UK: Court Of Appeal Holds That Banks Do Not Owe A Duty Of Care In IRHP Redress Scheme

Last Updated: 8 November 2017
Article by Laura Cooke and Laura Chicken

Most Read Contributor in UK, December 2017

In spring 2016, we examined the range of interest rate hedging product ("IRHP") misselling claims that were working their way through the courts following on from the redress scheme agreed between the banks and the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"). In this update, we revisit this IHRP litigation following a recent decision by the Court of Appeal around whether a duty of care is owed by those operating such a redress scheme. Had the claimants been successful in their arguments, it would have allowed them to re-open their claims against financial institutions, despite the fact that the underlying allegations of negligence were statute barred.


In 2012, nine banks agreed to review their sales of IRHPs made to non-sophisticated customers since 2001. Once affected customers had been identified, their participation in the redress scheme depended on the type of product purchased. Those who had purchased structured collars were automatically included within the redress scheme, whereas those who had purchased cap products had to have proactively complained to their banks to be included. Purchasers of all other types of IRHPs would be invited to optin if assessed as non-sophisticated.

By the end of 2015, the redress scheme appeared to have been a success on paper with 92% of offers having been accepted, but this was only half the story. Some customers were aggrieved as they were left with little choice but to participate in the redress scheme as their legal claims would have been time-barred or they were not eligible to go to FOS given their size and others complained that the compensation was inadequate, or they were offered alternative hedging products instead, or otherwise excluded from the process on technicalities. A number of claims against the banks then followed by those dissatisfied by the redress received with claimants deploying various arguments, including that the banks owed them a duty of care in conducting the redress scheme.

Claimants in such actions had something of a bumpy ride, with some finding a way through and others meeting a dead end. There were also some potentially conflicting decisions with the High Court in Suremime Limited v Barclays Bank plc (2015) granting permission to amend the Particulars of Claim to plead that the defendant bank directly owed its customers a common law duty of care in connection with the conduct of the redress scheme. However, the Court in CGL Group Limited v Royal Bank of Scotland (2016) held that a similar proposed amendment was not arguable.

Court of Appeal judgment

Three linked appeals came before the Court of Appeal in June 20171 , one of which was the CGL Group appeal. The principal issue to be decided was whether reviews, conducted pursuant to an agreement between the banks and the FCA as part of a settlement to avoid enforcement proceedings by the FCA, which considered that there had been "serious failings" in the way the banks sold these products to small and medium sized businesses, gave rise to a duty of care by the banks to those businesses to carry out those reviews with reasonable care and skill.

Lord Justice Beatson gave the leading judgment, dismissing the appeals.

While Beatson LJ acknowledged that the difficulties of determining when a duty of care arises are well known, there are three general tests to be considered in the round:

(1) whether the defendant assumed responsibility to the claimant; (2) the threefold test in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman (1990) (reasonable foreseeability, proximate relationship and fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty); and (3) whether the addition to existing categories of duty would be incremental rather than indefinable.

The appellants' primary case was that the banks owed them a duty of care because they had "voluntarily" assumed responsibility to them in carrying out the redress scheme by virtue of writing to the customer inviting them to opt-in. Beatson LJ thought the appellants had focussed too heavily on the assumption of responsibility test and that it was not the most appropriate one in this case.

Beatson LJ considered that the regulatory context clearly weighed against the imposition of a duty of care in these cases, stating that it would be "unusual for the common law to impose a common law duty on a statutory regulatory framework". He noted that parliament had already decided that some breaches of the banks' regulatory duties are not to be actionable at all by customers, and others are only to be actionable by private persons. Here, the appellants did not have rights of action under s138D of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ("FSMA") to seek damages for losses arising from breach of rules. Consequently the recognition of a common law duty of care to the appellants would be "to drive a coach and horses through the intention of Parliament" and would "undermine a regulatory scheme which has carefully identified which class of customers are to have remedies for which kind of breach". It was clear that Beatson LJ placed much weight on what parliament intended, namely that the FCA was to have broad powers, including the ability to require restitution under s384 or a scheme under s404 FSMA, and that no individual customer could enforce these powers or sue for breach as it would be for the FCA to bring enforcement proceedings. Although the banks and FCA had come to a contractual arrangement to carry out the review, he considered that the review was "in practical terms thrust on them by the FCA rather than truly voluntary" and this pointed against recognising a duty of care.

The fact that the review and redress process was also scrutinised by an independent reviewer (a 'skilled person' appointed under s166 FSMA) also appears to have been a factor relevant to the determination of whether a duty arose. Beatson LJ considered that the banks could not have "assumed responsibility" when they expressly informed customers that an independent reviewer would be examining the decisions. Though the point did not arise, he also commented that the independent reviewer could not have owed a duty of care to the customers either.

Beatson LJ also appeared to be concerned about the broader implications had the appeals been allowed. He noted that the complaint concerned not the provision of banking services, but the way in which complaints about banking services were handled. He considered it was possible to imagine a number of similar customer complaint schemes such that the imposition of a duty of care in respect of a complaint system could have " far-reaching consequences".

Interestingly, Beatson LJ also referenced (or rather downplayed) the Suremime v Barclays decision, noting that the judge had permitted the amendment to the Particulars of Claim whilst expressly stating that he could not be confident that all the relevant facts had been deployed which would be relevant to determining whether a duty of care arose. It appears that the parties in Suremime may have settled before a substantive hearing of the facts took place.


The decision will have come as a welcome relief to financial institutions that had been engaged in such IRHP reviews. However, it does raise the question as to whether banks will be keen to agree to schemes outside of s404 in order to avoid owing a duty of care or otherwise being caught by actionable provisions of FSMA.

It also continues in the same direction as the April 2017 decision in Mazarona Properties Ltd v Financial Ombudsman Service (2017), where the High Court rejected an application for judicial review of a decision taken by a FOS ombudsman when faced with a complaint about a redress offer made (and later withdrawn) following the alleged misselling of IHRPs by a bank. The FOS decided that it could not hear the complaint as the bank's review process fell outside the scope of its compulsory jurisdiction. The High Court agreed, finding that the FOS is only permitted to consider a complaint under the compulsory jurisdiction if it relates to an act or omission by a firm in carrying out regulated activities, and a complaint about the handling of a complaint is not a complaint about the provision or failure to provide a financial service, though a s404 scheme would have come within FOS's jurisdiction pursuant to s404B FSMA.

We shall have to wait and see whether the Court of Appeal's decision in CGL is appealed, or if any other claimants try their luck with ever-more creative arguments as to why a duty does exist. Any claimant whose original claims are time-barred and therefore hoping to have another bite of the cherry by reworking their original allegations as breaches of duty will most likely have had any hopes dashed by this decision.


1. (1) CGL Group Limited (2) Jacqueline Bartels & Adrian Bartels (3) WW Property Investments Limited Appellants v (1) The Royal Bank of Scotland plc & National Westminster Bank plc (2) Barclays Bank plc (3) National Westminster Bank plc [2017] EWCA Civ 1073

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions