UK: War Reduced Damages For Wrongful Early Redelivery

Last Updated: 14 August 2008
Article by Richard Mabane

Fairness at the expense of certainty? Richard Mabane discusses the House of Lords' decision in the Golden Victory

Damages due from charterers for wrongful early redelivery were payable only up to the point where, after the outbreak of the Gulf War in March 2003, the charter would have been cancelled pursuant to an express War Clause, according to the finding of the House of Lords in a judgment of March 28.

On December 14, 2001, the 300,000 dwt crude oil tanker Golden Victory was redelivered three years into a seven-year charter on the Shelltime 4 form.

In London arbitration, the arbitrator found that damages were payable for wrongful redelivery, but only up to the outbreak of the Gulf War, when (he found) the charterers would have cancelled.

After unsuccessful appeals by the owners at first instance and in the Court of Appeal, the matter came before the House of Lords in January 2007.

The owners argued for strict application of what has been called the "breach date" or "available market" rule (The Elena d'Amico [1980] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 75; the Wave [1981] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 521).

That approach requires that, provided there was — at, or shortly after, termination — an "available market" for what has been lost as a result of the breach, the resulting claim is calculated by reference to the price which can be obtained for it in that market at that time. This reflects the expectation that the innocent party, acting reasonably, will promptly go out into the market to mitigate its loss, in the case of early re-delivery by obtaining a substitute fixture on substantially the same terms as that which has been lost.

On this basis, the owners argued, no attention should be paid to later events unless inevitable or "pre-destined" at the time of termination.

This approach, they said, had the advantages of certainty and predictability — qualities long prized in English law — and also finality, in as much as the parties could ascertain the amount of the claim at an early stage, which, in turn, could only promote an early settlement.

The charterers, whilst accepting that the measure of loss (here, the applicable substitute hire rate) crystallised around the time of termination, argued that the position was not, at that stage, final as to the period for which damages could be claimed. The court, they said, could in respect of that issue have regard to subsequent events occurring between termination and the assessment of damages. This, they asserted, was in keeping with the "compensatory principle", whereby damages are aimed (insofar as possible by monetary payment) at putting the innocent party in the position it would have been in had the contract been performed.

The majority (Lords Carswell, Scott and Brown) favoured the charterers' approach as giving full effect to the compensatory principle which, they held, should in these circumstances prevail over any competing criteria of certainty, predictability and finality.

Whilst recognising that the final assessment could be deliberately delayed in some cases, they pointed to the existence of means to prevent this.

In a strong dissenting judgment, Lord Bingham (Lord Walker also dissenting) referred to the fact that contracts were made to be performed and that, if the charterers had promptly honoured their secondary obligation to pay damages, they would have done so without any reduction based on the later Gulf War.

The owners, he said, were entitled to be compensated for the value of what they had lost at the time it had been lost, and there was no clear authority for the charterers' approach in the context of commercial contracts such as charterparties (as opposed to other areas of law, such as claims in tort for personal injury).

On one view, the value of the contractual rights lost by the owners can be seen as properly valued at the time of termination and entirely unaffected by the War Clause. Had the vessel been sold with the charter attached to it shortly before termination, the commercial value of the charter would most likely have been calculated on the basis of it being performed in full — reflecting the fact that war between either the UK or the US and Iraq was by no means considered likely.

There is also a strong undercurrent in English law which (for good commercial reasons) encourages certainty, predictability and finality, and being able promptly to calculate the amount of the claim can only facilitate early settlement.

However, as Lord Mance had stated in the Court of Appeal, the charter always had inherent in it the uncertainty involved in the War Clause, and that was part of the package of contractual rights which the owners had lost.

The uncertainty of future events is also well established in English law as a means of reducing damages for the future, for example where damages assessed by way of a percentage for "loss of chance". On that basis, even the breach date approach need not ignore the effect of future events on the value of the contract.

Nor are damages necessarily always based on the position at, or very shortly after, termination: indeed, the owners here had argued (despite asserting an "available market") for a market rate calculated at a date several months after termination, claiming for the intervening period damages based on spot market rates.

It is also not unusual for the quantification of damages to be deferred, where appropriate, to achieve an accurate and fair result, as indeed happened here for an additional claim by the owners for loss of a share of profits, which the charter provided would be payable where the market rate for the vessel went above a certain base figure.

Nor does the approach adopted by the majority necessarily favour the party in breach, and the "breach date" rule can itself be harsh in its results. In this case, for example, had war seemed probable at the time of termination, damages assessed on that basis at that time might have been reduced to reflect the risk, only for war to have been averted at the last moment. Would that still have been the right approach if damages had been assessed after the threat of war had abated?

It is also (rightly or wrongly) the approach of the English courts to favour the defendant in certain related circumstances, as for example in assuming, where there would have been optional modes of post-termination performance, that the method most favourable to the defendant would have been adopted (however unlikely), reducing the resultant claim accordingly (The World Navigator [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 23 (C.A.)).

While achieving certainty, that is a controversial area of English law, and in this scenario, provided the necessary event has occurred by the time damages are assessed, exercise of the option to cancel might well be presumed in favour of the defendant.

Many will consider that an unfair result, but even proof on a "balance of probabilities" (which it appears may have been the approach of the arbitrator here) could be harsh in its results. For example, an innocent claimant might be deprived of further damages simply because the party in breach had demonstrated a 51% chance that it would have cancelled.

On the other hand, the comments of the majority (in particular, Lord Brown) in respect of possible events after the assessment of damages point towards a "loss of chance" approach permitting a percentage reduction to reflect any more than speculative chance of a future event happening.

Some may see this as creating a field day for defendants, since there may be many future events with a real chance of occurring over the course of a long-term contract.

Indeed, the difficulties at the heart of the case are likely to be most acute in relation to long-term contracts terminated at an early stage. In particular, the temptation to delay the assessment of damages is likely to be greater; and, whilst the majority specifically approved the "date of breach" rule as a means of ascertaining the market rate to apply in calculating damages, it would be a natural extension of their approach to take account of market movements since termination, for example in so far as these have benefited the innocent party because it did not mitigate by seeking a substitute contract on similar terms, such as where an owner has chartered out on a (rising) spot market rather than concluding another long-term charter before the market rose.

There may also be issues as to whether an "available market" exists for long-term contracts. Some commentators, indeed, may not recognise the existence of such a market for seven-year charters, often negotiated months in advance and linked to the owners' financing arrangements.

Whatever the position may be, this latest judgment still leaves much uncertainty in an important area of the law, and doubtless there will be strong views in the shipping industry as to whether the majority of the Law Lords got it right.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.