UK: UK Parent Company Liability For The Acts Or Omissions Of Its Foreign Subsidiary

Last Updated: 2 August 2018
Article by Tom Farrington


In AAA & Others v Unilever PLC and Unilever Tea Kenya Limited, the Court of Appeal recently confirmed the first instance decision that a UK parent company was not liable for the acts or omissions of its foreign subsidiary ("Unilever").

Increasing attempts to bring claims against UK parent companies

Unilever is the third Court of Appeal decision in the past two years on the subject of parent company liability for the acts or omissions of its foreign subsidiary, along with Lungowe and Others v Vedanta Resources PLC ("Vedanta") and Okpabi and Others v Royal Dutch Shell Plc ("Okpabi").


Proceedings were brought by 218 Kenyan citizens, who were employees, former employees or residents of the Kenyan tea plantation ("Plantation"), against Unilever Plc ("UPLC") (the UK based parent company) and Unilever Tea Kenya Limited ("UTKL") (the foreign subsidiary which owned and operated the Plantation in Kenya), for a failure to implement adequate safety measures to prevent the inter-tribal ethnic violence carried out by armed criminals on the Plantation, following the 2007 Kenyan presidential election. The claimants alleged that:

  • the risk of violence was foreseeable by UPLC and UTKL;
  • UPLC and UTKL owed a duty of care towards the claimants to protect them from the risks of violence; and
  • UPLC and UTKL breached that duty of care because of their failure to implement adequate safety measures to protect the claimants from violence.

First Instance

The applicable law

In determining whether UPLC owed a duty of care towards the claimants, Laing J. applied the three-stage test adopted in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman and Others ("Caparo Test"), as follows:

  • the damage suffered by the claimant should be foreseeable by the defendant;
  • there should exist a relationship of proximity or neighbourhood between the defendant and claimant; and
  • it should be fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care.


Applying the Caparo Test to the facts of the case and in particular considering the factors identified in Chandler v Cape Plc, Laing J. held that the claimants failed to meet the threshold of the Caparo Test and therefore did not have a good arguable claim against UPLC or UTKL.


Laing J. determined that the damage suffered by the claimants was not foreseeable by UPLC or UTKL. It was not enough for the claimants to simply show that following the 2007 Kenyan presidential election, violence was generally foreseeable in Kenya - the key issue was whether the particular damage suffered by the claimants was foreseeable by UPLC or UTKL. It was not because:

  • UPLC was a UK based parent company and whilst some post-election violence was foreseeable in that area, UPLC had no means of foreseeing that such atrocities would have occurred on the Plantation itself; and
  • nothing remotely comparable had ever before occurred on the Plantation.

Fair, just and reasonable

Laing J. considered that it would not be fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care on UPLC because:

  • UPLC was not required to act as a "surrogate police force to maintain law and order" in Kenya and UPLC had rightly relied on the Kenyan authorities to maintain such law and order; and
  • UTKL was occupying the Plantation.


Laing J. held, albeit obiter and with reluctance, that there was a sufficient degree of connection between the activities of and omissions to act by UPLC and the damage suffered by the claimants because of UPLC's involvement in UTKL's activities in Kenya.

The claimants appealed to the Court of Appeal in relation to the decision that UPLC and UTKL did not owe a duty of care. UPLC and UTKL appealed in relation to the decision that there was sufficient proximity.

Court of Appeal


The Court of Appeal unanimously ruled that the judgement of Laing J. was correct and that UPLC did not owe a duty of care towards the claimants. However, the Court of Appeal formulated its decision on different grounds, particularly in relation to the second limb of the Caparo Test, holding that there was no relationship of proximity or neighbourhood between UPLC and the claimants. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal did not address the first and third limbs of the Caparo Test, as the Kenyan Courts would be better placed to determine these issues and the claims were dismissed without proceeding to trial. Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court has been permitted, as it has in Vedanta.


The Court of Appeal reviewed in detail UPLC's corporate governance structure, crisis management policies, crisis escalation procedures, corporate risk management policies, financial accounts and knowledge of UPLC, that is, in relation to the prevention of crisis. The Court of Appeal held that UPLC did not possess the necessary degree of control over UTKL's operations in Kenya to substantiate the imposition of a duty of care, for the following reasons:

  • UPLC and UTKL were separate legal persons, each with their distinct business activities;
  • UTKL was not a direct subsidiary of UPLC;
  • there was no geographical proximity between UPLC and UTKL;
  • UTKL's management had never referred to UPLC for advice regarding the operation or management of the Plantation;
  • the day-to-day responsibility for the operation of the Plantation remained with UTKL;
  • UPLC did not have superior knowledge or expertise in relation to local political or ethnic matters, which was only within the knowledge of UTKL;
  • UPLC did not have knowledge or expertise of UTKL's systems of work;
  • whilst UPLC imposed various obligations on UKTL in relation to risk, these requirements were developed and implemented locally by UTKL;
  • UTKL had devised locally (without direction or advice from UPLC) the relevant policies for crisis and emergency management and training programmes; and
  • there was no evidence to suggest that UTKL was relying on UPLC to protect the claimants.

Group wide policies

The Court of Appeal, as in Okpabi, held that the presence of group-wide mandatory policies and standards issued by a UK parent company to be adopted by a foreign subsidiary was not in itself sufficient to establish a duty of care. It could be different where the parent company exerts direct control and influence over its foreign subsidiary, thus effectively retaining the day-to-day responsibility for the business operations overseas.

Parent company liability – two basic scenarios

The Court of Appeal echoed principles from recent cases regarding the two basic scenarios in which a UK parent company may owe a duty of care for the acts or omissions of its foreign subsidiary - where the UK parent has:

  • in substance taken over the management of the relevant activity of the subsidiary in place of or jointly with the subsidiary's own management; or
  • given relevant advice to the subsidiary about how it should manage a particular risk.

Having reviewed various UPLC and UTKL policies, financial accounts, reports and witness evidence given by the senior director of UTKL, the Court of Appeal decided that (i) UPLC did not take over the management of the relevant activity of UKTL, as this was managed locally by UTKL and (ii) UKTL did not receive relevant advice from UPLC in relation to the management of risks, which was in fact devised, implemented and overseen by UKTL in Kenya, by way of local risk management policies, assessments and operational plans.

The Court of Appeal cautioned that the circumstances identified above should only be treated as 'guidance' as to the relevant considerations and do not create a new separate test (distinct from the Caparo Test) for imposing a duty of care for parent company liability.

UK subsidiaries

Although Unilever, Vedanta and Okpabi deal with foreign subsidiaries of UK parent companies, the same principles will equally apply to a UK subsidiary of a UK parent company.

Lessons to be learned

The judgements in Vedanta, Okpabi and Unilever are an aide memoire of the dangers facing UK parent companies with operations overseas through a foreign subsidiary. In light of such risks, UK based multinational corporations should consider the issues listed below to counter the potential imposition of a duty of care:

  • carry out risk assessments;
  • consider the human rights risk within the relevant supply chains and operations overseas;
  • ensure that there is a distinction of business and operational activities and systems with the foreign subsidiary;
  • retain evidence to prove the independence of the foreign subsidiary by having separate boards, committees and processes;
  • avoid engaging in the day-to-day management and decision making of the operations in respect of the foreign subsidiary;
  • make sure that policies or procedures in relation to the operation of activities overseas are produced, developed and implemented by the foreign subsidiary locally, even if initiated by way of group-wide standards; and
  • ascertain a system for effective management of operational grievances locally.

Volkan Palanci (Co-Author) is a Trainee Solicitor from the Canary Wharf Group Plc and is currently on secondment in the Corporate Department at Fieldfisher and contributed to the article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions