UK: Making Sense Of Kidsons: - The Problem With Notification

Last Updated: 31 March 2009
Article by Rosalind Jones

Insurance disputes which turn solely on the question of notification do not come along very often. This is one reason why the litigation between chartered accountants, HLB Kidsons, and their professional indemnity insurers, has attracted so much attention. In court, Kidsons was required to argue the toss with its professional indemnity insurers as to whether it had effectively notified insurers of circumstances concerning flawed tax avoidance schemes marketed to its clients. All the claims which were ultimately brought against Kidsons were received after the expiry of the policy, and the policy was on a claims-made basis, so the issue was purely, in the words of the Judge, " a contest about notification".

The end result, as we now know, is that the Court at first instance held that a notification had been made to insurers, albeit not to the whole market, and only of limited circumstances; the Court of Appeal allowed that a wider range of circumstances had been notified, but otherwise left the Judgment at first instance broadly intact. However, Kidsons was a case decided on a particular policy wording and on its particular facts. Are there any general points of principle that can be take away from the decision?

Condition precedent

One point which has caused some debate is that the assured's obligation to notify circumstances to insurers "as soon as practicable" was construed by the Court as a condition precedent to insurers' liability. This was despite the fact that the requirement was not expressed to be a condition precedent. On the face of it, this seems inconsistent with themodern approach which requires conditions precedent to be expressed in clear language, given the draconian effect which non compliance can have for the policyholder. Moreover, the clause containing this provision directly followed a condition which was expressed to be a condition precedent. It would therefore be reasonable to assume that the words "condition precedent" had been deliberately omitted by the draftsman for a reason.

The clause in question said "The Assured shall give to the Underwriters notice in writing as soon as practicable of any circumstances of which they shall become aware during the period specified in the Schedule which may give rise to a loss or claim against them. Such notice having been given any loss or claim to which that circumstance has given rise which is subsequently made after the expiration of the period specified in the Schedule shall be deemed for the purpose of this Insurance to have been made during the subsistence hereof".

This meant, the Court decided, that if the assured became aware of circumstances during the policy period but failed to give notice to insurers "as soon as practicable", there would be no cover for the claim. In other words, proper notice was a condition precedent to liability.

To understand the Court's reasoning, however, it is important to appreciate firstly, that it was not in issue in the case that the policy allowed circumstances to be notified to underwriters after expiry of the policy – provided the assured was "aware" of circumstances during the currency of the policy. This may be surprising to those in the professional indemnity market who are perhaps more familiar with policies where notifications must be made within the policy period. However, against that background, the Court was not prepared to place a construction on the policy which permitted the assured to know about circumstances which might give rise to a loss but only disclose them to insurers at any time of his own choosing after expiry of the policy. The Court's view was that such a construction might rob the policy of its claims-made features. This was the logical stepping stone for the Court's conclusion that notice to insurers must be given "as soon as practicable" and as a condition precedent to insurers' liability.

It was also important to the Court's approach that the clause which provided cover in respect of notified circumstances operated by way of an extension of cover. Claims which arose after expiry of the policy were, prima facie, outside the scope of the insuring clause which provided an indemnity only in respect of claims made during the policy period. However, such claims would be covered under the extension provided they arose from circumstances of which the assured became aware during the policy period. The Court's reasoning was that the assured had no contractual right to an indemnity for post-policy period claims. Therefore, if an assured wished to have the valuable benefit of an extension of cover which otherwise would not exist, it was incumbent on the assured to give the requisite notice.

In short, commercial reasoning seems to have informed the Court's interpretation of the clause as a condition precedent, rather than a new judicial approach to the construction of these conditions.

"Laundry lists" and circumstances

Another issue which was the subject of debate in the case was what it actually means for an assured to be "aware" of circumstances which may give rise to a claim. This is a question which will be familiar to insureds considering whether or not to notify circumstances as their professional indemnity policy nears expiry. The Court of Appeal found this to be a two fold requirement - that the assured has an awareness of circumstances coupled with a degree of crystal ball gazing as to whether that circumstance will give rise to a claim. On that analysis, the Court suggested that where an insured tries to notify a circumstance which is too vague or remote to be reasonably capable of being regarded as a matter which might give rise to a claim, an insurer would be entitled to refuse to accept it as a notification. The term "laundry list" was not specifically used in this part of the Judgment, but the Court expressly had in mind notifications by the insured at the end of the policy period given in the widest possible terms for which there may be no real justification.

Kidsons' problems with its notification arose from rather unusual circumstances. Some of the letters which Kidsons sent to its insurers, and later sought to rely on as notifications, had been deliberately couched in a low key way so as not to cause ripples with insurers. In part, this was because Kidsons had concerns about their poor claims record and the prospect of higher premiums at renewal. In part, it was because there was some doubt as to whether there was any coverage at all for the activities of the Kidsons' vehicle which had marketed the tax avoidance schemes, and so the early communications from Kidsons were an attempt to test the water. Although these tactics did not reflect well on Kidsons, the Court of Appeal expressed doubts as to whether the subjective intentions of an assured had any relevance to the question of notification. However, the Court readily accepted that when an insured is notifying circumstances which may give rise to a claim under the policy, he must ensure that the notification is a fair, if summarised, presentation of what the insured knows. It was not argued out in Kidsons, but it is clear from the Judgment that an assured who chooses to be economical with the truth with his insurers runs the risk that the notification should be treated as invalid.

The following market

The Kidsons case also highlighted the position of the following market with respect to notifications. It is not unusual for there to be a delay in the presentation of claims by the broker to the following market and the expert evidence in Kidsons was to the effect that in practice the following market tends not to take any point on delays in notification. However, the following market is entitled to take the point if it so chooses, and it did so in the Kidsons' case, where the delay in notification by the broker to the following Lloyd's market was some three months. This, the Court found, was not notice given "as soon as practicable".


The Kidsons case provides an interesting case study of what can go wrong with notifications but it does not represent a new approach to the construction of conditions precedent. As far as notifications are concerned, the practical advice to assureds has not changed - if in doubt, notify. A notified circumstance which never gives rise to a claim will be forgotten about. On the other hand, a notified circumstance which does give rise to a claim will usually (and self evidently) justify having been notified. As far as insurers are concerned, the case illustrates that, while the courts will not readily deprive an assured of its cover, there are some circumstances which will warrant taking a notification point against the assured. The lesson for brokers is to observe the notification requirements in the policy when presenting claims to the following market, as well as to the lead, or otherwise ensure that an alternative arrangement for notifying the following market has been agreed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.