UK: Hard Boiled Or Poached?

Getting Tough With Unscrupulous Ambitions
Last Updated: 28 October 2008
Article by Caroline Fallon

In the current economic climate many businesses are braced against 'talent raids' by competitors – and a series of recent decisions by the House of Lords in Mainstream and the High Court in Kynixa has shown that tough post-termination employment restrictions to protect business interests from talent poachers are now much more likely to be upheld by the courts. Smartlaw explains.

Every employee owes a duty of good faith and fidelity to his or her employer. Broadly speaking this means that employees are free to seek new positions with competitors, but they must not take steps, such as soliciting from the client or employee base or promoting a competitor's business, which would breach those broad obligations.

In addition, express post-termination restrictions in an employment contract can head off such competitive attacks even after an individual has left employment, though to be enforceable the restrictions must protect only legitimate business interests (employees and/or clients) and have no wider scope (eg, they should be time-limited) than is necessary so to do.

Where an employee appears to have acted in breach of these obligations, their original employer may have grounds to seek an injunction to prevent any further breach and damages to make good any financial loss. And there may also be grounds to apply for similar remedies against the new employer.


In Mainstream Properties Limited v Young, a Mr de Winter stood accused of inducing breach of contract and Mainstream sought damages. Finance had been provided by de Winter for a property acquisition by a joint venture in which two Mainstream employees were involved. The employees diverted the acquisition opportunity away from Mainstream and into the joint venture. Whilst de Winter knew that the employees were contractually bound to Mainstream, he did not think their actions breached their contractual obligations. Mainstream sued de Winter for damages saying that he had induced the breaches.

The House of Lords held that de Winter was not liable because he had not intended to cause damage to Mainstream's business interests. The decision thus makes clear that an essential element of guilt in this context is that the wrong-doer should specifically intend to interfere with the contract; it is not enough simply to show that he knew of the existence of the contract term which has allegedly been breached.


Kynixa was a joint venture company, established in 2001, with three key employees – Hynes, Preston and Smith – two of whom, Hynes and Preston, were also shareholders. A shareholders agreement sought to prevent the soliciting of employees and clients for up to 12 months after a shareholder had ended his or her "connection" with Kynixa.

In November 2006 Hynes told Kynixa's two founders that he was considering leaving. The three of them continued to discuss Hynes's departure right up until February 2007; when asked what he intended to do next Hynes said that he had no specific plans.

The company's two founders feared that Preston might follow Hynes. She told them that she too was uncertain about her future with the company having recently met a former colleague who had invited her to return to her old employer.

In reality Hynes, Preston and Smith were all negotiating a move to Scion Management Limited, a subsidiary of Paribas and one of Kynixa's competitors. In April and May 2007 the three left. At the end of May 2007 Kynixa discovered that all three were now employed by Scion. Claims were brought for breach of the duty of fidelity which, in the case of Hynes and Preston, included breaches of their duties as shareholders and of the post-termination restrictions contained in the shareholders agreements.

It was a bad day in court for the defendants. Not only did the High Court uphold Kynixa's claims, it also refused the defendants leave to appeal. Hynes was ordered to pay £250,000 as an interim sum towards costs, and Preston £100,000 with costs to be assessed. Kynixa's total costs are estimated to be in the region of £1 million.

All three employees had breached their duty of fidelity because they had deliberately mislead their employer when asked direct questions about what was going on. This was also a breach of the fiduciary duty owed by Hynes and Preston as shareholders. In effect, they all ought to have disclosed, when asked, that negotiations were taking place with Scion.

The court took the following factors into account:

  • Hynes and Preston were senior employees;
  • Kynixa operated in a small and competitive market;
  • Kynixa's client agreements were for fixed terms of up to 2 years; and
  • as shareholders, Hynes and Preston would gain financially from their shareholdings.

Against this background the 12-month post-termination restrictions were held by the court to be the only way Kynixa could protect its sensitive business information because non-disclosure of trade secrets could only have been assured by restricting the post-termination activities of the three defendants.


UBS Wealth Management lost 75 of its employees to Vestra Wealth. On one day alone a Mr Scott, the former employee who established Vestra, hand-delivered 52 letters of resignation. The case thus centred on a UBS claim that four key individuals, led by Scott, had acted as "recruiting sergeants" for Vestra as part of a plan to unlawfully poach staff and clients.

The employees joined UBS as part of its 2004 acquisition of two stockbroking firms, Laing & Cruickshank and Scott, Goodman & Harris. During their time at UBS they were paid large salaries and substantial bonuses. Their UBS contracts of employment contained restrictions seeking to prevent them from trading in competition and from soliciting staff and clients, both during employment and for some time thereafter.

Email evidence for the defence sought to argue that all of the departing employees decided to leave because they shared a raft of concerns about how UBS was handling its wealth management business. But the email correspondence was held by the court to be "unconvincing" and merely repeating "the party line".

UBS obtained an interim 'springboard' injunction, pending full trial, and Vestra was stopped from any further solicitation. The court also noted that:

  • ..."loyalty, fidelity and diligence from its staff" can be expected by every business as "part of the bargain for which they [the employees] are paid". In this context, the judge added, and as has long been established by case law, the more senior the employee, the higher the degree of fidelity required; and
  • whilst the public interest requires that individuals be allowed to deploy their talents to generate profits and employment for themselves and others, and whilst Mr Scott was entitled to start up his own new business and attract clients and former colleagues to it, this should have been done within the confines of the contractual obligations owed by employees to their current employer.

What can you do?

As an employer seeking to protect yourself against poachers outside the organisation and unscrupulous entrepreneurs within, there's plenty you can do to make the most of this improved legal landscape.

When an employment relationship begins, carefully draft the terms of the employment contract to restrict the activities of the employee during the notice period and after employment has come to an end. These restrictions should preclude soliciting (or doing business with) clients or prospective clients and should also prevent the employee from starting a new business in competition. And remember: it is crucial that post-termination restrictions are tailored to the precise facts of your business and its employment relationships.

The term "confidential Information" must be carefully defined in any employment contract and should go beyond the common law duty because once employment has ended the common law protects only information which can be described as a "trade secret", setting the bar too high for most normal purposes.

Consider requiring employees to work out their notice period on 'gardening leave'. This is an effective way of ensuring that they stay out of the operational arena during the potentially sensitive denouement of their employment relationship with you.

Once an employee has given notice, you have many issues to consider as an employer. Find out as much as possible about his plans and the organisation he is joining. If his contract with you empowers and requires contact with clients whom you now wish to protect, put him on gardening leave. If instead he works out his notice, keep your eyes and ears open for any changes in behaviour. Alarm bells should ring if he starts to include personal contact information (such as a mobile phone number) on business cards and emails. Use of IT systems can be monitored to ensure that he is not downloading client details or other sensitive information for use after he has left.

If the employee's destination is known to you, consider writing to the new employer outlining the employee's existing contractual obligations. Although the Mainstream judgement has made it harder to prove inducement to breach, making this kind of contact will help create a stronger argument that any subsequent breach was deliberately induced because you can show that the new employer was fully aware of the scope of the employee's contractual obligations to you. Any claim of deliberate inducement – for which you may seek injunctive relief or damages or both – would be in addition to action taken against the employee for breach of contract. Unless both the employee and the new employer are targeted you may find yourself with an inadequate remedy, especially if damages are awarded against an employee who cannot afford to pay them.

Even after an employee has left you should continue to monitor their activities, the conduct of the competitor and the effect of the employee's departure on your own business in much the same way as you did during the notice period.

As soon as you become aware of any potential breach of contract, or any action designed to induce a breach, you should act as soon as possible to enforce and restrain – the courts will be more willing to grant protection the earlier you strike. But before you do anything, be certain that those post-termination restrictions are indeed enforceable in the opinion of your legal advisers.


If, on the other hand, you want to recruit a team or individual, you must now tread far more carefully or else risk ending up on the wrong end of an injunction and a claim for damages and costs.

Life has become very difficult for any company seeking to poach a whole team. It must now be able to demonstrate that it was the individual members of the team who were approached, not the team en masse, and that no conspiracy has taken place. No employee from the 'target' organisation, and in particular no team leader or senior employee, should be involved in your recruitment process. Nor, if they themselves intend to work for you, should they assist by providing the names of their team members.

If you are recruiting a team make sure that head-hunters are appointed and check that they do the following:

  • make only individual approaches,
  • make only individual offers which are not contingent upon any other team members accepting or rejecting an offer which pre-dates their own, and
  • deliver resignation letters as soon as offers have been accepted.

Looking at this from the point of view of an individual employee; it is clear that anyone who expresses uncertainty about their plans when asked a straight question by an employer will be in breach of their duty of fidelity if they are being deliberately dishonest about their intentions. Meanwhile, any company seeking to poach an individual should make clear to her that she should not provide misleading answers when her current employer asks her a direct question.

The cases we have highlighted do not alter the position that an employer seeking to rely on post-termination restrictions must be able to show that it is seeking to protect legitimate business interests, and that in so doing it is relying upon restrictions that are reasonable in duration and scope. Nonetheless, it is clear that the courts are now more willing than ever before to assist such employers and to provide injunctive relief.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.