UK: Age Discrimination And Enhanced Redundancy Schemes

Last Updated: 11 November 2008

Two recent decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) provide guidance on what employers must do in order to justify age discrimination



The Employment Equality (Age Regulations) 2006 (the "Regulations") outlaw direct age discrimination (where a person (A) treats another person (B) less favourably than another on grounds of B's age) and indirect discrimination (where A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice which he applies equally to others but which puts people of B's age group at a particular disadvantage and specifically does put B at that disadvantage). So, in the context of a redundancy scheme, if B is 30, to make a higher award to those over 40 would be directly discriminatory against B; and to use a higher multiplier for those with 10 years' service could also be indirectly discriminatory against B (because she is less likely to have been at work that long).


A's acts will not be unlawful if A is able to justify them by showing that they were a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Unlike the other strands of discrimination law, direct as well as indirect age discrimination may be justified in this manner.


Regulation 33 provides an exemption for redundancy schemes which broadly mirror (but are more generous than) the conditions under the statutory redundancy payments scheme. These schemes will be lawful even though they do give different benefits depending on age.


The Facts

In MacCulloch -v- ICI plc, Ms MacCulloch was almost 37 and had seven years and eight months' service when she was made redundant. Applying criteria based on both age and length of service (capped at 10 years), ICI awarded her just over 55% of her annual salary. A 40 year old with 10 years' service would have received more than 97%.

In Loxley -v- BAE Systems Land Systems (Munitions & Ordnance) Ltd, when the employer's scheme was originally set up, the employer's compulsory retirement age was 60, at which time the employee could draw a full pension under the final salary scheme. Hence, awards were made only up to the age of 60, and there were tapering provisions for ages 57 to 60 to avoid any windfall to those able to draw an early pension and also receive payments under the redundancy scheme. Mr Loxley took voluntary redundancy aged 61 (by which time the retirement age had increased to 65) and he was excluded from the scheme (although a new structure for future redundancies had been negotiated with the unions which would pay some additional benefits up to 65). If he had been 57, he would have received two years' salary and six months' pay in lieu.

In both cases, it was admitted that discrimination had occurred. Therefore the issue to resolve was whether the employers could justify their actions.

The Decision

In MacCulloch, the employer argued that the scheme rewarded loyalty, and was structured in a way which cushioned the effect of redundancy on older workers (who were more vulnerable in the job market) by giving them larger payments; it was a generous scheme which was popular with the workforce, so that it fulfilled its aim in encouraging voluntary redundancies. Indeed, ICI had consulted over the possibility of creating a scheme falling within Regulation 33, but this had been strongly opposed. The Tribunal accepted that these were legitimate aims and ruled in favour of the employer.

In Loxley, the Tribunal held that it was a legitimate aim for the employer to divide up the financial pot available to ensure an equitable distribution of payments amongst the workforce. In doing that, it was entitled to have regard to the fact that employees over the age of 60 could draw an immediate pension, therefore the discrimination that had taken place was not unlawful.

Both claimants appealed.


The Test For Justification

In both cases, the EAT set out the test that an employer must meet in order to justify discriminatory treatment or practices. The Tribunal (and not the employer) must be satisfied that the measures:

  • are appropriate with a view to achieving the objectives pursued; and
  • are reasonably necessary to achieve that aim.

In considering the question of proportionality, the Tribunal must balance objectively the discriminatory effect of the measure in question with the needs of the undertaking, carrying out a critical analysis which must be reflected in its decision.

The EAT commented that it considered the test for both direct and indirect discrimination to be the same (bearing in mind that the case law to date has been concerned with indirect discrimination only). The ECJ's decision on a similar point in the Heyday case is expected shortly (although the Advocate-General's Opinion published this week suggests that the ECJ is likely to take a similar approach to the EAT).

The Decision

The EAT held that, although the aims put forward by the employers were legitimate, the Tribunal had failed properly to assess whether their measures were proportionate. In MacCulloch, it should have demonstrated a "considered recognition of the degree of difference in the payment made to the Claimant and the comparator, and an assessment of whether [that degree of difference] was reasonably necessary to achieve the objectives of the scheme". However, in performing that exercise, it could "have regard to the impact which a different scheme would have on the whole range of employees".

In Loxley, the Tribunal should have "grappled with the question whether it was proportionate to exclude the claimant from any redundancy payment altogether because of his entitlement to a pension" but "nowhere ... is there any assessment of what his pension would be, or how that related to the redundancy payments". However, the EAT did comment that tapering provisions where an employee is able to receive immediate pension benefits "will, we suspect, be very readily justified".

Both cases were remitted to the Tribunal to be heard again.


Following these decisions, employers must be even more careful to justify redundancy schemes that do not follow the statutory scheme.

The Employment Tribunal has since considered an enhanced redundancy scheme in Galt & Others -v- National Starch & Chemical Limited (another ICI group company), accepting that the legitimate aim of the payments under the scheme was to avoid the possibility of industrial unrest; but finding that the scheme was still unlawful as it was not a proportionate way of achieving that aim (the employer had not consciously addressed the age differential when considering the need to avoid the unrest).

What do these cases mean for employers? If you have a redundancy scheme that pays more than statutory redundancy, you should first look at whether the age bands and criteria you use mirror those of the statutory scheme. If they do, your scheme will probably be lawful under Regulation 33. If your criteria do not mirror the statutory scheme, and benefits are different for employees of different ages, it discriminates on grounds of age and you should then consider whether that discrimination can be justified. First consider the aims of the scheme, and whether they are legitimate. The cases show that aims such as rewarding loyalty, cushioning the impact for older employees, avoiding a windfall to some employees, and reducing the likelihood of industrial unrest are likely to be legitimate. The next stage is to consider whether the details of the scheme itself are reasonably necessary to achieve those aims.

A practical way of going about this would be to produce a series of worked out examples to demonstrate how you have carved up the financial pot, and to document how you reached the decision to treat (or, where the scheme was drawn up some time ago, to continue to treat) certain age groups differently to achieve your purpose. Also it may be worth consulting the employees as a group: the EAT did comment that, although it could not on its own make an unlawful act lawful, the fact that a provision has been agreed with employees collectively could be a relevant consideration to weigh when considering proportionality.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions