UK: Poetic Justice For Enthusiastic Copyright Claim

Last Updated: 28 November 2017
Article by Paul Harris

A dispute over a Dylan Thomas photograph shows the perils of accessible litigation

Dylan Thomas might well have appreciated the irony of a cropped version of his wedding photograph in 1947 being used to advertise Welsh holiday cottages. 'Wales: The land of my fathers,' the poet once said. 'My fathers can have it!'

The use of said photo was the subject matter of an action in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC). The copyright case, Pablo Star Media Ltd v Bowen [2017] EWHC 2451, resulted in defeat for the claimant but was then appealed.

It is not, however, the specific issues that are of interest here, but rather the question about everyone having their say in court – and the cost to the public purse in them doing so.

Spanish connection

There seems to be a lot of anger in the way that the claimant, represented by Pablo Star director and sole shareholder, Haydn Price, handled this case. Most would regard the matter as resolved, given the infringing acts ceased within 17 days of the letter before action being sent.

It might have been better if Richard Bowen, the respondent, had offered proper undertakings, but most IP lawyers would have advised claimants not to pursue this any further, not least because the amount of damage was minimal.

Instead of considering what he had achieved as a success in its own right and so moving on, Price brought proceedings in IPEC seeking damages.

A key issue was whether it was reasonable for Bowen to have assumed that copyright in the photograph had expired.

Bowen had taken the photograph from VisitWales.com. The copyright had expired in the UK, but because the copyright in Spain was still subsisting in 1995 (a point requiring expert testimony) the EU directive extending copyright protection meant that it was brought back to life through the entire EU, including the UK.

"Most IP lawyers would have advised claimants not to pursue this any further, not least because the amount of damage was minimal"

Following a trial and judgment, Price was awarded £250 (with £3 of interest) on the 'user principle' – that this is the sum that a willing licensee and licensor would have agreed upon.

However, this amount was reduced to £88.90 because the deputy judge who heard the case thought that Price's behaviour made it appropriate to award Bowen his costs, essentially for travel to attend trial and represent himself.

This arose because Price had also brought proceedings in Ireland against Bowen and threatened to do so in the US, pointing out that Bowen was at risk for $150,000 of damages in that territory. All this was due to the same photograph on the same website being accessible in those countries.

Price did not consider that justice had been done and appealed the decision, which came before judge Richard Hacon, the IPEC's main judge, sitting in the High Court.

Principled abstention

Price's argument broke into several basic parts. First, the user principle was not the appropriate test given the number of breaches that occurred during the relevant period, which would have included cropping the photo, storage and use.

Second, the breaches were flagrant and this was not properly taken into consideration. Third, costs should have been awarded to Price, not to Bowen. Lastly, taking into account his other actions in other jurisdictions was inappropriate.

As an appeals court, judge Hacon focused on the role such a court plays in reviewing the decisions of lower courts.

He referred to a number of well-known decisions, the important one being the REEF Trade Mark Court of Appeal decision, which specifically looked at how a High Court judge should approach an appeal from a lower tribunal – in that case the Trade Marks Registry.

Hacon then reiterated the principles to be followed, which reduce to the higher court not interfering with the lower court's decision unless there is a manifest error in the approach or the law.

Where the decision has been given by a specialised judge and in a specialised tribunal, such as the IPEC, the appeals court is even more reluctant to interfere.

The judge considered the issue of compensatory damages and the user principle, and particularly whether the acts of infringement merited anything different. He concluded not, since the aim was to consider the compensatory amount as a whole, and the user principle as applied by the deputy judge did just that.

Discretionary costs

Next, the judge considered the issue of additional damages for flagrancy of the infringing acts. As referred to above, it took an expert to assist the deputy judge to arrive at the conclusion that copyright was still subsisting in Spain, and so the UK.

The deputy judge considered it was reasonable for Bowen to have assumed copyright had expired given the date the photograph was taken.

However, in the appeal Bowen advanced a different argument, without any supporting documentation, acknowledging that he knew copyright subsisted as the VisitWales website used a copyright notice stating that it owned copyright – although that would have been for the entire website.

"As the judge also pointed out, costs are always in the discretion of the judge hearing the case"

Bowen stated he had frequently used material off this website for his own, and notified VisitWales when he had done so. This time he failed to notify the website. Hacon was doubtful of this, but did not consider the deputy judge had erred in not awarding additional damages.

Finally, there was the issue of costs. By all accounts, this took up some time at the appeal hearing, which manifested itself in the number of pages devoted to it in the appeal judgment.

Taking account of the threatened US proceedings, and that there were numerous pieces of litigation in Ireland and the US (involving Welsh ministers who were the legal entities behind VisitWales, as well as a number of newspapers), the judge concluded that Price's behaviour was unacceptable.

In all the circumstances, there might have been the possibility of a breach of the overriding objective in respect of court proceedings if the deputy judge had awarded costs in Price's favour. As the judge also pointed out, costs are always in the discretion of the judge hearing the case.

Trawling for gold

The judge described Price as an 'enthusiastic litigator', citing the claimant's willingness to bring litigation against Bowen in the US 'absent a deal on terms satisfactory' to him.

Should this case have been allowed to get even this far? No, particularly when the sum in issue has been found to be minimal when compared to the overall cost to the public purse to have two judges hear this matter.

This becomes clearer when it is appreciated that Price needed to persuade a High Court judge to allow him to put a company he dissolved back on to the register to assign the photograph to himself.

He had not done so before the company dissolved, so the assets become the government's under the 'bona vacantia' or ownerless goods rule.

This also was after proceedings against Bowen had commenced. I doubt the companies judge would have so readily agreed to do so if he had been aware of how Price behaved.

This case highlights litigating is no longer only for the rich and companies that can afford it, despite the hike in court fees.

In itself this is a good thing. However, it seems that the IPEC has become the playground of the determined litigant in person (which Price effectively was) taking up valuable court time and public resources for their own personal crusade.

Giving the court more effective case management powers to bring such proceedings to a halt and at a relatively early stage in proceedings must now be considered to prevent cases like this getting out of hand.

If not, the IPEC may well be shunned by those it was intended to help: small and medium businesses who could not otherwise afford to litigate in the High Court.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions