UK: Sharper Governance With The New UK Code

Last Updated: 5 September 2018
Article by Peter Swabey

A leaner UK Corporate Governance Code seeks to refocus attention on the objective of governance, rather than merely ticking boxes

On 16 July, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) published the 2018 revision of the UK Corporate Governance Code, which will come into effect from 1 January 2019.

Companies should note that although reporting will not be required against the new code until 2020, they will be expected to apply the new provision requiring an explanation of proposed actions in the event that a resolution receives less than 20% support at the 2019 annual general meeting.

The new code is shorter and sharper than the existing one, with a greater focus on the application of its principles rather than on compliance (or the explanation of non-compliance) with its provisions.

This was one of the objectives that the FRC announced when it commenced the consultation process and reflected its concern that, in the minds of some companies, not to mention investors and their advisers, compliance had become a question of ‘ticking the box’ – rather than questioning whether the approach was right for an individual organisation.

“The new code has a greater focus on the application of its principles rather than on compliance with its provisions”

A feature of ICSA’s review of corporate reporting for our annual awards is that explanations of non-compliance with provisions are improving and in many cases demonstrate considerable thought about the best approach to a specific issue. Often a good explanation is better that rote compliance.

Although much of the new code is the same as the consultation draft published in December 2017, and ICSA’s response was discussed in the March 2018 edition of Governance and Compliance, there are some significant differences as a result of the FRC’s consideration of the 275 responses that it received to the consultation.

The new code is helpfully accompanied by a feedback statement and updated detailed guidance on board effectiveness.

1. Leadership and purpose

There is an increased focus on the board’s relationship with the workforce in the new code. Principle E has been extended to state that ‘The board should ensure that workforce policies and practices are consistent with the company’s values and support its long-term sustainable success,’ while provision 2 requires that the annual report ‘should include an explanation of the company’s approach to investing in and rewarding its workforce’.

This is defined in paragraph 50 of the guidance as including ‘those with formal contracts of employment (permanent, fixed-term and zero-hours) and other members of the workforce who are affected by the decisions of the board.’

Provision 5 has extended the requirements for workforce engagement so that the board must describe in the annual report how it has engaged with the workforce and other stakeholders, and how their interests and the matters set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 have been considered in board discussions and influenced decision-making.

Provision 5 goes on to specify the mechanism for workforce engagement and does so with more prescription than the consultation draft, proposing one or a combination of the following methods: a director appointed from the workforce; a formal workforce advisory panel; or a designated non-executive director. If the board has not chosen one or more of these methods, it should explain what alternative arrangements are in place and why it considers that they are a better option than the three proposed mechanisms.

“The company secretary is well placed to take responsibility for concerns raised by the workforce about conduct, financial improprieties or other matters”

The guidance on board effectiveness (paragraph 55) is helpful here, explaining that ‘provided the board’s approach delivers meaningful, regular dialogue with the workforce and is explained effectively; the code provision will be met.’ In the FT–ICSA Boardroom Bellwether survey, published on 6 August, we established that the most popular option amongst FTSE 350 companies is currently the designated non-executive director.

Finally in this section, the new principle E also addresses whistleblowing, with the workforce able ‘to raise any matters of concern’, and the guidance (paragraph 85) proposing the company secretary as a point of contact, as they are ‘well placed to take responsibility for concerns raised by the workforce about conduct, financial improprieties or other matters.’

2. Division of responsibilities

The major – and very welcome – change from the consultation is around independence, and specifically the independence of the chair (and note the terminology in the new code is now ‘chair’ rather than ‘chairman’).

The consultation draft required that the chair be independent throughout their term, rather than only ‘on appointment’ and stipulated criteria that would preclude independence, including a nine-year tenure, thereby removing the board’s discretion to assess whether or not a director is independent, except on a ‘comply or explain’ basis.

ICSA was one of a number of respondents to the consultation who felt that this misunderstood the role of the chair and conflated the concepts of independence and objectivity.

The FRC has accepted these representations and has reverted to the position that it is for the board to determine whether a director is independent and that the chair only need meet the independence criteria on appointment. However, the FRC remains focused on board refreshment and has introduced a term limit for the chair in the next section of the code.

Provision 15 addresses the issue of ‘overboarding’. Boards will now be required to ‘take into account other demands on directors’ time’ and ‘prior to appointment, significant commitments should be disclosed with an indication of the time involved.

Additional external appointments should not be undertaken without prior approval of the board, with the reasons for permitting significant appointments explained in the annual report.’ This latter point is important, particularly in the case of portfolio non-executive directors who will now have to seek approval from their existing board(s) before taking on a new role. This is not always currently the case and company secretaries will need to ensure that all board members understand the new requirement.

Finally in this section, it should be noted that some exemptions for smaller companies have been removed and they will now be expected to have at least half the board, excluding the chair, as independent NEDs with all directors facing annual re-election.

3. Composition, succession and evaluation

Two issues that the FRC clearly wanted to address were those of board refreshment and diversity. Principle K in the new code refers to the board having a ‘combination’ rather than ‘balance’ of skills and goes on to say that ‘consideration should be given to the length of service of the board as a whole and membership’.

As noted above, the new provision 19 on the tenure of the chair is very important, sufficiently so to quote it in full: ‘The chair should not remain in post beyond nine years from the date of their first appointment to the board. To facilitate effective succession planning and the development of a diverse board, this period can be extended for a limited time, particularly in those cases where the chair was an existing non-executive director on appointment. A clear explanation should be provided.’

“There is a vast difference between a board evaluation conducted by questionnaire and one conducted through interviews with the individual directors”

There was widespread commentary when the consultation draft was published that restricting the chair to nine years tenure would affect 19 chairs of FTSE 100 companies and would also particularly affect chairs who were internal appointments. Some claimed that this would also adversely affect board diversity.

On diversity, provision 23 requires that the annual report include an explanation of how the nomination committee’s process for appointments and approach to succession planning support developing a diverse pipeline.

It should also explain the organisation’s policy on diversity and inclusion, its objectives and linkage to company strategy, how it has been implemented and progress made. It should also explain the gender balance of those in the senior management and their direct reports.

The requirement on board evaluation has been retained and strengthened by the inclusion of a requirement (provision 23) that the annual report describe how the board evaluation has been conducted, the nature and extent of an external evaluator’s contact with the board and individual directors, the outcomes and actions taken, and how it has or will influence board composition. This greater focus is welcome and the point on how the board evaluation has been conducted is important as there is a vast difference between an evaluation conducted by questionnaire and one conducted through interviews with the individual directors.

In response to feedback received, the code has reverted to only requiring FTSE 350 companies to undertake an externally facilitated evaluation at least every three years.

4. Audit, risk and internal control

This section of the new code is largely unchanged from the consultation draft or, indeed, from the 2016 code.

Provision 24 reinstates the carve out for smaller companies to have a minimum of two audit committee members and provision 25 includes a specific new responsibility for the audit committee to provide advice – where requested by the board – on whether the annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is ‘fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the company’s position and performance, business model and strategy.’

The same provision also clarifies that the audit committee is responsible for conducting the tender process for the external auditor and ensuring prior approval of non-audit services is sought, considering the impact this may have on independence.

5. Remuneration

The major change in this section is around the degree to which the role of the remuneration committee is being refocused.

In the new code, the committee is to ‘review workforce remuneration and related policies and the alignment of incentives and rewards with culture, taking these into account when setting the policy for executive director remuneration.’

This is less challenging than the consultation draft requirement that it should ‘oversee remuneration and workforce policies and practices’, which many felt trespassed too far into management responsibilities.

ICSA lobbied for the pay of the company secretary to be a matter for the remuneration committee and we are pleased to see that this requirement has been retained both in provision 33 and in paragraph 80 of the guidance. This is an important safeguard of the independence of the role.

There are also some small but important enhancements to this section of the code – these are covered in Charlotte Fleck article on remuneration and so I will not go into more detail here, save to say that there is a focus on avoiding ‘rewards for failure’ and on post-employment shareholding requirements. There is also an expectation that ‘pension contribution rates for executive directors, or payments in lieu, should be aligned those available to the workforce.’

The new code creates an excellent opportunity for company secretaries to think about how its requirements will work best for their company and to demonstrate mastery of the new market expectations. There is a lot in the guidance, which is well worth close reading, and the chair and the board will need the active support of the secretariat if the company is to get the best value from its application of the code.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Travers Smith LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Travers Smith LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions