UK: Matthew Taylor: A Question Of Quality

Last Updated: 1 September 2017
Article by Henry Ker

Matthew Taylor, head of the government's employment review, talks quality work, strengthening employer-employee relations, and making flexible working fair.

What is the core aim of the review?

The aim is to explore how we can fulfil the ambition that all work in the British economy is fair and decent, with scope for development and fulfilment.

The way in which we went about that was to look at three broad areas. Exploitation: where is it that people are being exploited and why and what can be done about it? Clarity: how could we bring greater clarity and consistency throughout regulation and taxation? Then thirdly, incentives: how do we address the underlying drivers to create an overall system that promoted good work?

Overall our labour market is strong and we have higher levels of employment than ever before. There are high levels of employment participation among most groups, although more needs to be done to help minority status groups such as BME [black and minority ethnic] and people with disabilities.

On an international level, broadly speaking the UK labour market is good. The really positive news is at the moment a combination of the living wage and the tightness of the labour market means that incomes are rising fastest amongst the lowest-paid workers.

But the current challenges include the need for better work. There are still people who are finding it hard to manage on their incomes and who, despite working hard, find it difficult to make ends meet.

At the very least we should offer those people decent work and the possibility for progression. Bad work is negative for health and wellbeing, and that is not just a problem for the individual but has a knock-on effect on the rest of society.

“There are still people who are finding it hard to manage on their incomes and who, despite working hard, find it difficult to make ends meet”

Then there is a relationship between good work and productivity. If we can improve the quality of work and management we would make some contribution to solving our woeful productivity record.

I also think that we need our work to reflect what we say about citizenship in civil society. We want citizens who are active and engaged and for them to take back control; employees who are trusted and respected and given autonomy.

The final challenge is that technology is going to make a huge impact in the years to come. It is important that we approach the opportunities and threats of technology with the goal in mind that it improves the quality of people’s work.

Was there anything surprising in the evidence you received for the review?

There was nothing that came up in the review that I had never heard before or arrived completely out of the blue.

Certain things were, however, confirmed for us. Among those things, is that one of the challenges of labour-market regulation and policy is that different people doing exactly the same job can have very different feelings about it.

Alongside that, flexibility is great for some and not so great for others. There is a problem with what we called in the report ‘one-way flexibility’; this was people who feel that the flexibility is all on the side of the employer and the organisation, and not on the side of the individual. We considered various things to try to address that.

I also began to see the connections between employment and education, health and welfare, and it emphasised to me the importance of a holistic approach to good work.

Are there key recommendations in the report you want to highlight?

It is important to say that if you are an organisation that employs people as ‘employees’ – to distinguish from other categories of workers, such as zero-hours workers, agency workers, gig workers and so on – there is little to nothing in our report that should increase your costs.

Because I actually think the ‘employment wedge’, the cost of taking people on as employees, is high enough already.

The two areas you might want to look at if you are the board of an organisation are, firstly, your labour supply chain. We have recommendations around this such as greater transparency; companies have to be more open and take more responsibility for what happens in their labour supply chain.

Secondly, we have recommendations about trying to make it much easier for workers to gain access to independent representation, information and consultation.

The bar for access to this has been set very high in the past and we want to significantly lower it. It is an important principle that all workers can have independent representation and have rights to information about company strategy and consultation over things that may affect their service and position.

You say in the report that ‘the best way to achieve better work is not national regulation but responsible corporate governance, good management and strong employment relations within the organisation’. Can you explain a bit more of the thinking behind this?

The key point is that sometimes people think a particular form of employment leads to a particular set of outcomes and I do not think that that is the case.

There is good employment and bad employment; there are good zero-hours contracts and there are exploitative zero-hours contracts. Gig employment works for a lot of people, but not so well for others.

What matters for people is whether or not the organisation they work for, or even an organisation that pays them as a self-employed contractor, treats them fairly and decently.

The way that we would improve the lives of the most workers in the economy is by improvement in the quality of management across the board. That is the point I wanted to emphasise.

And I share Sir Charlie Mayfield’s [chairman of the John Lewis Partnership and head of the new Productivity Leaders Group] view on productivity: if we could improve the quality of management in British business – and management of people is arguably the most important element – we could make a real difference to our poor productivity performance.

“If we could improve the quality of management in British business we could make a real difference to our poor productivity performance”

With looking to strengthen employee-employer relations, we argue for renewed emphasis on employee engagement. As I mentioned before, we specifically recommend that it should be much easier for people to have access to independent representation, information and consultation.

The ‘informing and consulting employees’ (ICE) regulations were introduced in 2005 and give staff a legal right to be consulted about certain issues at work which may affect them.

However, they have not been taken up very widely because the threshold to enact them is 10% of the entire workforce (or 15 employees, whichever is higher) of the organisation. That is a very high bar.

That is the same threshold as the bar for trade union recognition. Trade unions, who ordinarily might be the bodies who are trying to get workers an ICE agreement, will not bother when that 10% of employees might actually get them trade union recognition.

To counter that, we have recommended reducing the 10% to 2%, which hopefully will make it a lot easier for employees that want independent representation, better information and consultation to have access to it.

We also argue that – although this is not a recommendation for government to act, but a soft recommendation for companies – companies should undertake regular and robust independent surveys of employee engagement and satisfaction, and should have the courage to release those publicly.

Increasingly people look at websites like Glassdoor [a jobs and recruitment website featuring reviews of companies, as well as information like CEO approval ratings, salary reports and interview reviews] for information about employers.

There are quite a lot of companies that have done surveys but sometimes they are not that rigorous and are not published. We would encourage companies to see the publication of a robust and independent assessment of employee satisfaction as a good way of talking about what that company is and what they are trying to aspire to. That can be used to connect with consumers and investors.

You mentioned ‘the quality of people’s work’ as a major factor – how do you define something like that and how do you go about improving it?

It is important to remember different people have different motivations when it comes to work, however we offer one definition of ‘quality’ in the report.

Although we could have picked a number of frameworks, we settled upon the ‘QuInnE’ model. This seemed a good starting point and we then look at it in more detail in the report.

Of course pay and conditions matter in relation to quality, and they matter in particular for people who have poor pay and poor conditions. Once you think your pay and conditions are reasonable, then generally the things that matter to people are a sense of purpose and meaning, trust and autonomy; and a sense of teamwork and fairness within the organisation.


The ‘QuInnE’ model of job quality was developed by the Institute of Employment Research and others as part of a pan-European research programme.

It outlines six high-level indicators of quality: wages, employment quality, education and training, working conditions, work-life balance, and consultative participation and collective representation.

‘Fairness’ is also a word used a lot in the report. What does it mean to you in this context?

There are different ideas of fairness but an important one is intra-organisation fairness. That is the idea that an organisation is treating people properly and that is why we worry about the issue of one-sided flexibility – where companies are transferring all the risk onto the shoulders of workers and often the most vulnerable workers.

Fairness is about the just distribution of risk and reward in an organisation.

One-sided flexibility is a model where the organisation has a lot of flexibility but the employee has a lot less. It is when people on zero-hours or very short-hour contracts turn up for work but there is nothing available to them.

Or we have situations where people can work for years on a zero-hours contract and actually get plenty of hours of work every week but that work is never guaranteed, and that has a knock-on effect of preventing them from being able to get a mortgage or loan.

Then we have situations where workers feel because they have no guaranteed hours, if they have an argument with their boss or raise a matter for concern they could lose the hours that they desperately need – there is an imbalance of power.

“We have a responsibility to protect the interests of the most vulnerable in society and to ensure that people genuinely have opportunity throughout their working lives”

We are proposing the idea of a higher minimum wage for non-guaranteed hours in order to address some of the problems with one-sided flexibility. This would also apply to worker groups such as gig workers, and it is something that has been taken up in New York and Australia already.

The other issue of fairness is more at a societal level. We have a responsibility to protect the interests of the most vulnerable in society and a responsibility to ensure that people genuinely have opportunity throughout their working lives to develop, grow, and improve the quality of their work.

Beyond that higher minimum wage for non-guaranteed hours, we do not get into the issue of pay with ‘fairness’ as that is slightly beyond our remit, but it clearly does matter to people. There is, however, an existing commitment to increasing the living wage, and I think people have not really got their heads around how big an impact that will have.

Instead, we focus particularly on this question of quality. For us it is clear that the worst work tends to be the work undertaken by the people who are also the least privileged in society. Disadvantages cluster together and addressing this issue is one way toward a fairer society.

Technology is something you mentioned at the start. How is technology affecting the way we work?

One clear way is through gig working and platform-based models. We have a bit to say about that, and we can enable those platforms to offer proper flexibility while also protecting workers’ rights.

Here at the Royal Society of Arts, we are also doing a lot of work on automation and its potential impact. However, we do not cover the topic extensively in the report because this future impact of technology and automation is still too unclear.

However, we do think industrial strategy is too focused on the high-end, high-export sectors and not sufficiently focused on lower-skilled and lower-paid areas.

We need to think not just about technology but about interaction between technology and people. Some of the lower-paid sectors, most obviously retail and hospitality, are going to be strongly affected by technology and the Low Pay Commission should take a much more active role in thinking about how to promote better work in those sectors.

Is greater clarity needed around employment law?

One of the areas that needs clarifying is around categorisation of workers.

We are suggesting that people who are currently referred to as gig workers be classified under a new category as ‘dependent contractors’. We feel ‘dependent contractors’ would better reflect the particular employment circumstances they face.

However, employment law generally is an issue of contention. Some people argue that the law is clear, it is just about the implementation of it. But that was not the majority view of people I spoke to.

Because of this, we are recommending new primary legislation to help better define the distinction between self-employed people and workers. Over time this will also help align the distinction in employment law with the distinction between self-employed people and employees in tax law.

What would you see as success for this report?

I know it is easy to make broad recommendations; it is a very different matter actually implementing them in law. The government has now got to go away to consult, to consider, and will respond by the end of the year.

My intention is not to be a backseat driver in that process. What matters to me most of all is a broad commitment to improving the quality of work in the British economy and I will look with interest to see how the government responds.

“My intention is not to be a backseat driver in the government's response”

Of course I would like to see as many of our specific recommendations as possible implemented. I have spent my life working on public policy, so to have ideas that I have developed with my review team passed into law would be something I would feel very proud of. But obviously it is more important that a difference is made to people’s lives.

I would especially like to see some of the review’s broad strategic principles around issues like tax, employability and health enacted, because I think we need a joined up approach to improving the quality of work.

Since we published the report, I am delighted that the question around quality of work has entered into the public discourse.

If you were to ask me to choose one thing that I would hope for in ten years’ time, it is that we would still be focusing on the quality and the importance of good work, and that there was a greater recognition of this importance among policymakers, investors, consumers, employers and employees.

Interview by Henry Ker, editor of Governance and Compliance

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions