UK: Auditing The Auditors – Potential Review By The CMA?

Last Updated: 30 May 2018
Article by Marta Isabel Garcia and Anna Victoria Delahey

The structure of the UK audit sector, and the position of the 'Big Four' within it, has been a matter of public debate for quite some time. Increasingly this year with the demise of Carillion there has been growing pressure to look more closely again at the audit market to help increase competition, especially for clients which may have limited options available to them. Now, in May 2018, a new UK Parliamentary report has urged the UK Government to refer the statutory audit market to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA"). The terms of any such referral "should explicitly include" consideration of breaking up the 'Big Four' audit firms into smaller, audit-only organisations. It will be an interesting development to see if the CMA will now for a second time carry out such a major probe into the largest UK auditors. It awaits to be seen what action if any the CMA take in this respect.

Background

Carillion

Carillion was a major UK multinational construction and facilities management company which entered compulsory liquidation in January 2018 with liabilities of nearly £7 billion and just £29 million in cash. It was a major strategic supplier to the UK public sector (from building roads and hospitals to providing school meals and defence accommodation). The UK Government had committed £150 million of taxpayers' money to keeping essential services running, but over 2,000 people lost their jobs and a pension liability of around £2.6 billion was left.

Two Parliamentary Select Committees (i.e. the Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy ("BEIS") and Work & Pensions Committees Committee ("WPE") were tasked with investigating the collapse of Carillion and jointly issued a report in May 2018.

This report scrutinised the role of the 'Big Four' audit firms which it said had all earned large fees from Carillion for audit and other advisory services. The report described the 'Big Four' as operating an "oligopoly" which it wanted to see broken up:

  • "We recommend that the Government refers the statutory audit market to the Competition and Markets Authority. The terms of reference of that review should explicitly include consideration of both breaking up the 'Big Four' into more audit firms, and detaching audit arms from those providing other professional services." (pargraph 123)

MPs are hoping that the Government's appointment of Andrew Tyrie, a former MP and influential chair of the parliamentary Treasury Select Committee, as chair of the CMA will give the competition regulator the necessary impetus to re-open the earlier closed enquiry or set up a follow-up to look at helping increase competition and deal with conflicts issues.

However, it is not yet certain what action if any the CMA will take. A spokesperson at the CMA has indicated that they are however working closely with the Financial Reporting Council ("FRC") whose role it is to regulate the quality of UK company audits to see what more can be done to improve standards and quality of service. At the moment, the message is that the CMA is open to looking at the audit sector further and will work with the FRC to assess what action, if any, it chooses to take.

Prior UK competition market investigation

The first audit market review started back in 2011, following a recommendation by the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee, that the CMA's predecessor, the Office of Fair Trading ("OFT") refer the market for statutory audits of large companies to the UK's Competition Commission ("CC"). The CC carried out an in-depth, two year 'market investigation,' taking evidence from numerous interested parties and carrying out detailed economic analyses of the market.

The CC reported on the matter in 2013 and found that competition was restricted in the audit market due to factors which inhibited companies from switching auditors and by the incentives that auditors had to focus on satisfying management rather than shareholder needs.

Once the OFT and CC had merged in 2014 to form the CMA, the latter issued legally binding orders in September 2014. Those orders included:

  • a requirement for FTSE 350 companies to put their statutory audit engagement out to tender at least every 10 years; and
  • measures to strengthen the accountability of the external auditor to the Audit Committee and reduce the influence of management.

It would appear that these remedies were not as successful as hoped by the industry where latest figures from various advisory agencies indicate that the orders had the opposite effect. It is understood the 'Big Four' now audit 99% of FTSE 100 companies, 97% of FTSE 250 companies and that only one FTSE 100 company is audited by a mid-tier firm - that firm only retained this business in a recent audit retender.

It is therefore debatable whether the CMA can affect any real meaningful change or not a second time around - or even if - the concerns are real competition questions for the CMA given the main concern is a perceived lack of quality or insufficient independent rigour of the audit market.

Potential implications

In any event, there appears to be some considerable momentum building behind taking further regulatory action in this market. Two recent indications stand out:

  • The Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, Greg Clark, has said he was "not averse" to reconsidering competition in the audit market, as concentrated markets tended to act against the interests of consumers (March 2018).
  • Similarly, Andrew Tyrie, now the incoming Chair of the CMA, has said that "something needs to be done" about the audit market (April 2018).

Despite the fact that the CMA looked at this market in detail as recently as 2014, the CMA may well feel a growing need to respond to Parliamentary and ministerial pressure, plus the personal interest of its new chair, Mr Tyrie. Precedent for that may be seen in the OFT's decision to look at the market in 2011, after accepting a recommendation by a House of Lords select committee.

The CMA has various options at its disposal, including consulting on and / or opening a six-month 'market study,' or an in-depth two-year 'market investigation', or even taking potential enforcement action against specific firms (albeit the latter would appear unlikely for the moment).

A fresh two-year CMA 'market investigation,' gives the CMA legally binding powers to demand information and to make orders. A market investigation would take and consider carefully detailed submissions from interested parties. That could provide an important opportunity for firms to express their views as to how the market is operating and whether in fact the recommendation to split the 'Big Four' is beneficial or not to industry.

A six-month 'market study' could serve as a prelude to a full 'market investigation' or remain a stand-alone exercise, at the end of which the CMA might make recommendations or propose to take no further action. Only where sufficiently robust evidence existed of anti-competitive conduct might the CMA choose to take enforcement action against specific firms, but, this does not appear to be what the report is seeking nor the most adequate tool for the CMA to review the sector based on the current concerns.

As to whether any break-up would achieve the outcome of increasing competition and dealing with the conflicts issue is debatable. Some suggest the process would be futile if the international branches of the auditors remain concentrated. Nor would it necessarily add any new competition on the audit market, but instead create smaller players potentially with limited industry expertise and resources, unable to replicate the necessary infrastructure to service clients (whether national or global).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions