UK: ABA Antitrust Year-in-Review 2008

Last Updated: 15 April 2009
Article by Stephen Kon, Dr. Gordon Christian and Anna Rampling

A. Legislative and Administrative Developments

In July 2008, the U.K. Office of Fair Trading (the "OFT") published its response to the European Commission's White Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC Antitrust Rules.1 The OFT welcomed the Commission's proposal to adopt final decisions by National Competition Authorities2 ("NCAs") or final judgments by review courts3 on Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty as irrebuttable proof of infringement in subsequent civil antitrust damages cases relating to the same parties. The OFT considers that providing for such a binding effect is important for providing parties with increased certainty, reducing litigation costs and reducing burdens on the claimant.

The OFT also published for public consultation a draft version of its revised and expanded guidance on the OFT's merger control jurisdiction and procedure under the Enterprise Act 2002 (the "Enterprise Act").4 The consultation on the draft guidance was open until June 20, 2008. The OFT has now published a summary of the responses received, which in broad terms welcome the OFT's clarifications and suggestions.5

B. Mergers

In September 2008, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the "CAT") published its judgment on the joint appeals by BSkyB and Virgin against the Competition Commission's report, and the subsequent final decision of the Secretary of State, on BSkyB's acquisition of a 17.9% shareholding in ITV plc.6 The CAT dismissed BSkyB's appeal, holding that the Competition Commission was entitled to conclude that: (i) the acquisition created a relevant merger situation; and (ii) this gave rise to a substantial lessening of competition. The CAT found that the Competition Commission was entitled to conclude that BSkyB had acquired a material influence over ITV's business and strategic policies despite only having a 17.9% shareholding. The CAT also upheld the Competition Commission's order that BSkyB partially divest its shareholding in ITV to a level below 7.5%.

In response to Virgin's appeal, the CAT did find that the Competition Commission had incorrectly interpreted the Enterprise Act in relation to the public interest consideration, namely the effect of the merger on media plurality. The CAT held that the Competition Commission was not entitled to take into account the extent of the influence acquired by BSkyB and the internal editorial independence of the parties post-merger in its assessment. The Competition Commission's conclusion that the merger would have no adverse effect on media plurality was therefore set aside and the issue has been sent back to the Competition Commission for reconsideration. The CAT's judgment does not indicate whether further divestiture will be necessary in light of the Competition Commission's reassessment.

In April 2008, the Competition Commission and the OFT announced that they intend to work together on reviewing their respective guidelines for the substantive assessment of mergers with a view to publishing a single set of guidelines.7 The joint review will cover the guidance contained in Merger references: Competition Commission Guidelines (April 2003) with the OFT's Mergers: substantive assessment guidance (first issued in May 2003 and revised in 2004 and 2007). It has been five years since the Enterprise Act brought a new merger control regime into force. Competition Commission Chairman Peter Freeman commented, upon launching the review, that five years' experience of working under the current regulations leaves the two organizations well placed to provide joint guidance.8 Mr. Freeman also asserted that "joint guidelines will provide clarity for merger parties and promote consistency of approach". The Competition Commission and the OFT plan to publish the draft of their joint substantive merger guidelines for public consultation in March 2009.

In October 2007, the Secretary of State gave regulatory clearance to the acquisition of HBOS plc by Lloyds TSB Group plc.9 A new category of "financial stability" was added to the Enterprise Act 2002 recently (in addition to existing public interest intervention provisions) and, on that basis, the merger was called in for review by the Secretary of State.10 The OFT considered that the proposed acquisition could potentially result in a substantial lessening of competition in relation to personal current accounts, banking services for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and mortgages, thereby meriting an in-depth investigation by the Competition Commission.11 However, the Secretary of State was satisfied that, on balance, the public interest was best served by allowing the merger to proceed without such a reference. That said, the Secretary of State did request that the OFT should "continue to keep the relevant markets under review in order to protect the interests of UK consumers and the British economy".12 A legal challenge to this decision in the CAT was dealt with very expeditiously and dismissed.13

C. Cartels

In June 2008, custodial sentences were imposed on three UK businessmen found guilty of cartel conduct under the Enterprise Act affecting the global marine hose market.14 These are the first prosecutions that have been brought in the UK under the criminal "cartel offence" provisions of the Enterprise Act since the legislation came into force on June 20, 2003. The Court imposed sentences of between two-and-a-half and three years on each businessman. In addition, all three individuals were disqualified from serving as company directors for between five and seven years under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, and are subject to confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

In line with the OFT's stated intention to bring criminal prosecutions against individuals for cartel activity where appropriate, it announced in August 2008 that four past and present British Airways executives have been charged with cartel offences under the Enterprise Act.15 The four executives have been charged with dishonestly agreeing with others "to make or implement arrangements which directly or indirectly fix the price for the supply in the United Kingdom of passenger air transport services by British Airways and Virgin Atlantic Airways". If found guilty, the executives could face a term of imprisonment of up to five years and/or an unlimited fine. They may also be subject to company director disqualification orders under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 and confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

The OFT also concluded early resolution agreements with six companies under investigation for unlawful practices in relation to fixing the retail prices of tobacco products in the UK, leading to total fines of £132.3 million (approximately US$192 million).16 The use of this early resolution procedure is still a relatively novel one for the OFT, having been applied in only three OFT investigations to date, but it is likely to become more commonplace in the future.

The first ever representative action brought on behalf of consumers was settled in January 2008, entitling purchasers of the uniforms during the relevant period to a sum of between £5 and £20 (equivalent to between US$7 and US$29). The action was for damages suffered as the result of an agreement to fix the price of certain replica football uniforms during the period 2000 to 2001.17 Despite the claim being settled in the early stages of proceedings, it nevertheless represented an important step in the recognition of the potential for the development of collective actions.

In April 2008, purchasers of electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products were refused permission to bring a follow-on action for damages in the CAT against the members of the cartel relating to carbon and graphite products.18 Under section 47A of the Competition Act 1998, a person who has suffered loss or damage by virtue of an infringement of EC or UK competition law has the right to bring a follow-on damages action in the CAT.19 However, CAT rules require its permission in cases where the decision upon which the claimant seeks to rely is still subject to appeal. In this instance, the appeals brought by certain members of the carbon and graphite product cartel against the European Commission's decision are still ongoing.20 Whilst each case is assessed on an individual basis, in this instance the CAT decided that it would not grant permission for an action to commence until the proceedings before the European courts had concluded.

Grampian Food Group and others (the "Purchasers") sought the CAT's permission in 2008 to bring an action for damages against the members of the Vitamins cartel.21 In 2001, the European Commission found that F. Hoffman-La-Roche AG, Sanofi-Aventis SA, BASF SE and others had illegally participated in a cartel involving pricefixing and sales quotas relating to vitamin products in breach of Article 81 of the EC Treaty.22 The Purchasers contend that they paid higher prices than they otherwise would have done for the duration of the cartel and suffered economic loss and damage as a result.

In April 2008, the OFT sent a Statement of Objections to 112 construction companies regarding their alleged involvement in bid rigging arrangements which are deemed to have led to higher prices for construction services across large parts of England.23 In the same month, the UK energy regulator, OFGEM, launched an investigation into two of the UK's biggest energy companies concerning alleged abuses of their dominant market position in Scotland.24

Finally, in August 2008, the Competition Commission published its provisional findings in the BAA airports market investigation, in which it provisionally concluded that BAA's common ownership of seven UK airports created a restriction on competition, with adverse consequences for both passengers and airlines.25 The Competition Commission then consulted with BAA on remedies, which included a proposal to require BAA to divest two of its three London airports and also either Edinburgh or Glasgow airport. In September 2008, BAA announced its decision to sell Gatwick airport.26 In response, the Competition Commission stated that it would take into account any action by BAA which may impact on the competition problems that the Competition Commission has identified.27 The Competition Commission published its provisional decision on remedies in December 2008, confirming that, subject to final consultation, it will require BAA to sell both Gatwick and Stansted airports, as well as Edinburgh airport.28 If implemented, this will be the first time that a market investigation reference has led to a structural rather than a behavioral remedy. The Competition Commission is expected to publish its final report by March 2009.

D. Anticompetitive Practices

The Competition Commission published its final report on the supply of groceries in the UK on April 30, 2008.29 Whilst the OFT acknowledged that "in many important respects, competition in the UK groceries industry is effective and delivers good outcomes for consumers", it also identified several problems related to the strong market positions held by large grocery retailers: (i) the use of restrictive covenants and/or exclusivity arrangements to prevent entry by competitors; and (ii) the ability to transfer excessive risk and unexpected costs to their suppliers. The supermarkets concerned are now in lengthy consultation with the Competition Commission over the remedies that it has proposed to address these issues.


1 Office of Fair Trading, Response to the European Commission's White Paper, Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (July 2008), available at mages/white_paper_comments/oft_en.pdf.

2 A decision which has been accepted by the addressees (by virtue of their having refrained from appealing the decision) or which has been upheld upon appeal. See id.

3 A judgment by a court competent to review the decisions of an EU National Competition Authority under the laws of that authority's Member State. See id.

4 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT consults on revised guidance on merger jurisdiction and procedure (March 28, 2008), available at

5 Office of Fair Trading, Mergers - jurisdictional and procedural guidance: Summary of responses to draft guidance consultation document and emerging thinking (September 2008), available at prise_act/oft1021.pdf.

6 British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Virgin Media, Inc. v. (1) The Competition Commission and (2) The Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform [2008] CAT 25 1095/4/8/08 and 1096/4/8/08 (U.K.), available at 095_Virgin_Inc_1096_290908.pdf.

7 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT and Competition Commission launch review to issue joint merger guidelines (April 22, 2008), available at .

8 See id.

9 See Press Release, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (National), Peter Mandelson gives regulatory clearance to Lloyds TSB merger with HBOS (October 31, 2008), available at ID=382908&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartme nt=True.

10 See Statutory Instruments 2008 No. 2645, Competition, The Enterprise Act 2002 (Specification of Additional

11 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT report to the Secretary of State on Lloyds/HBOS merger (October 31, 2008), available at ase/Mergers_home/LloydsTSB.

12 See Press Release, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (National), Peter Mandelson gives regulatory clearance to Lloyds TSB merger with HBOS (October 31, 2008), available at ID=382908&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartme nt=True.

13 Merger Action Group (1) v. Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (2) supported by HBOS plc and Lloyds TSB Group plc (as Interveners) [2008] CAT 36, Case No. 1107/4/10/08 available at 1208.pdf.

14 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, Three imprisoned in first OFT criminal prosecution for bid rigging (June 11, 2008), available at .

15 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT announces criminal charges in airline fuel surcharges cartel case (August 7, 2008), available at

16 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT reaches early resolution agreements in tobacco case (July 11, 2008), available at .

17 See Press Release, JJB to make payments to consumers for replica football shirts (January 9, 2008), available at football-shirt-rip-off-128985.jsp.

18 Emerson Electric v. Morgan Crucible, [2008] CAT 8 1077/5/7/07 (U.K.), available at n280408.pdf. In December 2003, the European Commission found six members of a carbon and graphite products cartel in breach of Article 81 of the EC Treaty for price-fixing and market sharing, and imposed total fines of EUR 101.44 million (approximately US$147 million) on five of the cartel members. 2004/420 EC: Commission Decision of December 3, 2003 (Case No C.38.359 - Electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products), Official Journal L 125, 28/04/2004 P. 0045 - 0049.

19 See the Competition Act 1998, s. 47A 'Montetary claims before Tribunal'.

20 Cases T-68/04 (SGL Carbon v. Commission), T-69/04 (Schunk and Schunk Kohlenstoff-Technik v. Commission) and T-73/04 (Carbone Lorraine v. Commission), Official Journal C 106, 30/04/2004 P. 0071-0072.

21 Notice of a Claim for Damages under section 47A of the Competition Act 1998 Grampian Country Food Group Limited and others v. Sanofi-Aventis SA and others, (2008) 1101/5/7/08 (U.K.), available at mpian_02.07.08.pdf.

22 2003/2/EC: Commission Decision of 21 November 2001 (Case COMP/E-1/37.512 - Vitamins), Official Journal L 006, 10/01/2003 P. 0001 - 0089.

23 See Press Release, Office of Fair Trading, OFT issues statement of objections against 112 construction companies (April 17, 2008), available at

24 See Information Note, OFGEM, OFGEM launches Competition Act investigation into Scottish Power Limited and Scottish and Southern Energy plc (April 8, 2008), available at Ofgem%2012.pdf.

25 COMPETITION COMMISSION, BAA AIRPORTS MARKET INVESTIGATION: PROVISIONAL FINDINGS REPORT (August 20, 2008), available at http://www.competitioncommission. _findings.htm.

26 See Press Release, BAA, BAA to sell Gatwick Airport (September 17, 2008), available at s+Releases/cd315e60c2b6c110VgnVCM10000036821c0 a____/a22889d8759a0010VgnVCM200000357e120a___ _/.

27 Competition Commission, Statement from Competition Commission on BAA plans to sell Gatwick Airport (September 17, 2008), available at http://www.competitioncommission. ent_17_sept.pdf.

28 Competition Commission, News Release, BAA MARKET INVESTIGATION, Provisional decisions on sale of three airports and other remedies to competition problems (December 17, 2008), available at http://www.competitioncommission.

29 COMPETITION COMMISSION, MARKET INVESTIGATION INTO THE SUPPLY OF GROCERIES IN THE UK (April 30, 2008), available at rep_pub/reports/2008/538grocery.htm.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions