UK: Competition Appeal Tribunal Criticises Parts Of The Competition Commission´s Report On The UK Groceries Market

On 4 March 2009, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) published its judgment on an appeal by Tesco against the Competition Commission (CC) findings in its final report on the UK groceries market. The CAT concluded that the CC had failed to take account of relevant considerations when recommending the competition test be incorporated into the planning regime, and will now hear submissions on appropriate relief.

The CAT's judgment is focused on the narrow issues directly raised by the Tesco case. The CAT has declined to enunciate general principles, or to prescribe precisely how the CC should address the task of formulating remedies in a market investigation case. It has declined to answer some of the questions of statutory interpretation raised by Tesco in the formulation of its case.

But, whilst emphasising the narrow scope of judicial review, and the wide margin of appreciation available to the CC, the CAT's judgment is more likely to be remembered for its result – namely, that the CAT ultimately decided that the CC had not applied the proportionality test properly.


Tesco's appeal challenged the recommendation in the CC's report that a "competition test" should be incorporated into the planning regime as part of a package of remedies to address the adverse effect on competition the CC had found in its inquiry. The competition test would generally prevent local authorities from granting planning permission for the construction of a new large supermarket, or the extension of an existing supermarket, where the relevant local market for the supply of groceries was already highly concentrated in favour of, among others, the applicant or would become highly concentrated as a result of the grant of planning consent.

The competition test was designed to prevent additional local markets becoming highly concentrated. During the course of the CAT proceedings, it became apparent that the CC also saw the test as facilitating new market entry, on the basis that, if a large incumbent operator was unable to secure planning consent to build a new or extended store, that would enhance the prospects that others could secure planning consent for a rival store.

In its judgment the CAT concluded that the CC had failed to take account of certain relevant considerations in deciding to recommend that the competition test should be adopted, and those matters could not be dismissed as incapable of affecting that recommendation. However, the CAT reached no conclusion as to whether the CC could lawfully have adopted the competition test, if it had had due regard to these additional relevant considerations.

The parties will address the CAT as to specific relief to be granted at a separate hearing. Under the provisions of the relevant legislation the CAT may quash the whole or part of the decision in question and refer it back to the CC with a direction to reconsider and make a new decision in accordance with the CAT's ruling.

Key issues

Tesco argued that, in observing its obligations to act proportionately, the CC had failed properly to take into account the "economic costs" of the competition test (i.e. detriments to consumers which would arise where there was local demand for additional supermarket services, an incumbent supermarket's application for planning consent was refused by virtue of the competition test, and no alternative proposal was presented to meet the relevant demand.)

The CAT held that the CC's report did not properly address this potential detriment of the proposed competition test, but should have done so.

Tesco also argued that the CC had failed to consider how effective the competition test would be in addressing the adverse effects on competition which it had identified as arising from local market concentrations. In defending its report, the CC argued that the competition test had two aspects: it would prevent new concentrations from arising in local markets; and it would facilitate competitive market entry by third parties. This "facilitative" aspect of the proposed remedy was, according to the CC, an important element of its effectiveness.

The CAT held that, in the same way that the CC had failed properly to address the possibility that there would be cases where the competition test might block one new supermarket development, where there was no alternative development in prospect, the CC had likewise failed to assess how effective the competition test would be at facilitating, or ensuring, competitive market entry. The CC's report was deficient in this respect.

Whilst the CAT's judgment focuses, in many respects, on the particular issues raised by Tesco's appeal, the judgment also sets out some principles of wider application as to how the CC should carry out the proportionality exercise in the context of the statutory framework of a market investigation and the scope of the CAT's powers of review in relation to the test.

CAT's consideration of the principle of proportionality

Principles to be applied

The CAT identifies, in its judgment, the main aspects of the proportionality principles to be applied in assessing remedies to be imposed in the context of a market investigation, namely that "the measure: (1) must be effective to achieve the legitimate aim in question (appropriate), (2) must be no more onerous than is required to achieve that aim (necessary), (3) must be the least onerous, if there is a choice of equally effective measures and (4) in any event must not produce any adverse effects which are disproportionate to the aim pursued".

In the case under examination, the CC had failed to examine how effective the proposed competition test would be (compared with other possible remedies, such as store divestments) and what scale of adverse effects it might produce (issues (1) and (4)).

Margin of appreciation

The CAT specifically notes that the application of the principles is likely to give rise to many questions of judgment and appraisal and that this is particularly so when the CC is required to balance the aims of the proposed measure on one side and any adverse effects it may produce on the other. The CAT confirms that, in resolving these questions, the CC has a very wide margin of appreciation and makes it very clear that a Tribunal carrying out a judicial review process will not easily interfere with this.

The CAT goes on to make clear that the margin of appreciation to be exercised by the CC extends to the methodology that it decides to use to investigate and estimate the factors to be considered in any proportionality analysis (as well as in the determination of statutory questions of comprehensiveness, reasonableness and practicability). It notes that neither the relevant legislation nor the general law impose any requirements as to the formal procedure or methodology to be followed when it considers the effectiveness of a possible remedy or its relevant costs, adverse effects and benefits: ultimately the CC can "tailor its investigation of any specific factor to the circumstances of the case and follow such procedures as it considers appropriate". In particular, a methodology may be appropriate, even if it does not entail any precise quantification of the effects of a particular remedy.

"Double proportionality approach"

However, the CAT also states that, in tailoring its investigation of a specific factor to the circumstances of a case, it may well be "sensible" for the CC to "apply a double proportionality approach", so that the more important a particular factor is likely to be, or the more intrusive, uncertain or wide ranging a remedy is likely to be, then the more detailed the investigation of that factor may need to be.

The CAT states that the CC must "do what is necessary to put itself in a position properly to decide the statutory questions", including examining and taking into account relevant considerations such as the effectiveness of the remedy, the time period in which it will achieve its aim and the extent of any adverse effects that may flow from its implementation.

Assessment of proportionality in the groceries report

In this case, the CAT found the CC's assessment of proportionality to be flawed. In addition to the deficiency in relation to the consideration of welfare losses or "economic" costs which were also relevant to the assessment of proportionality, the CAT noted that:-

  • The CC did not attempt to estimate the competition test's contribution to the achievement of the aim of the test (in particular, the extent to which it would facilitate further entry), describe how or to what extent the remedy might be expected to achieve those aims or indicate the timescale over which the remedy might be expected to have effect;
  • The report did not include any of the specific considerations of the question of timescale or effectiveness generally which would be expected in a report as "detailed and painstaking" as the groceries report. The CAT considered this to be particularly significant given that the competition test would be capable of having widespread effects in the sector;
  • Whilst the CC had put in front of the CAT a number of arguments as to why it could not assess the effectiveness of the test or the timescale within which it could be expected to introduce more competition into concentrated markets, none of the CC's arguments appeared in the text of the report and had merely been produced in a "forensic" context.

"The assessments and the weighing must take place"

The CAT concluded that "Whilst the precise methodology adopted for assessing these matters, and the weight to be attributed to such assessments are (subject to rationality or questions of law) likely to fall within the margin of appreciation of the Commission, the assessments and the weighing must take place.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.