UK: Playing The Blame Game: Withdrawing Admissions Of Liability

Withdrawing an admission of liability is not undertaken lightly, but is sometimes necessary.

In particular, it can be a very important tool for limiting claims spend where a claim that is originally presented within the fast track later becomes a larger loss claim once quantum evidence is gathered.

We explore below the judiciary's approach to applications for permission to withdraw admissions in these circumstances, including consideration of the recent appeal decision in The Royal Automobile Club v Catherine Wright [2019] EWHC 913 (QB).


The Civil Procedure Rules ("CPR") and accompanying Practice Direction ("PD") require a defendant to make an application to the court seeking permission to withdraw an admission of liability.

A pre-action admission can also be withdrawn if all parties consent or with court permission (if the matter has become litigated).

When considering an application for permission, the court will have regard to the factors listed in PD 14 para 7.2 namely:

  1. The grounds upon which the admission is to be withdrawn including whether or not new evidence has since come to light
  2. The parties' conduct
  3. The prejudice that may be caused if the admission is withdrawn or if it is refused
  4. The stage in the proceedings at which the application to withdraw is made
  5. The prospects of success of the claim if the admission is withdrawn
  6. The interests of the administration of justice

Furthermore, as with all case management decisions, the Court considers the 'overriding objective' of "enabling the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost".

Case law

The Royal Automobile Club v Catherine Wright [2019] EWHC 913 (QB)

The Defendant appealed a refusal of permission to withdraw a pre-action admission.

The Letter of Claim proposed obtaining evidence from orthopaedic, pain and psychiatry experts following fibula and tibia fractures and the alleged development of complex regional pain syndrome. The Defendant argued that the matter should be submitted via the Portal. The Claimant disagreed and the parties decided to leave quantum to one side. The Defendant then admitted liability following investigations.

The Claimant gathered medical evidence from the aforementioned experts and presented a Schedule of Loss valuing the claim around £1m.

The Defendant initially raised contributory negligence arguments, later seeking to withdraw the admission of liability entirely. The Claimant issued proceedings, relying on the admission.

The Defendant issued an application to withdraw the admission arguing new quantum evidence had come to light. The Master at first instance was unimpressed, as the Letter of Claim made clear that the claim was reasonably anticipated to be significantly in excess of Portal value. The Defendant also argued that the Claimant had indicated that the claim was of modest value, but the Master did not find this to be supported by pre-action correspondence.

The application to withdraw the admission was refused. The Defendant appealed, which was heard in the High Court by Mr Justice Davis.

The possibility of prejudice to both parties was noted, and Mr Justice Davis considered the administration of justice on a more holistic level. Prospects of success was a central consideration and he noted:

" seems to me that the prospects of success on either side were not such that it inevitably means that leave should be given to withdraw the admission."

The Claimant had legitimate prospects of success whereas the Defendant only sought to put the Claimant to proof on her factual and liability claim. The appeal was dismissed.

Woodland v Stopford [2011] EWCA Civ 266

This decision provided guidance from the Court of Appeal on how the PD 14 factors should be considered.

The Claimant complained that no reason was given for withdrawing the admission as no new evidence had come to light to justify it. The Court disagreed, stating that new evidence was not a prerequisite for an application for permission to withdraw an admission. The judge stated:

"A judge dealing with a case like this must have regard to each and every one of [the factors listed in paragraph 7.2 of Part 14] and give each and every one of them due weight... with a view to achieving the overriding objective. Cases will vary infinitely and the weight to be given to the relevant factors will inevitably vary from case to case."

Cavell v Transport for London [2015] EWHC 2283 (QB)

The application proposed that the admission was made in error. The Court found no evidence to support this. The judgment reiterated the impact of these applications on the administration of justice:

"It cannot be in those interests to permit the withdrawal of an admission made after mature reflection of a claim by highly competent professional advisors when there is not a scintilla of evidence to suggest that the admission was not properly made."

Moore v Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1209 (QB)

HJ Bidder QC distinguished Woodland where an admission had been made in error based on a "careless and cursory" reading of an expert report stating:

"The fact that this was a pure mistake is distinguishable from the situation where there is a tactical change of an admission. That is the significance of it being a genuine mistake."

The Court found that restricting a Defendant with a real defence (as here) may create additional satellite litigation. Whilst case law relating to CPR 3.9 relief from sanctions was relevant, the 'Denton' 3-stage test was not the correct one to be considered in this kind of application.

Webster v North East Lincolnshire Council [2015] 8 WLUK 310

In contrast with Moore, the Defendant's investigations which led to an admission that they later sought to withdraw were considered a "monumental failure". The Court determined that the Defendant was the "[author] of their own misfortune" in directing its considerations of conduct and prejudice.

Foster v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 573 (QB)

The Defendant made the application to withdraw just 3 weeks before trial and some 3 months after the new evidence relied on, an expert report, had become available.

The Claimant was unlikely to survive much longer, making an adjournment of the trial something that Mr Justice Foskett was not willing to contemplate.

Wood v Days Healthcare UK Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 2097

The Court of Appeal permitted the Defendant to withdraw an admission of liability largely based on new evidence coming to light in relation to quantum. The claim was initially presented as a Fast Track claim, indicating a value under £25,000, but was later presented with a value over £300,000. The Court found it "indisputable that highly material new evidence had come to light".

Financial Conduct Authority v Skinner & Others [2019] EWHC 392 (Ch)

The Court determined that the admissions the Defendant sought to withdraw could not actually provide a defence to an offence under ss.19 and 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

A focus on prospects of success is unlikely to be such a determinative factor in civil claims where both parties are likely to have evidence to support or defend a legitimate case.

What can we learn?

  • Applications are necessarily case specific but there are themes which have emerged in case law from the last few years which have offered useful guidance to defendants considering making such applications.
  • Judges faced with an application to withdraw an admission will consider each of the factors listed in PD 14 para 7.2 and give each of them due weight, thereby providing a wide margin of judicial discretion in making a decision on a case by case basis.
  • Defendants' investigations should be thorough and all evidence and documentation considered carefully before making an admission. The case law indicates that a court will be less sympathetic to an application based on a mistaken admission or following inadequate investigations by a defendant.
  • New evidence is not a prerequisite for success in an application to withdraw but will likely make it more persuasive. Consideration is given to whether applications to withdraw are to remedy errors or are tactical.
  • The presentation of a claim value significantly higher than previously indicated can be 'new evidence' but a defendant should be mindful of whether a significant claim was in fact indicated before the admission (even if the defendant was not persuaded then that the value would be substantiated).
  • Considerations of the overriding objective, administration of justice, conduct and prejudice are to some extent overlapping and the Court can be influenced by a failure to react promptly to new evidence, the realisation of an error or the initiation of an application at a late stage in proceedings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions