UK: Comparative Advertising And Look-Alikes - The Smell Of Success For Brand Owners?

Following our previous briefings on comparative advertising, the Advocate General (whose opinion is non-binding but intended as guidance for the European Court of Justice) has recently thrown a much needed lifeline to brand owners following his decision in the 'smell-alike and look-alike' perfume case of L'Oréal v Bellure.

What Is All The Fuss About Comparative Advertising?

The crux of the issue is whether a brand owner can use its registered trade mark to stop its competitor(s) making (unfavourable) comparisons between its goods or services and those of the advertiser. The decision of European Court of Justice (ECJ) last year in O2 v 3G held that there had to be confusion in order for a brand owner to have an actionable claim for trade mark infringement. Absent confusion, the law of trade marks did not apply to comparative advertisements. The effect of the ECJ's ruling when taken together with the Court of Appeal's earlier comments meant trade mark infringement actions for comparative advertising were dead in the water. Brand owners would have to look to the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive instead, which provides a far less rigorous mechanism of enforcement and redress.

In the recent case of L'Oréal v Bellure, questions concerning the interpretation of the Trade Marks Directive and the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive were referred to the European Court of Justice. These questions related to the use by an advertiser of a brand owner's trade mark to identify goods which are those of the brand owner rather than the advertiser.

The Advocate General's opinion in L'Oréal v Bellure has given a boost to brand owners as it has opened the door to a trade mark infringement claim for comparative advertising in respect of those trade marks that enjoy a particular reputation.

The Background To The Dispute

L'Oréal is the owner of various trade marks relating to luxury perfumes, including the words Tresor, Miracle, Anaïs-Anaïs and Noa Noa together with the design of the Tresor perfume bottle and Miracle perfume box.

Bellure marketed and sold cheap perfumes throughout Europe that imitated the visual appearance of L'Oréal perfumes, including Tresor, Miracle, Anaïs-Anaïs and Noa Noa, but were sold at a fraction of the cost of L'Oreal's perfumes (often less than £4). In particular, Bellure made use of comparison lists that it supplied to retailers comparing its perfumes which "smelt like" the corresponding L'Oréal perfume. Furthermore, several perfumes marketed by Bellure were sold in bottles and boxes that were similar to the packaging and shape of L'Oreal's Tresor, Miracle, Anaïs-Anaïs and Noa perfumes.

The parties' products were not in direct competition with each other as they were in different price and market sectors. However, it was acknowledged in the proceedings that there was a competitive relationship at an intermediate level in the distribution chain (for example with wholesalers).

The Decision Of The UK Courts

L'Oréal issued trade mark infringement proceedings in the UK. L'Oréal claimed that Bellure had made use of an identical trade mark in respect of L'Oreal's perfume names that appeared on Bellure's comparison lists. L'Oréal also claimed that, by virtue of Bellure's imitation of the names, bottles and boxes of L'Oréal's perfumes, Bellure had taken unfair advantage of L'Oréal's various trade marks.

The High Court held that Bellure had infringed L'Oréal's trade marks in respect of the perfume names that appeared on its comparison lists and that there had also been trade mark infringement in respect Bellure's look-a-like products that imitated L'Oréal's registrations for the design of its Tresor box and the appearance of its Miracle bottle.

Bellure appealed. When the case came before the Court of Appeal, the Court sought clarification from the ECJ on a number of issues. The questions posed by the Court of Appeal are summarised below together with the Advocate General's responses.

The Opinion Of The Advocate General

In an Opinion that is in places confusing, the Advocate General has ruled (amongst other things) that, for those trade marks that have particular reputation, if a third party cannot show 'due cause' for using another person's registered trade mark, then it is taking unfair advantage of that mark and the trade mark owner can stop the use of its trade mark.

The decision is of application to all trade mark owners, as it goes to the heart of whether a brand owner can prevent another person 'free-riding' off its mark, even if the brand owner suffers no loss from the use of its mark.

The questions referred by the UK Court of Appeal and the Advocate General's responses are as follows.

1. In relation to the use of identical/similar marks for identical/similar goods and services, can there be trade mark infringement if there is no confusion caused by the comparative advertisement or if the essential function of the trade mark is unaffected?

The short answer was "no". The Advocate General said that there could only be infringement of an identical mark for identical goods and services where the use of the offending mark affected or was liable to affect the trade mark's essential function as a guarantee of origin, or any of the mark's other functions. Unfortunately, the Advocate General did not say what these other functions might be.

The Advocate General went on to say that there would be no infringement even if the use of the registered trade mark played a significant role in the promotion of the advertiser's goods, however, such use could be prevented under the Trade Marks Directive and the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive (see below).

2. Can there be unfair advantage (within the meaning of the Trade Mark Directive) where a trader uses a sign similar to a registered trade mark which has a reputation, and that sign is not confusingly similar to the trade mark, in such a way that:

  1. the essential function of the trade mark in guaranteeing origin is not impaired;
  2. there is no tarnishing or blurring of the registered trade mark or its reputation or any risk of either of these;
  3. the trade mark owner's sales are not impaired; and
  4. the trade mark owner is not deprived of any of the reward for promotion, maintenance or enhancement of his trade mark;
  5. but the trader gets a commercial advantage from the use of his sign by reason of its similarity to the registered mark

The short answer was "maybe". The notion of unfair advantage is set out in the Trade Marks Directive, which provides that a trade mark is infringed where an identical or similar mark is used for similar goods or services where "the use of that sign without due cause takes unfair advantage of ... the distinctive character or repute of the trade mark".

The Advocate General said the key to determining unfair advantage is ascertaining what benefit the advertiser has gained through using the brand owner's registered trade mark, rather than the harm caused to the well-known mark. In order for there to be an advantage, there must be some sort of 'boost' given to the advertiser by virtue of its use of the registered trade mark. However, it would still be necessary to determine whether the advantage was unfair.

The absence of any of the factors listed at (a) – (d) above would not prevent such a finding. Crucially, the Advocate General said that the use of a brand owner's trade mark could still be unfair even if it had no effect on sales or on the trade mark's essential function of guaranteeing origin if the advertiser could not establish 'due cause' in respect of its use of the trade mark. Unfortunately, the Advocate General did not provide any guidance or other clarity on what constituted 'due cause' but rather unsatisfactorily said this was a matter to be determined by the national courts.

3. Under the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive, what is the meaning of unfair advantage? Does the use of a trade mark in comparison lists constitute taking unfair advantage

The Advocate General recognised that any kind of advertisement making a comparison with a well-known product entailed a significant element of 'free-riding'. However, the use of a trade mark in a comparison list would not necessarily fall foul of the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive unless the comparison was unfair.

The concept of unfair advantage did not lend itself to a general definition but had to be applied in a flexible manner on a case by case basis and it was for the national courts to determine whether the advantage gained by the advertiser was unfair in light of the circumstances of the case.

4. Under the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive, what is meant by "presenting goods or services as imitations or replicas" and does this expression cover circumstances where, without causing any confusion or deception, a party truthfully says his product has a major characteristic like that of a well-known product which happens to be protected as a trade mark

The Advocate General said that the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive does not prohibit an advertiser saying that a product is equivalent to, or has the characteristics of a well known product. However, if the advertiser uses words such as 'type' or 'style' after the registered trade mark, then this is likely to fall foul of the Misleading and Comparative Advertising Directive.

What This Decision Means For Brand Owners

Assuming that the ECJ follows the Advocate General's opinion (which is not always the case), a brand owner can still bring a claim for trade mark infringement in respect of comparative advertising if the advert causes confusion or affects the essential function of the trade mark as a guarantee of origin. However, in practice this will be unlikely given the context of most comparative advertisements.

The door has, however, been left firmly open for trade mark infringement claims in respect of those trade mark owners who can establish that their trade marks enjoy a particular reputation and the advertisers use of its mark is unfair, even if no loss has been suffered. If the advertiser cannot show that it has 'due cause' for using the trade mark then a prima facie case is established. Of course, crucial to this is what is meant by 'due cause' and how this will be interpreted by the ECJ and the national courts.

The ECJ's decision is expected later this year so please watch out for future commentaries as to how this area of law continues to develop.

www.lg-legal.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.