UK: Discount Rate Reform: A Defendant's Perspective

Last Updated: 5 June 2018
Article by Peter Whitehead

Most Read Contributor in UK, November 2018

The Civil Liability Bill sets out an effective new framework for how, when and by whom the discount rate will be calculated. The changes improve transparency and accountability in the process, which should lead to a more stable and fairer method for setting the rate in the future.

A real-world approach, based on how claimants actually invest their damages is central to the draft legislation. This is critical to establishing a fairer and more robust framework for setting the rate, in order to ensure the 100% compensation principle is properly adhered to.

The previous framework led to a wholly theoretical rate that failed to reflect the investment practices of claimants and led to chronic over-compensation. Indeed, the UK is currently an international outlier; at minus 0.75% our discount rate is the lowest, and accordingly the most costly, of the world's major economies.

The proposed changes have already begun to benefit consumers, with car insurance premiums falling at their sharpest rate in four years (January to March). An average motor policy is now £13 cheaper than it was a year ago. 26 insurers, representing 86% of the motor and liability markets, have pledged to pass on future savings to consumers following enactment of the Bill.

How should the rate be set?

The Bill confirms that claimants are 'low risk', not 'no risk' investors, judged by reference to their actual investment practices. This is a helpful change, as it will now reflect real world investment behaviours and will more accurately reflect how claimants invest their awards. Research undertaken by the Ipsos Mori Social Research Institute in 2013 demonstrated that injured parties invest in a mixed portfolio of investments, so it has a solid grounding in reality.

The option of a PPO is retained, so if a claimant truly wishes to take no investment risk and be unaffected by the discount rate, PPOs operate to transfer that investment risk to the compensator. The low uptake of PPOs, even when the discount rate was set at 2.5%, arguably demonstrates that most claimants prefer a lump sum award and are therefore prepared to accept some investment risk.

The question of what rate the new methodology will produce is still up in the air. Interestingly the Government advised their previous September 2017 estimate of 0-1% was only intended to be an indication of the potential scale of the change. Unhelpfully the Government now claims it would be inappropriate to speculate further. Despite this, the smart money probably still backs this previous estimate which is operating as the ballpark for current settlements in the market, where trial is not imminent.

Following criticism about the evidence available when considering setting the rate, the Government will issue a further call for evidence on the details of claimant investment behaviour. The necessity of this requirement is questionable, with the Government already having received a range of evidence of claimant investment behaviour, particularly given the potential to further delay the enactment of the Bill. Perhaps a more useful question that should be asked is how claimants should invest their lump sum.

The Lord Chancellor and the appointed expert panel will consider the possibility of different rates for different cases, although it remains to be seen whether this option will be exercised. Both Ontario and Hong Kong adopt dual rates, resulting in two or three rates respectively for a single case. The ABI has stated that the Ontario model would be their preference, or it may be that the expert panel comes up with something entirely new. Allowing different rates for different heads of loss for example would cause logistical difficulties, uncertainty and further complicate the process.

The Bill requires that in any review, the Lord Chancellor and the expert panel will also investigate whether there are ways in which PPO use could be increased. PPOs are not commonly favoured by claimants and therefore only limited increases in demand may be seen. It is possible to question what extent under the current system claimants are receiving appropriate PPO advice, given advisors' potential conflicts of interest. It is therefore prudent that such an investigation is undertaken.

The review may also consider whether investment management costs should be recoverable as a head of damage. The Bill includes provision for fees to be included as a consideration when setting the discount rate, which would be calculated by reference to returns that are net of charges both for management and fees for advice, negating the need for such costs to be recoverable as a head of damage. To allow such a head of damage is contentious; it would necessitate expert reports on both sides, which would only serve to increase costs. It is to be hoped confirmation that these fees will not be included as a head of damage is obtained during the Bill's passage through the Lords.

Who should set the rate?

The Lord Chancellor will set the rate in consultation with an expert panel consisting of the Government Actuary and four other individuals with experience in actuarial work, managing investments, economics, and consumer matters as relating to investments. This is a useful composition for the panel, providing non-partisan experts are utilised.

As proportionately more experts work with claimants than defendants, an appropriate balance will need to be struck in the appointment process and any potential conflicts of interest will need to be addressed. It is also imperative the selected experts must possess experience in the actual management of investments for claimants, rather than just in providing advice on a potential investment strategy.

The quorum for the expert panel is to be increased from previous proposals to four, one of whom must be the Government Actuary. The decision to set the discount rate will continue to rest with the Lord Chancellor, who must provide reasons for the chosen rate. Given the political hot potato the rate has become, this provides an improved level of transparency and accountability previously lacking from the process. However the Chancellor only has to publish information in relation to the expert panel's response that is considered appropriate, which could operate to obscure the process somewhat.

When will the rate be set?

The initial review of the rate must be started within the 90 day period once the Bill becomes law and a decision must be reached within 180 days. The expert panel will also need to be convened for the review, which is likely to take up to three months to recruit. Given the need for speedy enactment, these provisions have the potential to further delay the inception of a new rate after the Bill has been enacted. Consideration should be given to refining and limiting these timeframes.

Each subsequent review must be commenced within three years of the last review. Given large loss cases typically take up to five years to resolve, there is likely to be the possibility that either a claimant or compensator might seek to use a pending review to their advantage in the context of a settlement negotiation. A longer review period of 5 – 7 years may prevent such 'gaming' tactics. However the frequency of review should lead to smaller changes in the discount rate and therefore a lower impact from any rate change.

Next steps

Whilst the Bill does make great strides in setting out a workable basis on which the new discount rates will be established, the minutiae, including what the new rate will be, will remain up in the air until the Bill becomes law and the first review takes place. It is somewhat disappointing the provisions link with the more controversial whiplash reforms, as this may delay the passage of the Bill in an already uncertain Brexit laden legislative timetable.

For the immediate future, the market is already adapting and adopting a pragmatic approach, with claimants and insurers both agreeing settlements on a rate of between 0-1% in all cases except for those cases where trial is imminent.

Once enacted, insurers will need to remain vigilant in respect of the implementation of the new methodology, to ensure the legislation actually achieves fairness when setting the rate and prevents claimants from continuing to be overcompensated.

Originally published in MASS Insight magazine

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions