UK: War Reduced Damages For Wrongful Early Redelivery

Last Updated: 14 August 2008
Article by Richard Mabane

Fairness at the expense of certainty? Richard Mabane discusses the House of Lords' decision in the Golden Victory

Damages due from charterers for wrongful early redelivery were payable only up to the point where, after the outbreak of the Gulf War in March 2003, the charter would have been cancelled pursuant to an express War Clause, according to the finding of the House of Lords in a judgment of March 28.

On December 14, 2001, the 300,000 dwt crude oil tanker Golden Victory was redelivered three years into a seven-year charter on the Shelltime 4 form.

In London arbitration, the arbitrator found that damages were payable for wrongful redelivery, but only up to the outbreak of the Gulf War, when (he found) the charterers would have cancelled.

After unsuccessful appeals by the owners at first instance and in the Court of Appeal, the matter came before the House of Lords in January 2007.

The owners argued for strict application of what has been called the "breach date" or "available market" rule (The Elena d'Amico [1980] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 75; the Wave [1981] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 521).

That approach requires that, provided there was — at, or shortly after, termination — an "available market" for what has been lost as a result of the breach, the resulting claim is calculated by reference to the price which can be obtained for it in that market at that time. This reflects the expectation that the innocent party, acting reasonably, will promptly go out into the market to mitigate its loss, in the case of early re-delivery by obtaining a substitute fixture on substantially the same terms as that which has been lost.

On this basis, the owners argued, no attention should be paid to later events unless inevitable or "pre-destined" at the time of termination.

This approach, they said, had the advantages of certainty and predictability — qualities long prized in English law — and also finality, in as much as the parties could ascertain the amount of the claim at an early stage, which, in turn, could only promote an early settlement.

The charterers, whilst accepting that the measure of loss (here, the applicable substitute hire rate) crystallised around the time of termination, argued that the position was not, at that stage, final as to the period for which damages could be claimed. The court, they said, could in respect of that issue have regard to subsequent events occurring between termination and the assessment of damages. This, they asserted, was in keeping with the "compensatory principle", whereby damages are aimed (insofar as possible by monetary payment) at putting the innocent party in the position it would have been in had the contract been performed.

The majority (Lords Carswell, Scott and Brown) favoured the charterers' approach as giving full effect to the compensatory principle which, they held, should in these circumstances prevail over any competing criteria of certainty, predictability and finality.

Whilst recognising that the final assessment could be deliberately delayed in some cases, they pointed to the existence of means to prevent this.

In a strong dissenting judgment, Lord Bingham (Lord Walker also dissenting) referred to the fact that contracts were made to be performed and that, if the charterers had promptly honoured their secondary obligation to pay damages, they would have done so without any reduction based on the later Gulf War.

The owners, he said, were entitled to be compensated for the value of what they had lost at the time it had been lost, and there was no clear authority for the charterers' approach in the context of commercial contracts such as charterparties (as opposed to other areas of law, such as claims in tort for personal injury).

On one view, the value of the contractual rights lost by the owners can be seen as properly valued at the time of termination and entirely unaffected by the War Clause. Had the vessel been sold with the charter attached to it shortly before termination, the commercial value of the charter would most likely have been calculated on the basis of it being performed in full — reflecting the fact that war between either the UK or the US and Iraq was by no means considered likely.

There is also a strong undercurrent in English law which (for good commercial reasons) encourages certainty, predictability and finality, and being able promptly to calculate the amount of the claim can only facilitate early settlement.

However, as Lord Mance had stated in the Court of Appeal, the charter always had inherent in it the uncertainty involved in the War Clause, and that was part of the package of contractual rights which the owners had lost.

The uncertainty of future events is also well established in English law as a means of reducing damages for the future, for example where damages assessed by way of a percentage for "loss of chance". On that basis, even the breach date approach need not ignore the effect of future events on the value of the contract.

Nor are damages necessarily always based on the position at, or very shortly after, termination: indeed, the owners here had argued (despite asserting an "available market") for a market rate calculated at a date several months after termination, claiming for the intervening period damages based on spot market rates.

It is also not unusual for the quantification of damages to be deferred, where appropriate, to achieve an accurate and fair result, as indeed happened here for an additional claim by the owners for loss of a share of profits, which the charter provided would be payable where the market rate for the vessel went above a certain base figure.

Nor does the approach adopted by the majority necessarily favour the party in breach, and the "breach date" rule can itself be harsh in its results. In this case, for example, had war seemed probable at the time of termination, damages assessed on that basis at that time might have been reduced to reflect the risk, only for war to have been averted at the last moment. Would that still have been the right approach if damages had been assessed after the threat of war had abated?

It is also (rightly or wrongly) the approach of the English courts to favour the defendant in certain related circumstances, as for example in assuming, where there would have been optional modes of post-termination performance, that the method most favourable to the defendant would have been adopted (however unlikely), reducing the resultant claim accordingly (The World Navigator [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 23 (C.A.)).

While achieving certainty, that is a controversial area of English law, and in this scenario, provided the necessary event has occurred by the time damages are assessed, exercise of the option to cancel might well be presumed in favour of the defendant.

Many will consider that an unfair result, but even proof on a "balance of probabilities" (which it appears may have been the approach of the arbitrator here) could be harsh in its results. For example, an innocent claimant might be deprived of further damages simply because the party in breach had demonstrated a 51% chance that it would have cancelled.

On the other hand, the comments of the majority (in particular, Lord Brown) in respect of possible events after the assessment of damages point towards a "loss of chance" approach permitting a percentage reduction to reflect any more than speculative chance of a future event happening.

Some may see this as creating a field day for defendants, since there may be many future events with a real chance of occurring over the course of a long-term contract.

Indeed, the difficulties at the heart of the case are likely to be most acute in relation to long-term contracts terminated at an early stage. In particular, the temptation to delay the assessment of damages is likely to be greater; and, whilst the majority specifically approved the "date of breach" rule as a means of ascertaining the market rate to apply in calculating damages, it would be a natural extension of their approach to take account of market movements since termination, for example in so far as these have benefited the innocent party because it did not mitigate by seeking a substitute contract on similar terms, such as where an owner has chartered out on a (rising) spot market rather than concluding another long-term charter before the market rose.

There may also be issues as to whether an "available market" exists for long-term contracts. Some commentators, indeed, may not recognise the existence of such a market for seven-year charters, often negotiated months in advance and linked to the owners' financing arrangements.

Whatever the position may be, this latest judgment still leaves much uncertainty in an important area of the law, and doubtless there will be strong views in the shipping industry as to whether the majority of the Law Lords got it right.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions