UK: Matthew Taylor: A Question Of Quality

Last Updated: 1 September 2017
Article by Henry Ker

Matthew Taylor, head of the government's employment review, talks quality work, strengthening employer-employee relations, and making flexible working fair.

What is the core aim of the review?

The aim is to explore how we can fulfil the ambition that all work in the British economy is fair and decent, with scope for development and fulfilment.

The way in which we went about that was to look at three broad areas. Exploitation: where is it that people are being exploited and why and what can be done about it? Clarity: how could we bring greater clarity and consistency throughout regulation and taxation? Then thirdly, incentives: how do we address the underlying drivers to create an overall system that promoted good work?

Overall our labour market is strong and we have higher levels of employment than ever before. There are high levels of employment participation among most groups, although more needs to be done to help minority status groups such as BME [black and minority ethnic] and people with disabilities.

On an international level, broadly speaking the UK labour market is good. The really positive news is at the moment a combination of the living wage and the tightness of the labour market means that incomes are rising fastest amongst the lowest-paid workers.

But the current challenges include the need for better work. There are still people who are finding it hard to manage on their incomes and who, despite working hard, find it difficult to make ends meet.

At the very least we should offer those people decent work and the possibility for progression. Bad work is negative for health and wellbeing, and that is not just a problem for the individual but has a knock-on effect on the rest of society.

“There are still people who are finding it hard to manage on their incomes and who, despite working hard, find it difficult to make ends meet”

Then there is a relationship between good work and productivity. If we can improve the quality of work and management we would make some contribution to solving our woeful productivity record.

I also think that we need our work to reflect what we say about citizenship in civil society. We want citizens who are active and engaged and for them to take back control; employees who are trusted and respected and given autonomy.

The final challenge is that technology is going to make a huge impact in the years to come. It is important that we approach the opportunities and threats of technology with the goal in mind that it improves the quality of people’s work.

Was there anything surprising in the evidence you received for the review?

There was nothing that came up in the review that I had never heard before or arrived completely out of the blue.

Certain things were, however, confirmed for us. Among those things, is that one of the challenges of labour-market regulation and policy is that different people doing exactly the same job can have very different feelings about it.

Alongside that, flexibility is great for some and not so great for others. There is a problem with what we called in the report ‘one-way flexibility’; this was people who feel that the flexibility is all on the side of the employer and the organisation, and not on the side of the individual. We considered various things to try to address that.

I also began to see the connections between employment and education, health and welfare, and it emphasised to me the importance of a holistic approach to good work.

Are there key recommendations in the report you want to highlight?

It is important to say that if you are an organisation that employs people as ‘employees’ – to distinguish from other categories of workers, such as zero-hours workers, agency workers, gig workers and so on – there is little to nothing in our report that should increase your costs.

Because I actually think the ‘employment wedge’, the cost of taking people on as employees, is high enough already.

The two areas you might want to look at if you are the board of an organisation are, firstly, your labour supply chain. We have recommendations around this such as greater transparency; companies have to be more open and take more responsibility for what happens in their labour supply chain.

Secondly, we have recommendations about trying to make it much easier for workers to gain access to independent representation, information and consultation.

The bar for access to this has been set very high in the past and we want to significantly lower it. It is an important principle that all workers can have independent representation and have rights to information about company strategy and consultation over things that may affect their service and position.

You say in the report that ‘the best way to achieve better work is not national regulation but responsible corporate governance, good management and strong employment relations within the organisation’. Can you explain a bit more of the thinking behind this?

The key point is that sometimes people think a particular form of employment leads to a particular set of outcomes and I do not think that that is the case.

There is good employment and bad employment; there are good zero-hours contracts and there are exploitative zero-hours contracts. Gig employment works for a lot of people, but not so well for others.

What matters for people is whether or not the organisation they work for, or even an organisation that pays them as a self-employed contractor, treats them fairly and decently.

The way that we would improve the lives of the most workers in the economy is by improvement in the quality of management across the board. That is the point I wanted to emphasise.

And I share Sir Charlie Mayfield’s [chairman of the John Lewis Partnership and head of the new Productivity Leaders Group] view on productivity: if we could improve the quality of management in British business – and management of people is arguably the most important element – we could make a real difference to our poor productivity performance.

“If we could improve the quality of management in British business we could make a real difference to our poor productivity performance”

With looking to strengthen employee-employer relations, we argue for renewed emphasis on employee engagement. As I mentioned before, we specifically recommend that it should be much easier for people to have access to independent representation, information and consultation.

The ‘informing and consulting employees’ (ICE) regulations were introduced in 2005 and give staff a legal right to be consulted about certain issues at work which may affect them.

However, they have not been taken up very widely because the threshold to enact them is 10% of the entire workforce (or 15 employees, whichever is higher) of the organisation. That is a very high bar.

That is the same threshold as the bar for trade union recognition. Trade unions, who ordinarily might be the bodies who are trying to get workers an ICE agreement, will not bother when that 10% of employees might actually get them trade union recognition.

To counter that, we have recommended reducing the 10% to 2%, which hopefully will make it a lot easier for employees that want independent representation, better information and consultation to have access to it.

We also argue that – although this is not a recommendation for government to act, but a soft recommendation for companies – companies should undertake regular and robust independent surveys of employee engagement and satisfaction, and should have the courage to release those publicly.

Increasingly people look at websites like Glassdoor [a jobs and recruitment website featuring reviews of companies, as well as information like CEO approval ratings, salary reports and interview reviews] for information about employers.

There are quite a lot of companies that have done surveys but sometimes they are not that rigorous and are not published. We would encourage companies to see the publication of a robust and independent assessment of employee satisfaction as a good way of talking about what that company is and what they are trying to aspire to. That can be used to connect with consumers and investors.

You mentioned ‘the quality of people’s work’ as a major factor – how do you define something like that and how do you go about improving it?

It is important to remember different people have different motivations when it comes to work, however we offer one definition of ‘quality’ in the report.

Although we could have picked a number of frameworks, we settled upon the ‘QuInnE’ model. This seemed a good starting point and we then look at it in more detail in the report.

Of course pay and conditions matter in relation to quality, and they matter in particular for people who have poor pay and poor conditions. Once you think your pay and conditions are reasonable, then generally the things that matter to people are a sense of purpose and meaning, trust and autonomy; and a sense of teamwork and fairness within the organisation.


The ‘QuInnE’ model of job quality was developed by the Institute of Employment Research and others as part of a pan-European research programme.

It outlines six high-level indicators of quality: wages, employment quality, education and training, working conditions, work-life balance, and consultative participation and collective representation.

‘Fairness’ is also a word used a lot in the report. What does it mean to you in this context?

There are different ideas of fairness but an important one is intra-organisation fairness. That is the idea that an organisation is treating people properly and that is why we worry about the issue of one-sided flexibility – where companies are transferring all the risk onto the shoulders of workers and often the most vulnerable workers.

Fairness is about the just distribution of risk and reward in an organisation.

One-sided flexibility is a model where the organisation has a lot of flexibility but the employee has a lot less. It is when people on zero-hours or very short-hour contracts turn up for work but there is nothing available to them.

Or we have situations where people can work for years on a zero-hours contract and actually get plenty of hours of work every week but that work is never guaranteed, and that has a knock-on effect of preventing them from being able to get a mortgage or loan.

Then we have situations where workers feel because they have no guaranteed hours, if they have an argument with their boss or raise a matter for concern they could lose the hours that they desperately need – there is an imbalance of power.

“We have a responsibility to protect the interests of the most vulnerable in society and to ensure that people genuinely have opportunity throughout their working lives”

We are proposing the idea of a higher minimum wage for non-guaranteed hours in order to address some of the problems with one-sided flexibility. This would also apply to worker groups such as gig workers, and it is something that has been taken up in New York and Australia already.

The other issue of fairness is more at a societal level. We have a responsibility to protect the interests of the most vulnerable in society and a responsibility to ensure that people genuinely have opportunity throughout their working lives to develop, grow, and improve the quality of their work.

Beyond that higher minimum wage for non-guaranteed hours, we do not get into the issue of pay with ‘fairness’ as that is slightly beyond our remit, but it clearly does matter to people. There is, however, an existing commitment to increasing the living wage, and I think people have not really got their heads around how big an impact that will have.

Instead, we focus particularly on this question of quality. For us it is clear that the worst work tends to be the work undertaken by the people who are also the least privileged in society. Disadvantages cluster together and addressing this issue is one way toward a fairer society.

Technology is something you mentioned at the start. How is technology affecting the way we work?

One clear way is through gig working and platform-based models. We have a bit to say about that, and we can enable those platforms to offer proper flexibility while also protecting workers’ rights.

Here at the Royal Society of Arts, we are also doing a lot of work on automation and its potential impact. However, we do not cover the topic extensively in the report because this future impact of technology and automation is still too unclear.

However, we do think industrial strategy is too focused on the high-end, high-export sectors and not sufficiently focused on lower-skilled and lower-paid areas.

We need to think not just about technology but about interaction between technology and people. Some of the lower-paid sectors, most obviously retail and hospitality, are going to be strongly affected by technology and the Low Pay Commission should take a much more active role in thinking about how to promote better work in those sectors.

Is greater clarity needed around employment law?

One of the areas that needs clarifying is around categorisation of workers.

We are suggesting that people who are currently referred to as gig workers be classified under a new category as ‘dependent contractors’. We feel ‘dependent contractors’ would better reflect the particular employment circumstances they face.

However, employment law generally is an issue of contention. Some people argue that the law is clear, it is just about the implementation of it. But that was not the majority view of people I spoke to.

Because of this, we are recommending new primary legislation to help better define the distinction between self-employed people and workers. Over time this will also help align the distinction in employment law with the distinction between self-employed people and employees in tax law.

What would you see as success for this report?

I know it is easy to make broad recommendations; it is a very different matter actually implementing them in law. The government has now got to go away to consult, to consider, and will respond by the end of the year.

My intention is not to be a backseat driver in that process. What matters to me most of all is a broad commitment to improving the quality of work in the British economy and I will look with interest to see how the government responds.

“My intention is not to be a backseat driver in the government's response”

Of course I would like to see as many of our specific recommendations as possible implemented. I have spent my life working on public policy, so to have ideas that I have developed with my review team passed into law would be something I would feel very proud of. But obviously it is more important that a difference is made to people’s lives.

I would especially like to see some of the review’s broad strategic principles around issues like tax, employability and health enacted, because I think we need a joined up approach to improving the quality of work.

Since we published the report, I am delighted that the question around quality of work has entered into the public discourse.

If you were to ask me to choose one thing that I would hope for in ten years’ time, it is that we would still be focusing on the quality and the importance of good work, and that there was a greater recognition of this importance among policymakers, investors, consumers, employers and employees.

Interview by Henry Ker, editor of Governance and Compliance

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.