UK: Reviewing The Governance Black Box

Last Updated: 13 December 2017
Article by Brett Simnett

The many recent governance failures show the code is not enough in isolation

In the 25 years since the foundation of the UK Corporate Governance Code – the Cadbury Report – was published, its various iterations have been lauded for boosting transparency and gaining insight into the behaviour and performance of company boards.

The code states that 'corporate governance is about what the board of a company does and how it sets the values of the company'. It also states 'the responsibilities of the board include setting the company's strategic aims, providing the leadership to put them into effect, supervising the management of the business and reporting to shareholders on their stewardship'.

The core principles of the code are leadership, effectiveness, accountability, remuneration and shareholder engagement. These principles, in their raw form, aim to encourage responsibility, ethical behaviour, measurement and communication.

As an investor there are key considerations if you are looking to invest or continue to invest in a business: considerations around whether the board is structured to fulfil its responsibilities, and how its behaviours and actions instil those same behaviours across the business.

"Corporate governance reports are not always giving us those answers or the necessary clear insight into how the business is being run"

Shareholders want to know how performance is measured and remunerated – it is important the board is communicating this effectively to them, as well as to wider stakeholders.

The answers should provide a real sense of how a board is conducting business. But the reality is corporate governance reports are not always giving us those answers or the necessary clear insight into how the business is being run.

Since the reports launch in 1992, the numerous examples of corporate governance failure must question whether we have really seen consistent good governance and true transparency, and, more importantly, why those failures were not identified and managed more effectively.

Barings Bank

In 1995, an employee of Barings Bank in Singapore, Nick Leeson, was trading futures, signing off on his own accounts and taking the bank further and further into debt, resulting in losses of £827 million.

As floor manager and department head, Leeson had free reign to settle his own trades. More importantly, there was little or no governance leadership coming from the London board. Those London directors were subsequently disqualified as being unfit to run a company.

Leeson claimed the lack of oversight and risk management from management was as much to blame as his own actions. Yet there was a lack of clarity in reporting to allow others outside the company to question the way it was operating – that questioning is essential to good governance.

MG Rover Group

MG Rover's collapse in 2005 is not a simple example of one management team's failure, but a case study of multiple owners and management teams fundamentally failing to address the core issues facing the business.

In an analysis of the company's collapse by the academic partnership Cambridge-MIT, entitled 'Who killed MG Rover?' it said: 'Its decline from the 1960s was because of a range of ignored factors: an ill-conceived product strategy, a failure to integrate various elements of the business, multiple ownership changes and a lack of capability to develop new products for key markets.'

Ultimately, the various owners of the car manufacturer – whether British Leyland Corporation, BMW, British Aerospace and finally, the Pheonix consortium – did not recognise core weaknesses in the business: weak products, poor market analysis and lack of long-term financial capital.

The owners tried to paper over the cracks rather than resolve them. The report stated: 'The main reason behind Rover's demise was an inability, which started to manifest itself 50 years ago, to manage its constituent's operations as well as its competitors were able to do so.'

After diminishing demand and a £6.5 million loan in April 2005 from the UK government, the company went into administration. This is an example of where proper checks and evaluations have systemically failed, and the question of whether the business was fit-for-purpose was never sufficiently challenged.

Financial crisis

Looking at the fundamentals of the 2007–8 financial crisis, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission concluded the crisis 'was avoidable and was caused by widespread failures in financial regulation and supervision, dramatic failures in corporate governance and risk management at many systemically important financial institutions'.

The heart of the issue was that the complexity of financial instruments had overtaken the ability of boards to govern their businesses effectively. While financial success was the norm, the need to tighten governance was either overlooked or, even worse, ignored.

"The results of 2008 were prime examples of how governance can slip when the going is good"

From Northern Rock, RBS, LBG and HBOS – to name a few firms – the results of 2008 were prime examples of how governance can slip when the going is good, and the results can be dramatic and destructive.

Again, board challenge and checks fell by the wayside. Those who should have been challenging their activities failed to act while business was good, although whether there was true transparency for stakeholders to challenge can be debated.


In 2014, the revelation Britain's biggest grocer had overstated its profits came to light. With pressures on constant financial growth, Tesco looked beyond the traditional buy-and-sell to customers, and to suppliers as a source of profit.

Dave Lewis, the newly appointed chief executive, said: 'Since 2014 we have made extensive changes across our leadership, our structures, our financial controls inside the business, and we've changed the way Tesco buys and sells'. But the damage made to supplier relationships was felt across the business and the spotlight on its behaviours is still as strong today as it was in 2014.

The question here is how did a major force in its sector lose sight of the importance of its supply chain relationships over profit, and why was the demand for short-term financial gain seen as more important than long-term, sustainable viability?

Recent history

More recent history does not fill the heart with optimism. 2016 saw Rolls-Royce's £671 million corruption case and, in 2017, we had governance issues such as Barclays' whistleblowing saga and the strategic errors at Provident Financial Group.

The code is viewed by many as a global standard, yet it failed to ensure good governance in these cases.

Insight, challenge, change, reward

The key to the success of the code is to ensure the board, shareholders and stakeholders have clear insight, and the ability to challenge and change direction. Rewards should recognise ethical and sustainable behaviour as well as financial success.

All of the examples demonstrate fundamental faults in the approach to governance and its reporting.


Firstly, there is the question of insight. This falls into two categories: the insights for the board and insights for shareholders and stakeholders.

Examples such as Barings and Tesco show that without clear channels of information from operations to the board it is impossible to drive behaviour from the top. Good governance requires clear channels of communication on how various parts of the business are performing.

This is not just financial. Viewing performance through one lens obscures the true picture. Boards need to be supported by clear communication with their operations to successfully drive culture and behaviour.

Without honest insight from across the value chain, boards cannot be effective. They must be responsible to seek and demand that information.

Secondly, if shareholders and wider stakeholders are not given clear insight into how the board is operating, communicating with the business and making decisions, how can they effectively challenge things?

"I believe better communication between management and the financial floor would have saved Barings Bank"

Governance reports that proudly tell us the board has discussed strategic, financial and risk over the year, without any clear insight into what was actually discussed and what actions came from those discussions, are deliberately being obtuse and avoiding communication with the true owners of the business.

Again, this is the responsibility of the board, but shareholders need to demand more transparent insight and actively interrogate whether financial success is driven by proper business practices.


With clear insight comes the ability to truly challenge the status quo. Boards that are communicating effectively with their businesses at operational level can look to encourage and enhance behaviours.

The recent discussions, driven by the government green paper, to encourage better employee representation at board level is an interesting concept in helping solve the problem. However, it is actually better lines of two-way communication with staff, supply chain and customers that will drive collective behavioural change.

How many of the examples covered in this article could have been avoided by better-governed communication with the people at the coal face of the business, allowing them to question and challenge?

Not only does this help a business feel as one, it creates a collective responsibility for how the business is governed and helps a board in its responsibilities.


Insight drives challenge; challenge drives change. It is a simple concept, but difficult to achieve.

Change is a word used far too flippantly in the corporate world. Change is always viewed as 'big', whereas effective change is constant development and tweaking of small elements that can have a 'big' effect.

Would better communication between management and the financial floor – and the ability for all involved to question processes – have saved Barings Bank? I believe so.

Would more effective customer and market insight have changed MG Rovers product strategy for the better? In my view, we would still see MG Rover on our roads today if there had been better collaboration across the business to drive change.

Collaboration and communication is the key to a business' ability to manage changing circumstances, avoiding 'big' issues through adaptive rather than radical change.


How a board and, just as importantly, its staff are rewarded needs to go beyond financial performance. A business' ability to adapt and change to market, economic and political forces dictates how it will continue to create value.

Key performance indicators and performance measures should look at operations and communication as well as economic indicators.

Yes, these are difficult to measure in real terms, but a successful business is one that avoids negative 'big' change. Reliability is a positive for investors and this comes from effective management and communication, so they have be a key element of remuneration measurement.

Back to the code

As a collective, we must ensure the principles of the code are lived by companies. Boards and those they are responsible for and communicate to should ask four simple questions.

  1. Does the leadership of the business have the insight, tools and communication channels to do their jobs?
  2. Is the board making effective decisions that are supported by clear insight that is transparent to its stakeholders?
  3. Do stakeholders have enough information and access to two-way dialogue to assess the performance and accountability of the board?
  4. Are remuneration targets based on long-term operations and financial viability?

When boards and stakeholders can comfortably answer these questions with an affirmative, I believe we will see the code achieve its goals.

Brett Simnett is director of investor engagement at Radley Yeldar

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions