UK: Abuses Of Power

Last Updated: 8 November 2018
Article by Kirsty-Anne Jasper

The use of parliamentary privilege to break non-disclosure agreements raises questions about their usage

This month has had an unfortunate amount of light shone onto the role of non-disclosure agreements and their legaility and morality, or lack thereof. The main focus of this press attention has come from the naming in parliament of controversial businessman and chairman of Arcadia Group, Sir Philip Green, as the UK businessman who had been alleged to have used non-disclosure agreements and substantial payments to conceal the truth about serious and repeated sexual harassment, racist abuse and bullying.

This case is of course extremely troubling in many ways and much has and will be written on the subject. In terms of governance, we must look to the responsibilities of the board and auditors and also to the government and legal system.

In the case of Sir Philip, the Court of Appeal had granted him and his senior staff a temporary injunction against the Daily Telegraph, preventing them from publishing the results of an eight month investigation into allegations of bullying, intimidation and sexual harassment.

The Telegraph has reported that they had interviews with several members of Sir Philip’s staff who revealed that ‘substantial sums’ were paid to reported victims in return for legal commitments not to discuss their alleged experiences.

Non-disclosure agreements

Following days of press and social media speculation into the identity of the businessman, former cabinet minister and Leader of the House of Commons, Peter Hain revealed Sir Philip’s name in the House of Lords, stating: ‘Having been contacted by someone intimately involved in the case of a powerful businessman using non-disclosure agreements and substantial payments to conceal the truth about serious and repeated sexual harassment, racist abuse and bullying which is compulsively continuing I feel it’s my duty under parliamentary privilege to name Philip Green as the individual in question given that the media have been subject to an injunction preventing publication of the full details of this story which is clearly in the public interest.’

Sir Philip has refused to comment on court proceedings or anything that was said in parliament but did issue a statement denying any wrongdoing.‘To the extent that it is suggested that I have been guilty of unlawful sexual or racist behaviour, I categorically and wholly deny these allegations. […] Arcadia and I take accusations and grievances from employees very seriously and in the event that one is raised, it is thoroughly investigated’ he said.

‘Arcadia employs more than 20,000 people and in common with many large businesses sometimes receives formal complaints from employees. In some cases these are settled with the agreement of all parties and their legal advisers. These settlements are confidential so I cannot comment further on them.’

Privacy law

The decision to use parliamentary privilege in this way has not been without criticism, with the former Attorney General, Dominic Grieve describing Lord Hain’s actions to BBC Radio 4’s World at One ‘an entirely arrogant decision that had absolutely no regard for judicial process or the rule of law.’

These concerns have been raised before, in 2011 over the granting of so-called ‘superinjunctions’ and the naming of Ryan Giggs by the Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming as the footballer who had secured one in order to cover-up allegations of an affair.

The then lord chief justice, Lord Judge, observed: ‘It is, of course, wonderful for you if a Member of Parliament stands up in parliament and says something which in effect means an order of the court on anonymity is breached.

“What concerned me about this case was wealth, and power that comes with it, and abuse”

But you do need to think whether it’s a good idea for our lawmakers to be flouting a court order just because they disagree with a court order or they disagree with the privacy law created by parliament.’

The decision to reveal the allegations is complicated further by the fact that two of the five alleged victims, were opposed to the Daily Telegraph publishing the story and against Sir Philip’s naming.

This raises questions about the motivation behind this reveal and also about the rights of alleged victims if their wishes are contradictory to what is deemed by those in power to be in the public interest.

Responding to these criticisms Lord Hain told BBC’s Newsnight: ‘I considered it extremely seriously before I said it. I’m not disputing judges’ responsibilities or timing or anything like that. That’s a matter for the judiciary.

I’m discharging my function as a parliamentarian - and what concerned me about this case was wealth, and power that comes with it, and abuse.’Further questions about Lord Hain’s role in the case have been raised following the revelation that he has undisclosed financial ties to the law firm Gordon Dadds, who are the firm representing the Daily Telegraph.

Lord Hain is their global and government advisor but has ‘categorically’ denied that he was aware of their work with the newspaper.The law firm has stated that Lord Hain received now information from it regarding the case ‘including any information which would enable him to identify Philip Green as having any involvement in it.’

A familiar story

The abuse of power and the use of non-disclosure agreements is a sadly familiar story in the era of the #metoo movement.

What is new in this case is that the second highest-ranking court in the United Kingdom, upheld legally binding gagging agreements against the five Arcadia group employees. Effectively, the court had found that Sir Philip’s confidentiality was more important than the public’s right to know.

Of course, it is to be noted that confidentiality arrangements are standard practice when employment disputes are settled outside of court. They serve to prevent either party from disclosing terms of the settlement or making disparaging remarks about the other party.

The theory behind such arrangements is that both parties are equal and the agreement treats each the same. However, it is obviously not always the case, particularly when one party has the weight of wealth and influence behind them.

It is also obvious that despite the legal protections, which were noted by the Court of Appeal in the Green agreements, which protected the claimants’ rights of legitimate disclosure, including criminal offences, that signatories of these agreements may feel that their rights to whistle blow or speak to police are hindered for fear of being sued.

Peter Swabey, policy and research director at ICSA: The Governance Institute comments saying: ‘This is a difficult setting which pits contract law against public policy and perhaps even more against public sentiment (though sometimes there is a whiff of public prurience).

To what extent is it defensible to permit someone to buy another’s silence about an issue that may well be illegal? Or that someone should be able to take a payment for their silence and then talk to the press? And does it matter what the issue is or who is involved? Whether or not we like Philip Green shouldn’t be allowed to affect our answer to those questions.

It seems to me that, to the extent that the law allows the silencing of victims of potentially criminal conduct, the law should be changed. But I can’t help thinking that using the absolute defence of Parliamentary privilege to avoid a slander action and to frustrate ongoing legal proceedings and a court decision undermines the rule of law and is questionable in a case where Parliament itself has the ability to change the law.

That is even more so when, as in this case, the court order is an interim injunction intended to give time for these important issues to be properly considered by judges with access to all the facts. In this case Lord Hain seems to have appointed himself prosecutor, judge and jury and his reported but undisclosed links with one of the law firms engaged in the case are unhelpful and cloud the purported propriety of his actions.’

Kirsty-Anne Jasper is deputy editor of Governance and Compliance 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions