UK: Parental Responsibility

Last Updated: 12 November 2018
Article by Peter Hood

Do recent Court of Appeal decisions create a 'Catch 22'?

Since 2017, the Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in three landmark cases, which involve cases brought against English multinationals by victims of human rights impacts, related to the operations of their overseas subsidiaries.

The cases bring in to sharp focus the question of a parent company’s liability for the acts and omissions of its subsidiaries. This article considers what this means for English domiciled companies and how they manage human rights related risk throughout their operations.

Three cases

In Vedanta (Lungowe and Ors. v Vedanta PLC and Anor. [2017] EWCA Civ 1528), a group of Zambian farmers brought claims against Vedanta Resources PLC and its Zambian subsidiary in relation to environmental damage allegedly caused by pollution from mines in northern Zambia. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s decision to accept jurisdiction, rejecting Vedanta’s challenge and finding that there was a real issue to be tried against both parent and subsidiary.

In Shell (Okpabi and Ors. v Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Anor. [2018] EWCA Civ 191) and Unilever (AAA & Ors. v Unilever PLC and Tea Kenya Limited [2018] EWCA Civ 1532), the Court of Appeal reached a different conclusion, rejecting jurisdiction over claims brought by victims of alleged environmental damage in the Niger Delta and post-election violence in Kenya respectively. This was not due to some fundamental disagreement on the law. The Court assessed the cases within the same legal framework, albeit one which affords significant discretion to judges to determine whether or not a duty of care arises on a given set of facts.

The legal framework

Traditionally, English parent companies might have been insulated from liability in cases like Vedanta, Shell and Unilever. Strict adherence to the doctrine of separate legal personality prevented claimants affected by the acts or omissions of a subsidiary from bringing claims against its parent company. Further, an English court would not accept jurisdiction where England was ‘forum non-conveniens’ – that is, where it considered there to be another, more appropriate country in which the case should be heard.

However, the law has changed and so has the exposure of English parent companies (particularly those with overseas subsidiaries in weak governance zones). For some time, European law has required English courts to accept jurisdiction over an English company, irrespective of whether England is the appropriate forum. Vedanta is a case in point. The harm occurred in Zambia, the claims were brought pursuant to Zambian law and the claimants and most of the relevant witnesses were located in Zambia. However, because Vedanta PLC is domiciled in England, the English court considered itself bound to accept jurisdiction over it. Depending on the UK’s Brexit deal, this may not be the case forever. However, for the time being, the law on jurisdiction over an English parent company is clear – there is little, if any, scope for an English company to challenge the jurisdiction of an English court in which it is sued.

“The law creates a challenging landscape for governance professionals in which it can be difficult to chart a course that minimises legal, social and reputational risk”

Establishing jurisdiction over the foreign subsidiary is more complicated. The claimants must satisfy a number of tests set out in the Civil Procedure Rules, including by demonstrating that: England is the appropriate forum; that there is a real prospect of success against the subsidiary; and that there is real issue to be tried against the parent company. This means that the court is required to look into the substance of the claims at an interlocutory stage in order to establish whether it has jurisdiction to proceed to trial. It is in this context that the issue of parent company liability arose in the recent cases before the Court of Appeal.

What’s new?

The recent cases do not fundamentally change the law. In Shell, the Court was at pains to stress that there remains no special doctrine of parent company liability for persons affected by the acts of a subsidiary. Parent and subsidiary remain separate legal persons, each with responsibility for their own separate acts or omissions and a parent will only be subject to a duty of care if ordinary, general principles of tort law are satisfied in a given case. This requires that there is sufficient proximity, foreseeability and that it is fair just and reasonable to establish a duty. So far, so uncontroversial.

What is new, and has wide practical significance for governance professionals, is the range of circumstances in which the Court considered these ingredients to be satisfied so as to create a direct duty of care to persons affected by the operations of a subsidiary. Parent companies should now be alive to the possibility of direct liability in circumstance where they:

  • Assume responsibility for designing a material policy the adequacy of which is the subject of the claim, for example a group environmental, sustainability or human rights policy;
  • Control or take over the management of the activities which are the subject of the claim; or 
  • Provide advice to the subsidiary on how it should manage a particular risk.

In practice, this represents a significant expansion of the circumstances which will give rise to a parent company duty of care. Further, it is now clear that a duty may be owed to non-employees; and that it may arise with respect to both health and safety and other areas of risk. Where claimants can demonstrate that there is a ‘real issue’ to be tried with respect to the parent company, their chances of being able to anchor a case against parent and subsidiary in the English courts is vastly increased.

Lessons for governance professionals

The obvious takeaway for governance professionals is that English multinationals are exposed to an increased risk of legal liability arising out of the operations of their overseas subsidiaries. Attention should be paid not just to the risk posed to employees of a subsidiary but also to other community members affected by their operations. This is most apparent with respect to environmental damage but other risks (for example land rights, human rights risks associated with security for operations or the privacy rights of consumers) should also be considered.

There is a concern that these cases create a ‘Catch 22’ for English domiciled multinationals which has potentially undesirable policy consequences. The judgments make it clear that a duty of care will be more likely to arise where a parent company takes responsibility and seeks to intervene in the risk management and operations of its subsidiaries.

This cuts against the grain of ‘soft’ law such as the UN Guiding Principles and OECD Guidelines which encourage parent companies to do exactly that. Take the example of a parent company which seeks to fulfil its responsibility to respect human rights and honour commitments made in its Modern Slavery statement by adopting policies and carrying out due diligence on in its overseas subsidiaries and suppliers. By taking these steps, the business could be seen to assume responsibility for designing a material policy the adequacy of which is the subject of a claim, thereby increasing the likelihood of a duty of care arising and consequent legal action in the English courts.

The Shell judgment goes some way to addressing this Catch 22. The Court distinguished between a parent company which takes steps to ensure that there are proper controls in place by establishing an overall system of mandatory policies, processes and uniform practices on the one hand, and a parent company which actually seeks to exercise control on the other. Only in the latter case might a duty of care arise.

Further, a business may decide that the right thing to do as well as the best way to reduce legal liability and the public relations damage consequent on involvement in an adverse human rights impact is to identify the risk and take steps to prevent it arising in the first place, irrespective of whether this could create a duty of care. In any event, this due diligence work will often be most effective when it is carried out at a subsidiary level; where the personnel are more likely to understand the relevant context.

However, the wide discretion given to courts in determining whether a duty of care may arise and the contradictory, unsettled (all three cases are expected to go to the Supreme Court) nature of the law creates a challenging landscape for governance professionals in which it can be difficult to chart a course that minimises legal, social and reputational risk. Based on the recent cases, one such course might be for the parent to ensure that there is a robust system of mandatory policies, processes and practices in place which apply to all subsidiaries and suppliers while ensuring that the responsibility for implementing these policies lies at the subsidiary level. To enable this to happen, businesses may need to invest in building the capacity of subsidiary employees to identify and mitigate human rights risks as well as to deal with human rights impacts when they arise.

What is clear is that management of human rights risk is an issue with serious legal consequences. Wherever responsibility for human rights, sustainability and the environment lies in a business; it is important. to ensure a co-ordinated approach with the business’s lawyers and to work together to reduce the risk of adverse human rights impacts and associated legal risk.

Peter Hood is a consultant in the business and human rights practice at Hogan Lovells

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions