UK: Projects & Construction Law Update - November 2017

Please find below Clyde & Co's latest projects and construction law update from November 2017


Does s. 111 of the Construction Act apply to both interim and final payment applications?

Adam Architecture Ltd v Halsbury Homes Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1735

While some may have considered this point already decided, the recent case of Adam Architecture v Halsbury Homes should leave no doubt in anyone's mind that section 111 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the Act), which deals with the requirement to pay the notified sum and the issue of pay less notices, applies to both interim and final payments. Unfortunately for Halsbury, this was not the outcome it was hoping for.

Halsbury Homes Ltd (Halsbury) engaged Adam Architecture Ltd (Adam) to provide the design work on a project to build 200 homes. The contract between Adam and Halsbury incorporated the RIBA Conditions of Appointment and the wording in relation to Payment Notices was very similar to that included in the Act.

Adam began work in relation to the project, but around six weeks it became apparent that the parties had very different views about how the services would be delivered. After this issue was raised by Adam, Halsbury instructed it to cease work and Adam subsequently invoiced Halsbury for the services it had provided to that date. Halsbury failed to issue any payment or pay less notice in response and Adam launched an adjudication claiming the entirety of its invoice. The adjudicator found in Adam's favour.

Halsbury took the matter to the TCC who refused enforcement on the basis that the contract had come to an end (i.e. Halsbury had repudiated the contract and Adam had accepted the repudiation). As the contract had been discharged, neither party was required to perform its primary obligations. This included Halsbury's obligation to serve a pay less notice under the contractual payment mechanism. Additionally, the TCC took the view that Adam's invoice represented a final account or a termination account, such that the invoiced sum was not the 'notified sum' for the purposes of the contract.

Adam appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal on the basis that even though the contract only required a pay less notice in respect of interim applications, s. 111 of the Act required it in relation to both interim and final applications. Briefly, s. 111 of the Act sets out a paying party's obligation to pay the relevant notified sum, unless it has issued a pay less notice in accordance with the section. Halsbury argued that s.111 of the Act only applied to interim payments. The Court of Appeal gave Halsbury's argument short shrift pointing to the clear wording of the Act and the line of case authority that s.111 of the Act applies to both interim and final payments. Considering the language of the Act, Jackson LJ stated that 'it seems to me clear that section 111 relates to all payments which are "provided for by a construction contract", not just interim payments. I do not think that it is permissible to read into that perfectly sensible and workable provision words which are not there'.

In relation to the repudiation point, the court also held that Adam's invoice did not amount to an acceptance of Halsbury's repudiation, meaning it could claim through the contractual provisions. As such, Adam was due the full amount of its invoice.

This judgement does not create any new law but should put beyond doubt that the payment regime of the Act applies to both interim and final payments. This of course will be welcomed by contractors as it confirms the underlying object of the Act. For employers, it emphasises the importance of being organised in respect of notices, particularly pay less notices. For guidance as to the requirements of a pay less notice, read our update below regarding the case of Muir Construction Limited v Kapital Residential Limited.

What needs to be included in those Pay Less Notices?

Muir Construction Limited v Kapital Residential Limited [2017] CSOH 132

This month appears to be the month for decisions relating to pay less notices. In this Scottish case, further guidance was provided as to what information should be included in a pay less notice. The pay less notice served simply valued the work at zero without providing evidence or supporting calculations as to how that had been reached. The court confirmed that this evidence was necessary so as to allow the reasonable recipient to understand how the relevant sum had been calculated.

Kapital Residential Limited (Kapital) engaged Muir Construction Limited (Muir) to design and build a new housing complex. A number of disputes arose and a settlement agreement was entered into. Further issues arose under the settlement agreement which resulted in Kapital issuing a pay less notice to Muir valuing the sum due at zero but giving no reasons.

The contract required any pay less notice to state the sum due and the basis on which the sum was calculated (aligning with the requirements of section 111 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the Act)). Accordingly, Muir argued the pay less notice was invalid due to the lack of supporting calculations. Kapital argued the calculations had been explained in other correspondence and the amount of detail required should depend on the circumstances of each case.

In finding for Muir, the court affirmed the general rule that any pay less notice needed to contain enough evidence to allow the reasonable recipient to work out the basis on which the sum had been calculated. It went on to state that a valid pay less notice must contain at least the grounds for withholding the sums in question and the sum applied to each of those grounds with, at a minimum, an indication of how the said sums were arrived at. Accordingly, Kapital had served an invalid pay less notice.

This decision will likely be considered persuasive by English courts as it relates to a point of general application and given the clear facts and common sense approach taken in the judgement. Employers should be careful to ensure that pay less notices are drafted to meet the requirements above.[2017]_CSOH_132.html

How well do you know your termination provisions?

Interserve Construction Limited v Hitachi Zosen Inova AG

This case is a helpful reminder of the pitfalls of misinterpreting contractual termination provisions and failing to comply with conditions precedent to termination.

Hitachi Zosen Inova AG (HZI) was the main EPC contractor on an energy from waste plant project. Interserve Construction Limited (Interserve) was engaged as one of its subcontractors. A dispute arose as to the quality of Interserve's work and delays on the project. HZI elected to terminate the contract immediately. Interserve disputed the validity of HZI's termination, arguing it was required to give Interserve a 7 day cure period.

The relevant provisions in question were clause 43.1 and clause 43.1A. Clause 43.1 set out the applicable termination events and, subject to clause 43.1A, gave HZI the right to terminate 'forthwith by notice'. Clause 43.1A stated:

"In the case of a default by the Contractor under heads (h), (p) or (q) of Sub-Clause 43.1, the Purchaser may (at its absolute discretion) notify the Contractor of the default and if the Contractor fails to commence and diligently pursue the rectification of the default within a period of seven (7) Days after receipt of notification, the Purchaser may by notice terminate the employment of the Contractor..."

Interserve argued that because HZI was relying on termination events (h) and (q), the provision of a 7 day cure period was a condition precedent to HZI being able to terminate the contract. HZI disputed this arguing that the 7 days' notice was at its 'absolute discretion' and could not be a condition precedent for termination.

In deciding the dispute, Jefford J considered the relevant principles for construing the provisions to be to look for the objective meaning of the contractual language, in the context of the contract as a whole, giving more or less weight to the context depending on the nature, formality and quality of the drafting and, if there are rival interpretations, reach a view that is most consistent with business common sense. Applying this, she held that Interserve's interpretation was correct. If HZI had intended to terminate under one of the default options that clause 43.1A applied to, it had to serve a notice in accordance with that clause.

An important part of her reasoning was that the wording which made clause 43.1A conditional for certain default options would have no meaning if it did not have to be complied with by HZI when it sought to terminate. HZI used the same rational to argue that the words 'absolute discretion' would have no meaning if they did not mean it could decide whether to give notice or not. This was rejected on the basis that, elsewhere in the contract, the words 'absolute discretion' simply emphasised that whether to do something or not was HZI's choice not obligation and, in some cases, expressly clarified that HZI's acts would not have any adverse consequences such as the waiver of rights.

Accordingly, Jefford J held that the words 'absolute discretion' simply emphasised that 'whether to give such a notice and commence the termination process is a matter for HZI and that failure to do so will not have adverse consequences, such as an argument that the absence of a notice evidences the absence of default or the waiver of its right to rely on the default'.

The declaration sought by Interserve that notice was a condition precedent to HZI's right to terminate was granted.

This case is a useful reminder for parties who are considering exercising their termination rights to carefully review the requirements of the contract in question. The consequences of invalidly terminating a contract are significant, as doing so will constitute repudiatory conduct, entitling the other side to terminate instead and claim damages. Where provisions are unclear, the courts will take an iterative approach to construing the provisions, placing more weight on the literal meaning of the words, then considering these in terms of context and commercial common sense. A cautious approach to termination should always be adopted.


Release of the 2017 FIDIC Books

FIDIC users will be waiting with baited breath this morning to get their hands on copies of the 2017 editions of the Yellow, Red and Silver Books. The Books are being released today at the FIDIC International Contracts Users' Conference.

Today, FIDIC is releasing the much anticipated 2017 versions of the Yellow, Red and Silver Books at its annual International Contracts Users' Conference. Members of the Clyde & Co Projects and Construction team are attending the conference and will shortly be releasing an update summarising the key changes to the Yellow Book.

Anthony Albertini and David Brown, partners in our London and Paris offices respectively, together with Driver Trett, will be delivering the workshop on Advanced Dispute Resolution Techniques on the fourth day of the Conference.

Following the release of the new Books, Clyde & Co will be offering bespoke training to clients eager to get up to speed on the changes and to see how these will impact their businesses. Training sessions will be available from mid-January 2018. Watch this space!

Autumn budget

Phillip Hammond delivered the Autumn budget this month, with a number of positive announcements for the construction industry.

On 22 November 2017, the Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, delivered the Autumn 2017 budget, the first since the general election earlier this year.

He announced an increase in the National Productivity Investment Fund (NPIF) from £23 billion to £31 billion, to support innovation, upgrade the UK's infrastructure and underpin the government's modern Industrial Strategy

Mr Hammond recognised the skills shortage in the construction industry and announced that, to address this, the National Retaining Partnership will oversee certain short-term action and there will be money to train a workforce to build new homes. Mr Hammond stated that the government would provide £34 million to scale up innovative training models across the country. He also announced that the government will invest £30 million to test the use of AI and innovative EdTech in online digital skills courses.


Liz Jenkins, Partner, featured in multiple publications this month, commenting on alternatives to PFI and the Autumn Budget. To read Liz's insights into the PFI market, click here.

To read her comments on the Autumn Budget, click here.

We note that access to these materials may require a subscription.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions