UK: IP Snapshot: May/June 2008

Last Updated: 25 June 2008
Article by Nick Beckett, Isabel Davies and Tom Scourfield


Digipos Store Solutions group Limited v Digi International Inc (High Court)

The High Court upheld the opposition of the Hearing Officer to the registration of the appellant's marks on the grounds of a likelihood of confusion between these and the earlier registered marks of the respondent, all containing the term DIGI. The Judge clearly disagreed with the approach of the Hearing Officer towards the descriptive nature of the DIGI prefix, and made it clear that he would have reached a different result were he entitled to consider the case afresh. However, he stated he was bound to accept the Hearing Officer's decision in the absence of a "distinct and material error of principle" or the Hearing Officer being "clearly wrong".

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Eurohypo AG v OHIM (ECJ)

The ECJ confirmed that the mark EUROHYPO lacked distinctive character under Article 7(1)(b) of the CTM regulation, as it would be perceived as providing information about the type of services it designated (financial). However, the CFI's reasoning had been incorrect in assessing distinctiveness under Article 7(1)(b) solely by reference to descriptive character under Article 7(1)(c).

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Rousselon Freres et Cie v Horwood Homewares Limited (High Court)

This case concerned the use of the SABATIER trade mark in juxtaposition with JUDGE or STELLAR. The Court found that the mark SABATIER did retain an independent distinctive role in the marks JUDGE SABATIER and STELLAR SABATIER. Therefore and given that the goods were identical, it was not possible to maintain that there is no likelihood of confusion between the SABATIER mark and the JUDGE SABATIER and STELLAR SABATIER marks. In reaching this conclusion, it was not necessary for the earlier mark to have a dominant role in the composite mark; average distinctiveness was sufficient.

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Ferrero Deutschland GmbH (ECJ)

A Swiss bakery firm, Cornu, applied to register the word FERRO as a Community trade mark for salted biscuits in Class 30. This was opposed by Ferrero, the confectionery manufacturer, on the basis of a risk of confusion. The ECJ found that although there was a low degree of similarity between the products, ie. between chocolate-covered confectionery and salted biscuits, there was a reasonable degree of similarity between the signs, and the reputation of the FERRERO mark in Germany was so great that there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks among German consumers.

Citigroup, Inc. and Citibank, NA v OHIM (CFI)

The CFI upheld the appeal of OHIM against one of its Board of Appeal decisions, finding that there was a similarity between a figurative mark containing the word "CITI", applied for in relation to services in class 36, and the earlier word mark CITIBANK, applied for, among other CITI based marks, in relation to 'financial affairs' and 'real estate services'. The CFI found that the earlier CITIBANK mark had a reputation, and that there was a risk of unfair advantage being taken in relation to the mark.

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Adidas AG and another v Marca Mode CV and others (ECJ)

The ECJ provided a judgment relating to Adidas' famous three-stripes logo, and came down firmly on the side of the sportswear manufacturer. The dispute saw Adidas sue fashion outlet H &M for trade mark infringement in response to the use of similar stripes by H&M on its clothing. The case had reached the Dutch Supreme Court who turned to the ECJ for guidance. The ECJ ruled on whether the general interest in the availability of given signs in the market should have any bearing on the protection provided by a trade mark. The ECJ ruled that the requirement of availability should not play a part in assessing confusion.

For our full Law-Now on this decision, click here.


Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Cassina SpA (ECJ)

The ECJ has given a narrow construction to Article 4(1) of the Copyright Directive (2001/29/EC), closely following the opinion of the Advocate General. In particular, the term "distribution" as used in the Directive requires a transfer of property and is not satisfied by making goods temporarily available for use by the public, or by exhibiting the goods to them.

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Fisher v Brooker and another (Court of Appeal)

The Court of Appeal has overturned the High Court's ruling of December 2006 which granted the former organist of the band Procol Harum a 40% share in the musical copyright in the band's 1967 hit single "A Whiter Shade of Pale" 38 years after the record was first released.

For our full Law-Now on this decision, click here.


Mosley v News Group Newspapers Limited (High Court)

The High Court refused to grant an injunction to prevent video footage of Max Mosley, the head of Formula 1 motor-racing, being shown on the News of the World website. Despite dismissing the newspaper's public-interest arguments under Article 10 ECHR, the court considered material was so readily available on a range of other websites and therefore that granting an injunction would make very little practical difference and would be a futile gesture. The decision is perhaps not surprising but is a useful reminder that it is difficult to obtain an injunction to prevent publication of material which is widely available in the public domain.

For our full Law-Now on this decision, click here

David Murray (by his litigation friends Neil Murray and Joanne Murray) v Big Pictures Limited (Court of Appeal)

The Court of Appeal has reinstated the case brought on behalf of JK Rowling's infant son, David Murray, following the covert taking and subsequent publication of a photograph of David and his family in the street. In assessing the Article 8 right of a reasonable expectation of privacy, the court held that a child of famous parents, who had not sought publicity for their children, could expect the same degree of protection as a child of ordinary parents. The decision is likely to make photographers/publishers more cautious when taking pictures of children regardless of the nature of the activity being photographed.

For the full text of the decision, click here.


Actavis UK Limited v Merck & Co Inc (Court of Appeal)

The Court of Appeal has recently handed down a significant judgment in the case of Actavis v Merck, ruling that a Swiss form claim for the use of a pharmaceutical in the manufacture of a medicament could be allowed even where the novelty lay only in a new dosing regime. Emphasising the importance of taking an approach consistent with that of the EPO, the Court rejected arguments that it was bound not to allow such a claim on the basis of the Court of Appeal judgment in Bristol-Myers Squibb v Baker Norton. The case is likely to be of great interest to the pharmaceutical industry, as it provides a more consistent approach to patentability of Swiss claims across the European Patent Convention countries, and will improve the prospects of pharmaceutical companies seeking to obtain patent protection in the UK for new applications of known substances.

For our full Law-Now on this decision, click here.

T 1319/04 - 3.3.02 Dosage regimen/KOS LIFE SCIENCES, INC. (EPO Board of Appeal)

The European Patent Office Board of Appeal has referred two questions concerning the interpretation of the "second medical use" provisions of the EPC 2000 as introduced in December last year. Specifically, whether it was possible to patent a medicament which is already known for treatment of the same illness where the only novel aspect is the new method of treatment / dosing.

For the full text of the decision, click here.

Rolawn Limited and Rolawn (Turf Growers) Ltd v Turfmech Ltd (High Court)

The High Court held that the claimants' unregistered and registered design rights were not infringed by the defendant in an action involving wide-area mowers. The High Court held that although unregistered design rights subsisted in various physical aspects of the claimants' mower, and in their configuration, there were no design rights in anything more general, and in particular not in relation to the methods or principles of construction. There had, the Court found, been no copying of any material aspects of the mower and no infringement. Likewise there was no breach of any registered design right, as the design of the mower created a different overall impression. The Defendant failed in its challenge to validity, with the High Court finding the overall design of the claimants had distinctive character.

For the full text of the decision, click here.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 19/06/2008.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.