UK: Adjudication Watch - The Latest Cases And Issues June 2017

Key point: ensure contracts are formalised in writing to avoid costly disputes

RSC Contractors Limited v Anthony Conway [2017]

RSC agreed to carry out groundworks for Mr Conway as a subcontractor at three separate sites. A dispute arose and following an adjudication in which RSC were successful, Mr Conway now submitted that the adjudicator had no jurisdiction alleging he had wrongly concluded that there was one oral contract covering all three sites. Mr Conway argued that there were three separate oral contracts.

Under section 108(1) of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 as amended (the Construction Act), the adjudicator would only have jurisdiction in this case if the dispute was a single dispute arising under one contract.

As there was no written agreement between the parties, it was necessary to determine the facts from the witness evidence and actions of the parties. Mr Justice Coulson concluded (in agreement with the adjudicator on this point) that there had been one contract covering all three sites.

This decision highlights:

  1. the importance of agreeing written terms so that parties achieve certainty in their contractual relationship (but remember that if this has not been done, the Construction Act may still apply).
  2. the risks inherent in pursuing disputes arising out of oral contracts which can result in a lengthy and costly process.

Key point: the courts remain reluctant to disturb an adjudicator's decision

AECOM Design Build Limited v Staptina Engineering Services Limited [2017]

AECOM engaged Staptina to undertake mechanical installation sub-contract works at Long Reach treatment works in Dartford under an NEC Short Subcontract form June 2005 with amendments.

Following an adjudication in which AECOM successfully argued the right to make deductions, AECOM then challenged the adjudicator's decision. AECOM argued that certain parts of the decision were unenforceable, as the adjudicator had acted outside her jurisdiction and/or in breach of natural justice in limiting the deductions that could be made by AECOM.

AECOM submitted that the dispute referred to the adjudicator was limited to the principle of deductions, and did not give the adjudicator jurisdiction to decide how those deductions were to be made - in other words, the adjudicator should have answered "yes" or "no"; she should not have gone on to decide "how" or "how much".

AECOM were not successful and Mr Justice Fraser emphasised that the key point was whether or not the adjudicator had focused correctly on the dispute that had been referred, which established the parameters of her jurisdiction:

"If there are only two answers available, yet an adjudicator were to choose (perhaps incorrectly) a third, that does not go to her acting outside her jurisdiction. That would be answering the right question in the wrong way. That is not the same as answering the wrong question".

In this case, the Notice of Adjudication given by Staptina had sought a specific declaration "or such declaration as the Adjudicator deems proper" (with similar wording in the referral notice). This was described by the parties as the "catch all" provision and relied upon by Staptina in these proceedings. Whilst it was outside (obiter) this decision, Mr Justice Fraser stated that such wording "should not be seen by parties as giving any adjudicator carte blanche to go outside the scope of the dispute referred to them in any particular case".

Key point: specifically reserve any right to challenge an adjudicator's jurisdiction before each step

Dawnus Construction Holdings Limited v Marsh Life Limited [2017]

Marsh engaged Dawnus to design and build a hotel together with retail and restaurant units at Lifeboat Quay in Poole under a JCT 2011 Design & Build Contract. A dispute arose relating to the account upon termination and, in due course, Dawnus sought to enforce an adjudicator's decision in its favour.

Marsh argued that the adjudicator had failed to apply the rules of natural justice by failing to consider and deal with all defences put forward. The key point ultimately however was that on receipt of the adjudicator's decision, both Marsh and Dawnus had asked the adjudicator to correct parts of the decision under the slip rule in s.108(3A) of the Construction Act.

HHJ McKenna held (as argued by Dawnus) that Marsh had waived its right to challenge jurisdiction by requesting an amendment under the slip rule. He stated: "It cannot be right that in such circumstances it is open to a party to an adjudication simultaneously to approbate and to reprobate a decision of the Adjudicator".

Key point: an adjudication decision is binding unless and until challenged in court (or arbitration where applicable)

Mailbox (Birmingham) Ltd v Galliford Try Building Ltd (formerly Galliford Construction Ltd) [2017]

Mailbox employed Galliford Try to construct a development in Birmingham under an amended JCT form of contract.

The dispute before the court related to Galliford Try's allegation that Mailbox had wrongfully terminated and/or repudiated the contract, together with Galliford Try's claims for extensions of time and Mailbox's claim for liquidated damages (LDs).

Simplifying for these purposes the complex background to this decision, the key points are:

  1. In March 2016, Mailbox commenced an adjudication (A1) seeking a declaration that it was entitled to LDs of approximately £5m (its entire claim for LDs).
  2. In adjudication one, Galliford Try stated that it was limiting its defence to specific issues (an approach described by Mr Justice Coulson as "an unwise course"); outside the adjudication however, it served a "full" extension of time claim.
  3. The adjudicator considered that the adjudication could not be so restricted by the terms of Galliford Try's defence and awarded Mailbox large sums of money by way of LDs. Galliford Try did not pay, despite successful enforcement proceedings by Mailbox.
  4. On 13 April 2017:
    1. Galliford Try commenced an adjudication (A2) focusing on the lawfulness (or not) of the termination - a consideration would include whether or not Galliford Try was proceeding regularly and diligently with the works and in turn the completion date and any extension to that date.
    2. Mailbox commenced these proceedings seeking a declaration that its entitlement to LDs had been decided in A1 and so no further extension of time claim by Galliford Try could be considered in A2.

In summary, Mr Justice Coulson concluded that:

  • Unless and until decided by the court, Mailbox's entitlement to LDs was as decided in A1 and this could not be disturbed by any subsequent adjudication.
  • As a result, Galliford Try could not seek any further extensions of time in the second adjudication - the Judge confirmed that an extension of time was a defence to a claim for LDs and "where the employer's entitlement to liquidated damages has been fixed, a claim for an extension of time [becomes] redundant".
  • It would of course remain open to Galliford Try to challenge the adjudicator's decision in court proceedings in which it could raise all its arguments about extensions of time.
  • In the termination dispute referred in A2, Galliford Try could raise any point relating to its obligation to regularly and diligently perform the works, although Mailbox's financial entitlement as a result of A1 would remain unaffected.

Mr Justice Coulson clearly stated in his conclusion that Galliford Try was not entitled to any extension of time beyond that awarded in A1 unless and until that is modified or altered by the court.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
14 Sep 2017, Seminar, Birmingham, UK

Has Cloud replaced traditional outsourcing models? We will compare cloud to outsourcing, consider whether they have effectively become the same thing for many solutions and assess some of the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

21 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

Has Cloud replaced traditional outsourcing models? We will compare cloud to outsourcing, consider whether they have effectively become the same thing for many solutions and assess some of the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.