UK: Litigation Procedure: A Round-Up For Construction In-House Lawyers

Last Updated: 30 November 2017
Article by Akin Akinbode, Gurbinder Grewal and Rachael Herbert

Our pick of recent news and decisions on litigation and alternative dispute resolution procedures for construction claims.

If you would like more information on any of the topics below,

Proposals for new disclosure rules in the offing

The changes made to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) back in 2013 introduced a new menu of disclosure options to make the process more efficient and ensure that costs are kept proportionate to the value of the claim.

However, despite a disclosure menu, the introduction of electronic disclosure procedures and advances in supporting technology that allow a much quicker sifting of documents, most parties still opt for the traditional "everything but the kitchen sink" approach. "Standard disclosure" remains the default choice for most a process that obliges parties to make a reasonable search for and disclose all documents that adversely support or affect both its own and the other's case.

In reality, the current disclosure regime is based on and more applicable to paper and not e-documents. It is simply not fit for the deluge of electronic data that most litigating parties face – particularly in the type of complex, document-heavy, claims dealt with by the Technology and Construction Court.

In 2016, Sir Terence Etherton, a former Chancellor of the High Court, set up a working party to address the widespread concerns about the perceived excessive costs, scale and complexity of disclosure. Recognising that disclosure is a key procedural stage for most evidence-based claims, Sir Terence said:

"It is imperative that our disclosure system is, and is seen to be, highly efficient and flexible, reflecting developments in technology. Having effective and proportionate rules for disclosure is a key attraction of English law and English dispute resolution in international markets."

The working party, chaired by Lady Justice Gloster, has now published a draft Practice Direction which, once in force, is intended to effect a "wholesale cultural change" including a digital approach to disclosure, a change in lawyers' attitudes to disclosure and a shift in the judiciary to more proactive case management.

The proposed disclosure scheme, set out in the draft Practice Direction and a draft "Disclosure Review Document" (DRD), will be tested in a two-year pilot currently planned to start in early spring 2018. This pilot will be mandatory: there will be no "opt in" approach as we've seen on some other procedural changes.

Advisory note for claims in the Business and Property Courts

The Business and Property Courts (B&PCs), which include the Technology and Construction Court, came into operation on 2 October 2017. An updated version of the B&PCs' Advisory Note was published on 13 October 2017 and included a draft of the B&PCs Practice Direction. The note deals with, for example, the opening of new B&PCs in Newcastle and Liverpool, electronic filing, the types of cases that can be heard in each court, as well as practical details such as what titles to give cases issued after 2 October 2017. Further updates are expected. (Click here to read the Advisory Note.)

A separate guidance note relating to court orders and their production was issued at the beginning of November for application in the B&PCs in Leeds only.

Proposals for fixed costs for lower-value claims in the multi-track

As part of his 2010 Review of Civil Litigation Costs, Lord Justice Jackson introduced fixed recoverable costs (FRC) in "fast track" cases (for claims of up to £25,000) and "costs budgeting" for multi-track cases. Having waited for those reforms to "bed in", he published his latest report on FRC on 31 July 2017, in which he develops proposals to extend FRC to lower-value claims in the multi-track.

The aim in preparing this report was to analyse the ways in which costs recovery could be made more proportionate and thereby promote access to justice. The first paragraphs of the report set out the background succinctly:

"In England and Wales, the winning party in litigation is entitled to recover costs from the losing party. The traditional approach has been that the winner adds up its costs at the end and then claims back as much as it can from the loser. That is a recipe for runaway costs. The only way to control costs effectively is to do so in advance: that is before the parties have run up excessive bills. There are two ways of doing that:

(i) a general scheme of fixed recoverable costs (FRC);

(ii) imposing a budget for each individual case (costs budgeting)."

The views of a diverse set of interested parties were collated and the proposals include:

  • a grid of FRC for all fast track cases (chapter 5);
  • a new "intermediate" track with streamlined procedures for certain claims up to £100,000 (triable in three days or less with no more than two expert witnesses on each side) (chapter 7); and
  • a voluntary pilot (with SMEs in mind) of a "capped costs " regime for commercial cases in B&PCs up to £250,000 with streamlined procedures and capped recoverable costs up to £80,000 (chapter 9). The trial, which should last no more than two days, should be held within eight months of the Case Management Conference.

At the heart of the review is the objective of promoting access to justice. "Controlling litigation costs (while ensuring proper remuneration for lawyers) is a way of promoting access to justice. If the costs are too high, people cannot afford lawyers; if the costs are too low, there will not be any lawyers doing the work."

Successful litigating parties should not lose sight of the fact that fixed recoverable costs in litigation proceedings will almost always be lower than the actual cost of legal fees incurred. Recovering fixed costs from the other party will still, again in almost all cases, leave the successful party liable to pay the balance of fees to its legal team.

The report is being reviewed by the Master of the Rolls, the Lord Chief Justice and the government and further consultation is expected before the implementation. (Click here to read the report in full: Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Supplemental Report – Fixed Recoverable Costs.)

Counsel's unavailability is not a good reason to delay hearings

In a recent group action case, Mr Justice Fraser refused to take account of counsel's availability when fixing hearings in the proceedings. He even took the unusual step of issuing a written judgment with reasons on the basis the issue was likely to arise again.

Acknowledging that counsel of high repute "are extremely valuable in the marketplace and have many potential clients", the judge also recognised that senior counsel "all work extremely hard and it is a function of the independent Bar that they will usually have multiple cases underway simultaneously". While it was regrettable for one party to be deprived of its counsel of choice because of the date of the listing, it was not unusual. Provided reasonable notice is given, a replacement could be found.

Fixing court hearings around the diaries of busy counsel, rather than their fixing their diaries around the case, was a fundamentally wrong approach. When carrying out their case management functions, the courts cannot park a case indefinitely while the parties or their lawyers attend to other matters. Such an approach would lead to unacceptable delay and additional costs: delaying hearings must be avoided. Hearings would be fixed well in advance so that counsel would know when they were taking place and plan accordingly.

While this was not a construction case, the clash of court/counsel diaries is an issue that can affect complex, high-value cases such as those found in the Technology and Construction Court. Parties who instruct busy Queen's Counsel (QCs), and even senior juniors, should be aware that their unavailability for hearings or the trial is unlikely to be a good reason to delay the listing.

(Bates & Ors v. Post Office Ltd [2017] EWHC 2844 (QB))

Litigating parties' behaviour must be cost-effective, efficient and in accordance with the overriding objective

In Bates, the judge rounded off his judgment with a costs warning. He listed both parties' procedural failures in the case, which included: "failing to respond to proposed directions for two months; failing even to consider e-disclosure questionnaires; failing to lodge required documents with the court; failing to lodge documents in good time; refusing to disclose obviously relevant documents; resisting any extension to the 'cut-off' date for entries of new claimants on the Group Register; and threatening pointless interlocutory skirmishes".

In clear disapproval of the parties' conduct in the proceedings, the judge said:

"Such behaviour simply does not begin to qualify as either cost-effective, efficient, or being in accordance with the overriding objective. A fundamental change of attitude by the legal advisers involved in this group litigation is required. A failure to heed this warning will result in draconian costs orders."

Bates is further evidence of judicial robustness when enforcing the court's overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and at proportionate cost (under Civil Procedure Rule, Part 1). The judge reminded the parties that they have a duty to help the court to further the overriding objective and must co-operate between themselves, be constructive and conduct the case efficiently.

House of Lords review judicial appointments

The House of Lords Constitution Committee has issued a follow-up report on judicial appointments. As well as requesting "resolute and unflinching" support from the Lord Chancellor in defending the judiciary from personal attacks, the Lords considered:

  • why it is difficult to retain and recruit judges, including: the difference between public and private sector pay; poor morale following the dispute about their pensions; the dilapidated state of the court buildings and the support functions; the retirement age; and the issue of judges returning to private practice;
  • recruitment issues and how to ensure a steady stream of applications without lowering the high standard; and
  • following limited improvement in the diversity of the judiciary, how to make high-level judicial posts open to a wider pool of applicants and the need for pre-application training.

To read the Select Committee on the Constitution, Judicial Appointments: follow-up, (7th Report of Session 2017-19, published 2 November 2017, HL Paper 32), click here.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
22 Jan 2019, Other, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

The second event in the Dentons «Women LEAD» (Leadership, Entrepreneurism, Advancement, Development) series in Luxembourg will take place on January 22, 2019.

22 Jan 2019, Briefing, London, UK

The UK government has pledged to deepen economic and trade ties with growing African economies ahead of Brexit, with a desire to overtake the US to become the G7's biggest investor in Africa by 2022.

25 Jan 2019, Other, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Dentons’ Debates ask one basic question: What role can law firms, lawyers, and the private sector in general, play in promoting social change?

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions