UK: Paul Stanton: 'If The NHS Perishes From Neglect, We Will Miss It More Than We Can Imagine'

Last Updated: 18 October 2018
Article by Henry Ker

We speak to the former director for NHS board development, then called the national clinical governance support team, and a senior strategy adviser in the department of health, about the state of health service governance

For the past decade, Professor Paul Stanton has been working with the boards of every kind of NHS organisation – from hospital trusts, community service providers and ambulance trusts, to clinical commissioning groups and mental health trusts. In total, he has worked with the boards of over 185 public sector organisations.

He speaks to Governance and Compliance about how the NHS has been sleepwalking into crisis, as an aging population risks crippling one of the cornerstones of the UK's welfare system, and about how legislation and a pre-occupation with a health 'market' has conspired to promote a muddled, fragmented and dysfunctional system of governance that is woefully unfit for purpose.

What do you make of the current state of governance in the health service?

Robust and transparent governance is vital to the survival and transformation of the NHS. However, the Health and Social Care Act 2012 – one of the most muddled and ill-considered acts of the Conservative/Liberal Democrats coalition government – is a major obstacle to effective governance and to the whole system reform that is necessary for the NHS to be fit for 21st century purpose.

It perpetuated health and social care separation and further fragmented the NHS by creating a proliferation of clinical commissioning groups (CCGs). They lacked critical mass in terms of the patient populations served and the capacity and capability of their executive and managerial infrastructures. This was compounded by the enigma that is CCG 'governance'.

The act created 'governing bodies' for each CCG – but they are in no sense unitary boards with determinate authority and responsibility. The act specifies that the functions and responsibilities of a governing body are defined and delegated to them by the GP member practices that make up a CCG. Practices, collectively, retain overall accountability for all of the CCGs actions. So, in a sense, the member practices govern the governing body.

As most CCGs are the contract holders for their own constituent GP providers, a CCG is, in effect, a conflict of interest given statutory organisational form.

So have the governance issues been ignored and marginalised?

I can understand why NHS England avoids confronting the muddle of CCG governance and why it tends to see NHS unitary provider trust boards as an obstacle to rationalisation and system reform. Too many provider boards misunderstand their duty.

They were beguiled by the old foundation trust mantra of growing their financial surplus and seeing their first duty as to promote the wellbeing of their own organisation. It is not. It is to promote the wellbeing of the owners of the NHS – and, as we know from the NHS constitution – the NHS belongs to all of us as citizens.

"Whenever there is a conflict between the needs of a trust itself and the overall needs of the health care system, it is the system that must take primacy"

And therefore, since, as John Carver said in his book 'Boards That Make A Difference', 'governance is ownership, one level down, not management one level up', the duty of an NHS board is to promote the interests of the population at large, and of local communities.

So whenever there is a conflict between the needs of a trust itself and the overall needs of the health care system, it is the system that must take primacy. Cicero provides the ethical touchstone for every NHS board: 'Let the good of the people be the highest law'.

At present, although individual trusts are governed, there is no statutory basis for the governance of the health and social care system.

Since there is no appetite in government to create a new legislative framework, governance is pragmatically ignored by the system's national leaders and performance regulators, NHS England and NHS Improvement. They view governance as grit rather than oil in the machine – slowing down urgent and much needed rationalisation and transformation.

As a result, the Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships that they established to drive the system reform agenda have pseudo-governance that is as ramshackle, opaque and unaccountable as that of CCGs.

To be fair to the national bodies, they and the system reform agenda are still bedeviled by the legacy of a pseudo health market, which commoditises illness, sustains the purchaser/provider split, enshrines competition for publicly funded NHS care and, crucially, competition between NHS providers.

It also bound many health economies to 'private finance initiatives', which represent a crippling and long-term financial drain upon budgets.

"As we know from the NHS constitution – the NHS belongs to all of us as citizens"

Far from strengthening the NHS, the pursuits of 'market disciplines' and of competition have been pointless diversions of energy. Alongside the folly of the Health and Social Care Act 2012, the market mentality has fragmented what should be a coherent and cohesive system of health prevention and illness provision and weakened the transparency and the robustness of both NHS commissioner and provider governance.

What action can health service provider boards take to try and improve things through governance?

It is essential that there is absolute reciprocal clarity between all provider board members about the governance task, the governance function and the role of the unitary board. This is significantly facilitated where there is a trained and effective company secretary.

So far as I have been able to establish, none of the trusts that have been subject to major public inquiries into profound failures of safety and of quality had a trained company secretary. A key task of the company secretary is to remind the board that the primary responsibility of every NHS organisation is to ensure that the safety and quality of care is their first and overriding concern.

A succession of public inquiries into avoidable deaths have concluded that boards had become preoccupied by financial pressures, the need to restructure or rebuild hospital premises, and by attention to government and regulatory targets. Together, those pressures deflected the board from their primary responsibility for the safety and well-being of patients.

As Robert Francis concluded in 2014, the issues he had uncovered in his public inquiry into hundreds of patient deaths at Mid-Staffordshire were not unique. Traces of the cultural issues there could be found across the NHS. Disturbingly, more recent research suggests that this may still be the case. It is essential that boards maintain a grip – though not a stranglehold – on the safety of care.

What can be done to improve the governance of CCGs?

In the short term, governing bodies of CCGs must do their best within the profound statutory constraints within which they operate to provide guidance and wise counsel to CCG officers and to their constituent GP practice members, in order to promote the interests of their local patient populations and the wider local community.

In the longer term, new statute will be needed to generate proper, transparent, and robust governance and accountability of the commissioning function and to ensure that commissioning is a collective function that straddles public health, illness and social care.

Are there positive developments in the governance of the NHS we should highlight?

I see some evidence of greater diversity in NHS boards, and I have seen positive transformations in the governance in some NHS providers.

I can think of one board that includes five medical directors. This has changed the focus and the quality of discourse in the boardroom. It required courage to break the mould – the law says you must have a medical director, but it does not say you must have only one.

That is a great example of a board using creativity and imagination to transform itself. For the most part, the law specifies minimum, but never maximum, levels of governance performance.

I have also encountered trusts that have found new and innovative ways to reach out to their local populations and examples where local authorities and the NHS have really tried to come together, lay aside their historic differences and to act as the servants, not the masters, of community need.

Has poor leadership contributed to the issues?

The NHS has been poorly served by politicians of all parties – and by the poor leadership provided by my own 'baby boomer' generation.

By contrast, in the face of a malign and sometimes toxic legacy and political climate, the current NHS leadership has, I think, been courageous and forthright in its diagnosis of the need for profound change and for a new funding settlement. It cuts corners and breaks rules, but nonetheless does so (for the most part) with the best of intentions.

Through no fault of the current generation of leaders and front-line staff, the NHS is caught in a vice between a decade of public sector austerity, NHS and local authority defunding and inexorable and accelerative demand escalation.

Why is demand for NHS services rising?

There are multifactorial drivers of demand. Some are lifestyle-led; such as the looming tsunami of obesity, costing the NHS £4.2 billion a year, or soaring alcohol dependence, which costs £3.4 billion a year. Lifestyle associated illness could have been substantially mitigated by wiser investment in education and prevention but other drivers of demand are inescapably demographic.

"Because of the strong association between most major illness groups and advancing age, the biggest driver of demand will be the ageing population"

However, because of the strong association between most major illness groups – cancer, heart disease, diabetes, dementia, arthritic degeneration and so on – and advancing age, the biggest driver of demand will be the ageing population.

Because of the post-war spike in birth rate, there will be a massive increase in the number of people who by 2022 will be 75 and by 2032 will be 85. Across England as a whole, the increase in the number of 85-year-olds between now and 2032 will be 77%, while by 2039 the number of 90-year-olds in our society will nearly triple.

Already more than 60% of acute NHS beds across the system are occupied by people 65 and above. Our acute hospitals have become de facto hospices – six out of ten older people currently die in a hospital bed. If current trends continue, by 2030, only one in ten people will die at home. This is ethically disgraceful and financially catastrophic.

There has never been an honest public debate in this country about the implications of our inexorably ageing society. As a result, we have failed to invest adequately to develop comprehensive hospice and hospice at home provision or to prioritise support to home based family carers.

We still are light years away from a system that brings together primary, community and social care and thus eliminates avoidable hospital admissions and delayed discharge, which would enable acute and specialist providers to do what they should exist to do – that is provide short, intensive episodes of care to those who are acutely, not chronically, ill. This will not be cheap.

Is additional funding the answer or do we need a more profound rethink?

We have got to get beyond the notion that health and social care are separable, they are not. The more frail, the more vulnerable someone is, the more dependent they – and their carers – are on a properly articulated health and social care system. Far too many people are victims of 'structural iatrogenesis'. We must bring together the funding, planning and governance of health and social care provision.

How do we ensure the future and positive development of the NHS?

The funding of the NHS and of social care is, of course, a matter for the community at large and for government. Given the track record of the latter, I would currently rate the chance of NHS survival as no better than evens.

"We still are light years away from a system that brings together primary, community and social care and thus eliminates avoidable hospital admissions and delayed discharge"

An equal possibility, is that we will move towards a two-tier system where people are encouraged, and indeed required, to take out private health insurance. What we know about two-tier systems is that they are more costly and less effective than the NHS.

The only chance of a radical new funding settlement for health and social care is predicated on the long overdue public and political debate about the implications of the ageing population.

In 2013, the House of Lords select committee's excellent 'Ready for Ageing' report concluded that government was unprepared for the ageing population and that there needed to be an urgent public debate on the profound implications of this reality for society as a whole. No such debate has ever occurred. We are in imminent danger of sleep walking over a precipice.

An additional £12 billion per annum needs to be raised for the next a decade or more. That money needs to be used, not to alleviate short-term pressures, but to transform the service – new models, new patterns, new locations of care.

Primary care and community care need to come together and to be resighted on health promotion and managing long-term conditions; mental and physical health care need to be integrated and end-of-life care and carer support need massive investment. Only then will our acute and specialist hospitals be able to perform, and perform outstandingly well, their core function of dealing with episodes of illness.

If that were to happen then the NHS will be alive and thriving when it reaches its centenary in 2048. It is the great civilising legacy that the previous generations bequeathed to all of us. If it is allowed to perish from neglect, then we will miss it more than we can ever imagine.

Interview by Henry Ker, editor of Governance and Compliance

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions