UK: From Quinn Direct To Sports Direct: Why Should Regulators Be Better Off Than Insurers When It Comes To Privileged Documents?

Last Updated: 27 September 2018
Article by Helen Evans and William Harman

In this article, Helen Evans and William Harman of 4 New Square argue that the recent decision in Financial Reporting Council Limited v Sports Direct International Plc [2018] EWHC 2284 (Ch) reignites the debate about whether regulators should be better off than insurers when it comes to seeking privileged documents belonging to the clients of professionals that they regulate or insure.

What did Quinn Direct and Sports Direct decide?

1. In last week's decision in Sports Direct, Arnold J held that the FRC (as regulator of the auditing profession) was entitled to call for privileged documents in the hands of that auditor's client even if that client did not consent. By contrast, 7 years ago in Quinn Direct v Law Society [2011] 1 WLR 308 the Court of Appeal held that insurers were not entitled to see documents belonging to a solicitor's client in circumstances where the client had not waived privilege. Is there a principled reason for this difference in approach?

2. Although the outcomes were different, both Sports Direct and Quinn Direct drew heavily on the speech of Lord Hoffman in R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2003] 1 AC 563. Having reviewed the case law (much of which concerned the Law Society) he set out at [32] two alternative justifications for the principle that regulators may inspect documents held by a professional even though they are privileged in favour of the professional's client.

3. Firstly, Lord Hoffmann suggested that there was in fact no infringement of the client's privilege in circumstances where the regulator was not entitled to use information disclosed by the professional for any purpose other than the investigation. Secondly, he pointed out that if there was an infringement of privilege in the reported cases, it was limited and authorised by the statutory powers of the Law Society. His decision- and the authorities reviewed in it- provide an important part of the backdrop to both Quinn Direct and Sports Direct.

The decision in Quinn Direct

4. In Quinn Direct, the Court of Appeal had to consider whether a professional indemnity insurer was entitled to require the Law Society (who had intervened in a firm of solicitors) to produce privileged documents belonging to the solicitors' clients that might have a bearing on whether insurers could decline cover to the solicitors on grounds of fraud. The Court of Appeal found that the insurers were not entitled to see the documents. They rejected Quinn's argument that insurers should be part of what Lord Hoffman had called a "circle of confidence" for the purposes of seeing privileged material in Morgan Grenfell. They drew on Lord Hoffman's observation that privilege was a "fundamental human right" and stated that any claims that it should be relaxed should be subject to "the greatest circumspection" [23].

5. The decision caused some controversy at the time. The Court of Appeal acknowledged that a consequence of it was that where a former client had not waived privilege by making a claim, solicitors were constrained in what they could tell their insurers about circumstances that might give rise to a claim in future. The Court of Appeal went so far as to say that "if the client will not waive his privilege to enable proper disclosure to be made, the consequence of the resulting conflict of interest will be that the insurance is vitiated or the notification inadequate but that is the problem of the solicitor not the client" [24]. The Court of Appeal treated that problem as a necessary side-effect of protecting a client's privilege.

6. Criticisms of the decision included the fact that, for many types of cover, the client is likely to be the one who suffers if no insurance is in place. The Court of Appeal's decision was also criticised for placing too little weight on the public interest in having an appropriately insured solicitors' profession, or the establishment of the Minimum Terms and Conditions by the SRA in order to achieve that aim (factors arguably not dissimilar to the public interest function performed by regulators)

The decision in Sports Direct

7. By contrast, in Sports Direct, the Court held that the production of documents belonging to an auditor's client to the FRC for the purposes of a confidential investigation into that auditor was not an infringement of any legal professional privilege of the underlying clients in respect of those documents. Arnold J also relied heavily on the decision of Lord Hoffman in Morgan Grenfell, although he drew on the matters set out at para. 4 above rather than the parts of the decision relied on by the Court of Appeal in Quinn.

8. In Sports Direct, Arnold J concluded that when a client sends his auditor privileged documents for the purposes of an audit, he does not waive privilege in them as against the auditor's regulator [56]. However, he went on to decide that "production of documents to a regulator by a regulated person solely for the purposes of a confidential investigation by the regulator into the conduct of the regulated person is not an infringement of any legal professional privilege of clients of the regulated person in respect of those documents" [84].

9. It seems to us likely that the Sports Direct decision will also attract its critics:

  • As Lord Hoffmann noted at [8] in Morgan Grenfell, privilege is a fundamental human right which can only be overridden by primary legislation.
  • The proposition that disclosure to a regulator solely for a confidential investigation avoids infringing privilege does not sit easily with the idea that privilege is absolute. To suggest that infringement of privilege depends on the purpose for which the document is disclosed is (according to Phipson on Evidence "novel and dangerous" because "the use to which a document is put is often not black and white but a shade of grey".
  • Once the FRC has seen a document for the purposes of a confidential investigation, what is it supposed to do next if it wants to rely on it in proceedings against an auditor? What if it knows that another regulator with whom it has a Memorandum of Understanding and a disclosure "gateway" (e.g. the FCA) would like to see the document for instance because it relates to a large corporate collapse? Would using the document for those purposes infringe privilege?
  • Any public policy grounds for enabling regulators to obtain privileged material could be said to apply by analogy to insurers who perform an important public function in providing the professional indemnity insurance (sometimes on mandatory minimum terms imposed by a regulator such as the SRA).

10. Pending appeal, the Sports Direct judgment is likely to cause difficulty for professionals deciding whether or not they are entitled to provide privileged material belonging to their clients to regulators. In some circumstances it will be possible to get round this difficulty by seeking a waiver of privilege by the client. In other cases that will not be possible, particularly if an investigation is high profile and the client fears adverse publicity. If no consent can be obtained, should auditors be confident that the decision of Arnold J in Sports Direct will hold?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions