UK: The Brexit White Paper: What It Means For Financial Services

Last Updated: 24 July 2018
Article by Nicholas Thompsell and John Worthy

Brexit in Black and White?

HM Government has finally published its long-awaited White Paper setting out its ambitions for the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union.  Perhaps fittingly for a paper that has tried to avoid the black-and-white certainties of Brexiteers and Remainers, the paper is not in fact white but a rather sombre mid-grey.

Separate regimes for goods and services

As regards the trade in goods, the White Paper errs on the side of those wanting the closest possible integration, with a proposal for a common free trade area for goods; a common rulebook for standards applicable to goods; and a commitment to ongoing harmonisation with EU rules on goods.

As regards services, however, and in particular financial services, a more nuanced approach is proposed, which one might describe as "managed equivalence". 

This would involve abandoning the current system of "passporting" under various EU single market directives under which authorisation in one member state allows privileged access to the other member states and which cover such areas as investments services, banking, insurance, insurance mediation and fund management in relation to UCITS and alternative investment funds as well as payment services and issuing electronic money.  The White Paper proceeds on the basis that to continue with passporting would not be compatible with the UK leaving the single market. 

The proposal to abandon passporting comes as no surprise to those within the City who have been following the debate.

Instead, it is proposed to rely on an expanded and modified version of the "equivalence" regimes that currently are allowed for under some directives to allow market access for businesses based in third countries whose regulatory regimes are deemed by the European authorities to provide equivalent standards to those applying in the EU.  This is proposed as a way to maintain the economic benefits of cross-border financial services traded between the UK and the EU within a new regulatory framework.  It is possible to see how this could provide a basis for cross-border activity currently provided by passporting under the "freedom of services".  This does not however provide a way of allowing UK firms relying on passporting to maintain European branches (under "freedom of establishment") to continue to do so except by obtaining authorisation for a branch or subsidiary within that country.  The White Paper offers therefore not so much a "regulatory passport" as a "regulatory visa waiver scheme".

Making equivalence work

There is no doubt that the day after Brexit occurs the UK's regulatory regime will be entirely equivalent to the regulatory regime applicable within the EU 27 – the UK will be adopting into its own the law the entirety of the acquis communautaire (the accumulated body of European law).  This is a necessary condition for the proposed reliance on equivalence, but is not of itself sufficient condition for "equivalence" to work.

The current equivalence framework does not apply across the full range of EU financial services regulation – for example there is no equivalence regime for banking, for UCITS managers or for insurers.  Where it does apply, access may depend on the type of clients (eligible counterparty, professional or retail) and regimes are different for cross-border operations and for firms wanting to operate from a branch - the so-called 'third country cross-border passport' under MiFID/MiFIR operates only where a Member State has opted for this.  The White Paper proposals will require something far broader and deeper if it is to get anywhere close to the benefits of the current passporting regime.  Given the difficulties of making changes in any single EU directive it will be challenging to have a comprehensive regime covering all the single market directives in place by the end of the proposed transitional period.

Commentators have emphasised the unsatisfactory nature of relying on a finding of equivalence if there is a risk that the deemed equivalence might be withdrawn, if and when the rules between the two regimes diverge.  The White Paper includes proposals to deal with this point, whilst preserving autonomy for the UK and the EU to continue to develop their own regulations.  It proposes a number of processes designed to encourage continued convergence and to manage the process if the laws do diverge.  These include:

  • an agreed and transparent methodology for assessing whether regulations are equivalent based on clear and common objectives;
  • a structured process for withdrawing a finding of equivalence with clear timelines and notice periods to allow businesses to plan if regulatory equivalence is not maintained; and
  • presumption, based on WTO rules against unilateral changes that narrow the terms of existing market access regimes.

New Institutional Structures

It is proposed that these arrangements would be the subject of new institutional arrangements.  The White Paper envisages a hierarchy of new bodies operating under an overarching institutional framework to be set under a Free Trade Agreement including a Governing Body (a political body operating at leader/ministerial level), a Joint Committee (a forum for discussion at a technical level), an "Economic Partnership" and other agreements outside the overarching framework.

Where the UK and the EU agree that rules are equivalent and one side later proposes a material rule change, the Joint Committee would consider whether a proposed new or amended UK rule remained equivalent with the EU's existing rule, or an existing UK rule remained equivalent to a proposed new or amended EU rule.  The idea seems to be that if the Joint Committee agree that the proposed change in rules do not affect equivalence, this would be binding, if not there would be opportunities to amend a proposed rule change to bring it within equivalence.

How these arrangements would interact with existing EU organs, including the Commission and the European Supervisory Authorities, or ESAs (the European Banking Authority; the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) remain to be worked out.  It is proposed that there would be arrangements for the UK to participate in EU bodies and agencies, but only in areas where the UK has committed to a common rule book.  A common rule-book is not proposed in the case of financial services so it may be presumed that the UK will not participate in the ESAs.  Presumably the ESAs would form part of, or advise, the EU's team on the Joint Committee.

The White Paper (probably correctly) deems it politically unacceptable in the UK for the UK to remain after Brexit subject to the Court of Justice of the European Union.  Instead it is suggested that the senior courts in both jurisdictions should maintain dialogue and for the Joint Committee to be empowered to act to preserve the consistent interpretation of agreements in the case of divergence.

Mobility, not Movement

In addition to the specific issues around regulation, the financial sector could be particularly badly affected by the ending of freedom of movement of people.  Up to now financial services businesses have been able to rely on freedom of movement to allow recruitment of staff easily from across the EEA and to move staff between offices.  Whilst the ending of free movement of people is one of the UK Government's "red lines", the Government proposes a system of "mobility arrangements" that will involve reciprocal arrangements to support businesses to provide services and allow talented people to move between the EU and the UK.  If this operates as is promised, then the ending of freedom of movement may not be as problematic as has been feared.

A workable solution?

There is no deal that would please both sides of the Brexit debate and which would have any chance of being accepted by the EU27. It is therefore entirely predictable that people from both sides of the debate have rushed to press to castigate this compromise proposal.  Some of the criticism has been ill-informed as commentators have failed to grasp the nuances of the proposals or the scope of what is proposed.  Other criticism is well-informed but perhaps underplays the need to accommodate the views of those on the other side of the Brexit polemic.  Certainly the proposals as regards financial services fall far short of what would be the City's preferred option of retaining passporting and in effect remaining within a single market for financial services.  Equally the proposals may be, and are being, criticised from the other side as offering only an illusion of freedom for the UK to set its own rules since in practice there would be enormous pressure to remain in step.

On one view the fact that these proposals are being attacked from both sides could be evidence that the Government is onto something.  Given the conflicting demands on the Government, the White Paper is ingenious in that on paper at least it offers a pragmatic middle way to deal with the key concerns on both sides whilst having some chance of being acceptable to Europe.  With goodwill on all sides (an important qualification), these proposals could form the basis of a plan that ought to be within the common interests of the UK and the EU.  For the financial services industry it offers a route to allow them to continue to operate cross-border without huge changes to their set-up and regulatory arrangements.  This this is not the security of holding a passport but there would a fair degree of certainty that this regulatory visa waiver will not be arbitrarily or suddenly withdrawn. 

Whether and how these proposals will be allowed to play out to offer such a solution will, in the end, depend on politics both within the UK and within Europe.  The first few days of the White Paper's political reception in Westminster have been less than encouraging.  Amongst the EU27 the issue may be whether politicians will be ready to act in the interests of consumers (who would not be well served by fragmenting economies that have become interlinked and interdependent) or prefer to act on protectionist impulses or the desire to punish the UK for abandoning the European project. 

For financial services businesses, the key requirement is a clear and predictable regime for cross-border trade.  The White Paper offers a glimmer of hope that this can be achieved, but the devil will be in the detail – and the lack of time to deal with it.  The biggest concern must be that these proposals have come very late within a negotiating process that was always challengingly short.  For firms that depend on cross-border activity, there can be no assurance that these proposals will be worked out in time.  The bookmakers are now offering "Evens" as the odds that Brexit will take place without a deal being reached. Firms will continue to need to plan their fall-back arrangements in the event that "Brexit" means "no-deal Brexit".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions