UK: 2008 Antitrust Year In Review : Developments In The UK

Last Updated: 16 July 2009
Article by Stephen Kon, Dr. Gordon Christian and Anna Rampling

This article was originally published by the ABA Section Of International Law in the 2008 Antitrust Year in Review.

A. Legislative and Administrative Developments

In July 2008, the U.K. Office of Fair Trading (the "OFT") published its response to the European Commission's White Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC Antitrust Rules.1 The OFT welcomed the Commission's proposal to adopt final decisions by National Competition Authorities2 ("NCAs") or final judgments by review courts3 on Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty as irrebuttable proof of infringement in subsequent civil antitrust damages cases relating to the same parties. The OFT considers that providing for such a binding effect is important for providing parties with increased certainty, reducing litigation costs and reducing burdens on the claimant.

The OFT also published for public consultation a draft version of its revised and expanded guidance on the OFT's merger control jurisdiction and procedure under the Enterprise Act 2002 (the "Enterprise Act").4 The consultation on the draft guidance was open until June 20, 2008. The OFT has now published a summary of the responses received, which in broad terms welcome the OFT's clarifications and suggestions.5

B. Mergers

In September 2008, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the "CAT") published its judgment on the joint appeals by BSkyB and Virgin against the Competition Commission's report, and the subsequent final decision of the Secretary of State, on BSkyB's acquisition of a 17.9% shareholding in ITV plc.6 The CAT dismissed BSkyB's appeal, holding that the Competition Commission was entitled to conclude that: (i) the acquisition created a relevant merger situation; and (ii) this gave rise to a substantial lessening of competition. The CAT found that the Competition Commission was entitled to conclude that BSkyB had acquired a material influence over ITV's business and strategic policies despite only having a 17.9% shareholding. The CAT also upheld the Competition Commission's order that BSkyB partially divest its shareholding in ITV to a level below 7.5%.

In response to Virgin's appeal, the CAT did find that the Competition Commission had incorrectly interpreted the Enterprise Act in relation to the public interest consideration, namely the effect of the merger on media plurality. The CAT held that the Competition Commission was not entitled to take into account the extent of the influence acquired by BSkyB and the internal editorial independence of the parties post-merger in its assessment. The Competition Commission's conclusion that the merger would have no adverse effect on media plurality was therefore set aside and the issue has been sent back to the Competition Commission for reconsideration. The CAT's judgment does not indicate whether further divestiture will be necessary in light of the Competition Commission's reassessment.

In April 2008, the Competition Commission and the OFT announced that they intend to work together on reviewing their respective guidelines for the substantive assessment of mergers with a view to publishing a single set of guidelines.7 The joint review will cover the guidance contained in Merger references: Competition Commission Guidelines (April 2003) with the OFT's Mergers: substantive assessment guidance (first issued in May 2003 and revised in 2004 and 2007). It has been five years since the Enterprise Act brought a new merger control regime into force. Competition Commission Chairman Peter Freeman commented, upon launching the review, that five years' experience of working under the current regulations leaves the two organizations well placed to provide joint guidance.8 Mr. Freeman also asserted that "joint guidelines will provide clarity for merger parties and promote consistency of approach". The Competition Commission and the OFT plan to publish the draft of their joint substantive merger guidelines for public consultation in March 2009.

In October 2007, the Secretary of State gave regulatory clearance to the acquisition of HBOS plc by Lloyds TSB Group plc.9 A new category of "financial stability" was added to the Enterprise Act 2002 recently (in addition to existing public interest intervention provisions) and, on that basis, the merger was called in for review by the Secretary of State.10 The OFT considered that the proposed acquisition could potentially result in a substantial lessening of competition in relation to personal current accounts, banking services for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and mortgages, thereby meriting an in-depth investigation by the Competition Commission.11 However, the Secretary of State was satisfied that, on balance, the public interest was best served by allowing the merger to proceed without such a reference. That said, the Secretary of State did request that the OFT should "continue to keep the relevant markets under review in order to protect the interests of UK consumers and the British economy".12 A legal challenge to this decision in the CAT was dealt with very expeditiously and dismissed.13

C. Cartels

In June 2008, custodial sentences were imposed on three UK businessmen found guilty of cartel conduct under the Enterprise Act affecting the global marine hose market.14 These are the first prosecutions that have been brought in the UK under the criminal "cartel offence" provisions of the Enterprise Act since the legislation came into force on June 20, 2003. The Court imposed sentences of between two-and-a-half and three years on each businessman. In addition, all three individuals were disqualified from serving as company directors for between five and seven years under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, and are subject to confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

In line with the OFT's stated intention to bring criminal prosecutions against individuals for cartel activity where appropriate, it announced in August 2008 that four past and present British Airways executives have been charged with cartel offences under the Enterprise Act.15 The four executives have been charged with dishonestly agreeing with others "to make or implement arrangements which directly or indirectly fix the price for the supply in the United Kingdom of passenger air transport services by British Airways and Virgin Atlantic Airways". If found guilty, the executives could face a term of imprisonment of up to five years and/or an unlimited fine. They may also be subject to company director disqualification orders under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 and confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

The OFT also concluded early resolution agreements with six companies under investigation for unlawful practices in relation to fixing the retail prices of tobacco products in the UK, leading to total fines of £132.3 million (approximately US$192 million).16 The use of this early resolution procedure is still a relatively novel one for the OFT, having been applied in only three OFT investigations to date, but it is likely to become more commonplace in the future.

The first ever representative action brought on behalf of consumers was settled in January 2008, entitling purchasers of the uniforms during the relevant period to a sum of between £5 and £20 action was for damages suffered as the result of an agreement to fix the price of certain replica football uniforms during the period 2000 to 2001.17 Despite the claim being settled in the early stages of proceedings, it nevertheless represented an important step in the recognition of the potential for the development of collective actions.

In April 2008, purchasers of electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products were refused permission to bring a follow-on action for damages in the CAT against the members of the cartel relating to carbon and graphite products.18 Under section 47A of the Competition Act 1998, a person who has suffered loss or damage by virtue of an infringement of EC or UK competition law has the right to bring a follow-on damages action in the CAT.19 However, CAT rules require its permission in cases where the decision upon which the claimant seeks to rely is still subject to appeal. In this instance, the appeals brought by certain members of the carbon and graphite product cartel against the European Commission's decision are still ongoing.20 Whilst each case is assessed on an individual basis, in this instance the CAT decided that it would not grant permission for an action to commence until the proceedings before the European courts had concluded.

Grampian Food Group and others (the "Purchasers") sought the CAT's permission in 2008 to bring an action for damages against the members of the Vitamins cartel.21 In 2001, the European Commission found that F. Hoffman-La-Roche AG, Sanofi-Aventis SA, BASF SE and others had illegally participated in a cartel involving pricefixing and sales quotas relating to vitamin products in breach of Article 81 of the EC Treaty.22 The Purchasers contend that they paid higher prices than they otherwise would have done for the duration of the cartel and suffered economic loss and damage as a result.

In April 2008, the OFT sent a Statement of Objections to 112 construction companies regarding their alleged involvement in bid rigging arrangements which are deemed to have led to higher prices for construction services across large parts of England.23 In the same month, the UK energy regulator, OFGEM, launched an investigation into two of the UK's biggest energy companies concerning alleged abuses of their dominant market position in Scotland.24

Finally, in August 2008, the Competition Commission published its provisional findings in the BAA airports market investigation, in which it provisionally concluded that BAA's common ownership of seven UK airports created a restriction on competition, with adverse consequences for both passengers and airlines.25 The Competition Commission then consulted with BAA on remedies, which included a proposal to require BAA to divest two of its three London airports and also either Edinburgh or Glasgow airport. In September 2008, BAA announced its decision to sell Gatwick airport.26 In response, the Competition Commission stated that it would take into account any action by BAA which may impact on the competition problems that the Competition Commission has identified.27 The Competition Commission published its provisional decision on remedies in December 2008, confirming that, subject to final consultation, it will require BAA to sell both Gatwick and Stansted airports, as well as Edinburgh airport.28 If implemented, this will be the first time that a market investigation reference has led to a structural rather than a behavioral remedy. The Competition Commission is expected to publish its final report by March 2009.

D. Anticompetitive Practices

The Competition Commission published its final report on the supply of groceries in the UK on April 30, 2008.29 Whilst the OFT acknowledged that "in many important respects, competition in the UK groceries industry is effective and delivers good outcomes for consumers", it also identified several problems related to the strong market positions held by large grocery retailers: (i) the use of restrictive covenants and/or exclusivity arrangements to prevent entry by competitors; and (ii) the ability to transfer excessive risk and unexpected costs to their suppliers. The supermarkets concerned are now in lengthy consultation with the Competition Commission over the remedies that it has proposed to address these issues.


1 Office of Fair Trading, Response to the European Commission's White Paper, Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (July 2008), available at .

2 A decision which has been accepted by the addressees (by virtue of their having refrained from appealing the decision) or which has been upheld upon appeal. See id.

3 A judgment by a court competent to review the decisions of an EU National Competition Authority under the laws of that authority's Member State. See id.

4 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT consults on revised guidance on merger jurisdiction and procedure (March 28, 2008), available at

5 Office of Fair Trading, Mergers - jurisdictional and procedural guidance: Summary of responses to draft guidance consultation document and emerging thinking (September 2008), available at .

6 British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Virgin Media, Inc. v. (1) The Competition Commission and (2) The Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform [2008] CAT 25 1095/4/8/08 and 1096/4/8/08 (U.K.), available at .

7 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT and Competition Commission launch review to issue joint merger guidelines (April 22, 2008), available at .

8 See id.

9 See Press Release, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (National), Peter Mandelson gives regulatory clearance to Lloyds TSB merger with HBOS (October 31, 2008), available at .

10 See Statutory Instruments 2008 No. 2645, Competition, The Enterprise Act 2002 (Specification of Additional .

11 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT report to the Secretary of State on Lloyds/HBOS merger (October 31, 2008), available at .

12 See Press Release, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (National), Peter Mandelson gives regulatory clearance to Lloyds TSB merger with HBOS (October 31, 2008), available at .

13 Merger Action Group (1) v. Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (2) supported by HBOS plc and Lloyds TSB Group plc (as Interveners) [2008] CAT 36, Case No. 1107/4/10/08 available at .

14 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, Three imprisoned in first OFT criminal prosecution for bid rigging (June 11, 2008), available at .

15 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT announces criminal charges in airline fuel surcharges cartel case (August 7, 2008), available at .

16 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT reaches early resolution agreements in tobacco case (July 11, 2008), available at .

17 See Press Release, JJB to make payments to consumers for replica football shirts (January 9, 2008), available at .

18 Emerson Electric v. Morgan Crucible, [2008] CAT 8 1077/5/7/07 (U.K.), available at . In December 2003, the European Commission found six members of a carbon and graphite products cartel in breach of Article 81 of the EC Treaty for price-fixing and market sharing, and imposed total fines of EUR 101.44 million (approximately US$147 million) on five of the cartel members. 2004/420 EC: Commission Decision of December 3, 2003 (Case No C.38.359 - Electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products), Official Journal L 125, 28/04/2004 P. 0045 - 0049.

19 See the Competition Act 1998, s. 47A 'Montetary claims before Tribunal'.

20 Cases T-68/04 (SGL Carbon v. Commission), T-69/04 (Schunk and Schunk Kohlenstoff-Technik v. Commission) and T-73/04 (Carbone Lorraine v. Commission), Official Journal C 106, 30/04/2004 P. 0071-0072.

21 Notice of a Claim for Damages under section 47A of the Competition Act 1998 Grampian Country Food Group Limited and others v. Sanofi-Aventis SA and others, (2008) 1101/5/7/08 (U.K.), available at .

22 2003/2/EC: Commission Decision of 21 November 2001 (Case COMP/E-1/37.512 - Vitamins), Official Journal L 006, 10/01/2003 P. 0001 - 0089.

23 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT issues statement of objections against 112 construction companies (April 17, 2008), available at .

24 See Information Note, OFGEM, OFGEM launches Competition Act investigation into Scottish Power Limited and Scottish and Southern Energy plc (April 8, 2008), available at .


26 See Press Release, BAA, BAA to sell Gatwick Airport (September 17, 2008), available at

27 Competition Commission, Statement from Competition Commission on BAA plans to sell Gatwick Airport (September 17, 2008), available at .

28 Competition Commission, News Release, BAA MARKET INVESTIGATION, Provisional decisions on sale of three airports and other remedies to competition problems (December 17, 2008), available at .


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.