs to be established and should not be overlooked, because sloppiness in sending documentation after a hire period has ended is not commercial practice that avoids legal principle.

Need

"The claimant must prove his need to hire a replacement vehicle although the burden will usually be easy to satisfy. Advocates will frequently remind you that the need for a hire car is not self proving" District Judge Paten advises his brethren in the winter edition of the District Judge's Law Bulletin reminding them of Giles v Thompson.

And herein lies the problem in challenging "need for hire". The burden of proof lies squarely with the claimant but is a fairly low threshold. However, perhaps that threshold is about to change.

The interventionist approach (adopted by more pro-active insurers) is widely thought to be changing the tide, raising the evidential bar for claimants who ignore alternatives to credit hire.

Innovative and practical methods are being deployed to provide otherwise "would be credit hirers" with real alternatives to credit hire. Probably the best known and most topical are the TNT drivers offering any Third Party motorist who is unfortunate enough to have an RTA with one of their lorries a free replacement vehicle.

On the face of it a genuine and real alternative, that saves cost and does not inconvenience the accident victim.

The court's approach to "need for hire" in the wake of the TNT Scheme and schemes like them remains to be seen. This type of scheme was considered by the Court of Appeal in May and we currently await its judgement. It presents the Appeal Court with a real opportunity to limit the claimant's damages to the actual cost of the replacement vehicle or possibly wiping out damages completely.

Insurers hope to see this type of scheme offering a genuine alternative to credit hire as a scheme recognised by the courts as an effective way of providing a replacement vehicle without incurring expensive credit hire charges.

Judges may also welcome clarification from the Appeal Court. Only recently before the District Judge sitting in Southampton were questions raised why motor insurers were not in more regular contact with the Third Party motorists to offer alternative schemes to credit hire. Well Judge – they are!

Hopefully both insurers and the judiciary will see more scheme's such as the TNT Scheme being utilised by motor insurers where third party replacement vehicles are provided quickly, cheaply and without inconvenience. Such schemes must then be the way forward and a genuine alternative to credit hire.

Impecuniosity

It is well versed that the reason for credit hire charges being more costly than the local hire rates is the cost of the 'convenience' services provided. According to the judge in Dimond v Lovell 'the law does not entitle the plaintiff to recover damages for additional services provided by the car hire company or for the worry or nuisance caused by the accident'.

However, if a claimant can show he or she is impecunious then they are entitled to recover the higher credit rate as opposed to the local rate. A point raised in the House of Lords case, Lagden v O'Connor. Impecunious signifies an inability to pay car hire charges without making sacrifices the claimant could not reasonably be expected to make.

It is standard practice for some courts to order and defendant lawyers to seek either by a Part 18 request or application for disclosure, details of the claimant's financial means.

Only recently in Southampton County Court, did a claimant struggle to recall what transactions he had made in 2005 which were listed in his current account bank statement. He faced questions about his savings and that of his wife, a named driver on the credit hire agreement. It is an uncomfortable place for a claimant to be.

The judge found that, despite the claimant's decision to change career and his unemployment at the point of the accident, he had the facility to obtain finance without placing an undue burden on his family, rejecting argument that alternative means of funding a replacement car would have been open ended and an unfair risk for the claimant.

Did the Law Lords envisage when raising the phrase 'impecunious' that trials before county court judges would become in the main investigations into the financial accounts of an innocent claimant motorist? Surely not. The issue of what renders someone impecunious in one geographical region may not be sufficient in another. Does it have any bearing whether your accident is in the North or South of the country? What about age? If you are a prudent 40-50 year old who has had a successful career, perhaps mortgage and child free, with little or no debt, then you are less likely to be impecunious than the 23 year old who is just out of university with student debt and a relatively modest income.

Whatever your view, the issue is now common place for lawyers and the respective industries but not for the innocent motorists who find themselves in court.

Period Of Hire And Contribution Claims

Following Clark v Ardington contesting the period of hire can often prove difficult. Mrs Clark's car repairs should have been completed within 5 days but due to factors beyond her control were completed in 10. The Court of Appeal recommended that if delay is caused by a repairing garage a defendant should seek a contribution for the unjustified length of repair.

But despite this recommendation, there remains much debate about whether a defendant can actually seek a contribution from the repairing garage within the ambit of the Civil Liability Contribution Act 1978. There are no reported cases where a defendant has been successful in doing so.

The issue recently came before the Court in Tiller v Green. The credit hire organisation (CHO) refused to compromise the claim for hire charges alleging that the repairing garage was responsible for the period of hire due to delay by failing to accurately estimate for the repairs, omitting areas of damage and quoting for the wrong parts. At trial the repairing garage established that they had followed the correct procedures and that it was the CHO who had failed to authorise the repairs, despite being chased by the garage on several occasions. The court found that once the repairs had been authorised they were carried out correctly and within a reasonable timeframe.

As a result the contribution proceedings were dismissed. The court found that the defendant's insurers were responsible for the hire charges only during the period of repair. The unreasonable delays in authorisation and the hire charges incurred during this period fell at the door of the CHO.

All is therefore not necessarily as it first may seem. Full enquiries and disclosure from the repairing garage made as early as possible, may result in a reduction in hire charges maybe not through contribution proceedings against the repairing garage but via highlighting delay in another quarter. It seems for the moment however that breaking the chain of causation in claims for lengthy hire periods remains difficult.

Conclusion

The challenges to credit hire charges are far from dead and buried. The awaited decision of the Appeal Court on refusal by a claimant of a free replacement vehicle by a defendant may well change the practice of the motor insurance industry in its entirety and place another nail in the coffin in credit hire litigation for now. In a further 15 years time no doubt there will be further challenges or issues which arise and are frequently being argued before the courts.

*The Credit Hire Team at Browne Jacobson acted for the defendant in Company Call Centre Technology Ltd v Sheehan.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions