UK: FI And D&O International Review, May 2018 – Case Summaries

Last Updated: 21 May 2018
Article by Clyde & Co LLP

Most Read Contributor in UK, November 2018

Case summaries

Financial Institutions - Liability

No duty of care owed to experienced borrower

Deslauriers and another (Appellants) v Guardian Asset Management Limited (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) [2017] UKPC 34

Guardian Asset Management ("GAM") advanced a commercial loan to the Deslauriers in October 2007 for development. After agreed extensions, the Deslauriers defaulted on their loan and GAM sued for repayment and interest in 2009. The Deslauriers denied liability, although they did not dispute the non-payment, and counterclaimed for damages for a loss of TTD 24m for being unable to complete the project due to GAM's failure to advance further loans (which would go over lending limits).

They argued that GAM's failure to disclose these lending limits at earlier stages of negotiation was a misrepresentation and that GAM made a negligent misstatement, failing in its duty of care to disclose the existence of lending limits.

In 2011, judgment was given against the Deslauriers in the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago. In 2016, the Deslauriers' appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago. This appeal was heard by the Privy Council.

It held that there was no misrepresentation; there was no evidence, prior to entering the loan agreement, that GAM would be asked to make further, future loan advances for the project to be completed. Therefore, the lending limits were not relevant and there was no misrepresentation.

Regarding duty of care, citing Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465, the Court held that there had been no assumption of responsibility. In a commercial, arm's length relationship between experienced lenders and borrowers, it would be very unusual for the relationship to give rise to a duty of care to advise the borrower of its internal lending policies or any external influences on its approach to evaluating loan applications. The appeal was dismissed.

Financial advice firm not vicariously liable for agent's actions in relation to property development scheme

Frederick & Ors v Positive Solutions (Financial Services) Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 431

The appellants ("A") were introduced to a property development scheme run by an acquaintance's business partner ("W"), who was an IFA, appointed as the respondent firm's agent. The money needed for the investment was raised by re-mortgaging A's properties. W submitted the applications for loans through an online portal with a bank, to which he had access because he was an agent of the respondent.

A argued that the respondent was vicariously liable for W's actions. The Court of Appeal held it was not. The judge at first instance had correctly identified the appropriate test as: "(1) was the harm wrongfully done by an individual who carried on activities as an integral part of the business activities of the defendant and for its benefit, rather than his activities being entirely attributable to the conduct of a recognisably independent business of his own or that of a third party; and (2)... whether the commission of the wrongful act is a risk created by the defendant by assigning those activities to the individual in question, in which case liability will be imposed."

W was engaged on a "recognisably independent business" of his own (namely, the property investment scheme). W's "use of the portal was simply the means by which he was able to obtain funds from the appellants to invest in the scheme." W had been acting on a frolic of his own and the receipt of commission by the respondent did not alter that position, as it had been generated automatically by the bank and had been held by the respondent in a suspense account. Furthermore, it is well established that merely providing the opportunity for wrongdoing is not sufficient, without more, to give rise to vicarious liability.

Directors – Breach of Fiduciary Duties

Court declines to grant relief under s1157 Companies Act 2006

(1) Cullen Investments Ltd (2) Eric John Watson (3) Cullen Investments Ltd v (1) Julian Brown (2) Quentin Brown (3) Kauri Investments Ltd [2017] EWHC 2793 (Ch)

The underlying action ([2017] EWHC 1586 (Ch)) was a consolidation of various proceedings, comprising claims by Cullen and by Mr Watson against both Defendants, and a derivative claim by Cullen against both Defendants. Having succeeded in overcoming the high barrier to pursue derivative claims, the Defendants (D1 and D2) were held at trial to be in breach of their fiduciary duties, breach of their duties under the Companies Act 2006 (CA) and breach of their duties under the common law (D1 was also found to be in breach of his contractual duties). In particular, D2 was held to have breached his duty under s175 CA to avoid conflicts of interest following an agreement to accept profits from a development project that his brother (a party to a joint venture contract of which both brothers were directors) had entered into in his personal capacity (i.e. depriving the joint venture of the opportunity).

In these proceedings, D2 applied for relief from liability under s1157 Companies Act 2006 which provides for relief in proceedings for negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust against an officer of a company if it appears that the officer is or may be liable but he acted honestly and reasonably and, having regard to all the circumstances, he ought fairly to be excused.

D2's application was dismissed. The Court held that whilst D2 had not been dishonest (for example, D2 genuinely thought that the transaction had been authorised by the joint venture partner), he had failed to act reasonably by not disclosing his interest in the profits to be obtained from the project and not seeking specific authorisation to do so. He should have realised that he would need to do this, especially as he was a lawyer. Whilst the Court did not grant relief in this case, the Court's approach demonstrates that it will look at all the facts to determine whether the director in question acted honestly and reasonably in the circumstances, even if what the director believed to be the case was not, in fact, the case. Further, it acknowledged that, in principle, relief could be sought in cases involving an account of profits.

Shareholders' ability to discover breach could not be attributed to company so as to bar claim against directors on limitation grounds

Julien & Ors v Evolving Tecknologies & Enterprise Development Co Ltd [2018] UKPC 2

A company's former directors appealed to the Privy Council against a decision of the Court of Appeal (Trinidad & Tobago) that a claim brought against them by the respondent company ("Eteck") was not time-barred under s14 of the Limitation of Certain Actions Act 1997 (which is in materially identical terms to s32 of the English Limitation Act 1980).

Eteck, a state-owned company, on the decision of its directors, invested in a technology company and suffered loss. An audit was carried out into the cause of the loss by a subsequent government and Eteck brought proceedings against the directors alleging negligence and failure to conduct full due diligence. The claim was brought outside of the prescribed 4 year limitation period. Eteck argued that the term should be extended as the deliberate breach of duty resulted in it not being discovered in time. The directors argued that it could have been discovered by the minister of finance (the sole shareholder of Eteck) and, as such, discoverability was attributable to Eteck.

The Privy Council dismissed the appeal. There was no trigger sufficient to put the minister on inquiry as to the breach and it had been correct for the Court of Appeal to approach the question thus. As to attribution, in obiter remarks, the Privy Council expressed the view that a shareholder's ability to discover a breach could not be attributed to the company so as to allow time to run for limitation purposes; shareholders are under no duty to seek out breaches which could form a claim against the company's directors. Whilst decisions of the Privy Council are not binding on the English Courts, given that the limitation provision is materially identical to the equivalent provision in the Limitation Act 1980, this decision may be persuasive on English Courts that find themselves faced with this issue.

To view the article please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions