UK: The Best Line Of Defence

Last Updated: 6 July 2017
Article by Tom Hollobone

An effective anti-corruption and bribery programme is vital to protect a company's reputation

Kroll's latest annual 'Anti-Bribery and Corruption Benchmarking Report' revealed a marked upshift in the importance of reputational risk. In this year's survey, reputational concern has now become the top reason third parties fail to meet an organisation's standards, overtaking dealing with sanctioned entities, involvement in opaque corporate structures, and exposure to politically exposed persons.

This increased concern around reputation is reflected in recent media reports. Consider GSK, which according to a December 2013 report in the Financial Times, suffered an estimated 60% decline in Chinese sales after it was accused of bribing doctors to promote its products in China.

Senior executives interviewed by business ethics firm Ethisphere as part of Kroll's report discussed the impact such an event can have. Ricardo Turra, Global Director of Internal Audit at Votorantim Cimentos, Brazil's largest cement company, concisely encapsulates the sentiment of many of the survey respondents: 'Hours or days can destroy decades spent to create a great brand.'

The visible impact of reputational damage will no doubt have caught the eye of board members across the world, and is now driving an increased focus on anti-bribery and corruption measures from senior leadership teams, not just from risk teams and compliance officers.

Board members have broadened their vision; whereas once they focused primarily on regulatory risk, they now increasingly acknowledge that reputational risk is closely associated with the

board's good standing and their organisation's share price. Boards are starting to gain a greater appreciation of the input their role has in the success of their anti-corruption programme.

Board authority

'The tone from the top' has long been cited as a key component of a successful compliance programme – and with good reason. Boards decide how much focus and budget a programme will receive, and use their authority to drive home the types of behaviours the organisation will foster, or at least accept. Take this support away and the most able compliance teams will struggle to be effective.

In Kroll's report, Kristen Ludgate, Chief Compliance Officer at 3M, noted the importance of the 'tone in the middle', which involves departmental and business unit management keeping a watchful eye on business practice at the local operational level. She adds: 'Compliance doesn't really happen at the centre of the company, it happens on the ground.'

Effective anti-corruption programmes, then, should do more than simply ensure regulatory compliance; they should enhance commercial practice. An organisation's anti-corruption programme should move far beyond 'box-ticking' exercises for existing or potential third parties. It can help to identify issues that could materially affect the success of the business, such as conflicts of interest, business continuity problems, financial weakness, or potential legal disputes, along with a host of other issues.

Due diligence

In a recent example, an organisation entering a joint venture conducted due diligence, in line with its compliance programme, on a shipyard owner in Spain and a number of third parties. Although no bribery or corruption concerns were identified, the due diligence unearthed concerns about the financial management of the shipyard owner's other businesses. Due to the unique location of the shipyard, it was not possible to find an alternative partner. The organisation pressed ahead, and armed with this information, was able to mitigate the risk by negotiating for control of the joint venture's finance functions.

This example demonstrates how a well-conceived and implemented compliance programme can save the organisation from making the costly mistake of contracting with a bad partner or supplier, including the reputational damage and litigation risk, along with the internal fallout, including wasted time and the need to source an alternative.

Sell the programme internally

Kroll notices organisations increasingly tie-in their anti-corruption programmes to their wider corporate social responsibility initiatives. Many organisations now understand that embracing an anti-corruption programme not only requires management buy-in and compliance processes, but also a change in attitude in the way staff interact and what they understand to be acceptable behaviour.

Setting a positive, open, morally-responsible tone across a business creates an environment in which it is harder to undertake corrupt activity and in which detection and prevention are more achievable. Importantly, it is also evident in the way the business deals with its third parties, again setting the tone for how business should be conducted on its behalf.

The challenge for the board and for compliance officers is demonstrating the return on investment this ethical approach brings to the organisation, which is not always easy, unless they can either prove that a damaging event has been averted, or point to the costs of failure experienced by rival organisations that did not adopt this approach.

Prevention is always better than reaction and getting it wrong is costly. Fines imposed for breaches of anti-bribery legislation far outweigh the cost of an effective compliance programme – and this is before legal bills, the burden of remediation work, and lost opportunity costs while an organisation puts its house in order.

In November 2015, the US Department of Justice announced that French transportation company Alstom agreed to pay $772 million after it admitted bribing government officials in a number of countries. A damaged corporate reputation often has a real impact on the financial performance of an organisation and, for listed entities, on share price.

Ethisphere's 2017 'World's Most Ethical Companies' ranking is one way to demonstrate the upside of successfully managing reputational risk. These publicly traded companies, with comprehensive corporate social responsibility and compliance programmes, outperformed the S&P 500 by 9.6% over the past four years, showing a clear link between ethics and performance.

Third-party risk

For those who do not feel they have an adequate or reasonable programme, the initial step is identifying the risk posed by counterparties, which can be established through risk-ranking. This can also be used to help plan a budget around the cost of implementing or improving a programme.

However, it is not uncommon for organisations to have fragmented data on their third parties spread over a number of systems, business units, and regions. This can be a result of acquisitions not being fully integrated, of regional differences, or simply of an organisation having outgrown its historical governance structure.

There is, however, one data set which will be available to every organisation – financial payment information. Regardless of other constraints and gaps, it is normally possible to access records of outgoing payments to third parties, usually capturing the nature of the goods or services provided, the payment amounts, and the countries where these payments are made. Reviewing this data can quickly give compliance officers a 'snapshot' of their organisation's exposure to third parties.

Detecting suspicious activity

As well as helping to gather information about third parties, finance teams can offer a strong line of defence in detecting suspicious payments. 73% of respondents to Kroll's survey said their CFO either had an active or supporting role in their anti-corruption programme. Preventing a suspicious payment can prove critical to avoiding bribery exposure.

From this point, the process can take a number of paths. Some organisations will choose to conduct basic due diligence to identify whether there are any references to bribery or corruption to indicate where to focus immediate attention. Some will move straight to distributing a third-party questionnaire to gain further risk-relevant information about the third party.

Best practice suggests organisations should also distribute their anti-bribery policies to their third parties, for them to acknowledge. Risk-scoring of the questionnaire can help to flag the higher-risk third parties and those with known issues.

Pilot the programme

The UK Ministry of Justice lists 'a proportionate and risk-based approach' to due diligence as one of the key principles of the UK Bribery Act, and this is likely to be a key factor in being able to demonstrate adequate procedures are in place.

This can, however, still seem a daunting and sometimes impossible task. The perception of an anti-corruption programme for the business can be as important as its content. Many organisations will choose to pilot their programme with a subset of their third parties, whether by business unit or geographically. Lessons learned from this pilot can be used to fine-tune the programme before a larger roll-out across a business.

The benefit for business managers is a well-oiled programme that has minimal impact on their processes, but which could prevent a bribery event from arising and protect the organisation from engaging with a questionable third party.

Above all else, each programme and policy must be tailor-made to fit individual organisations. A programme that is not bespoke may not focus on the key risks specific to that particular business and industry and may not be effective as a result. A programme that is not well-thought through and tailored to individual organisation also may not be well received or adopted by middle management, critical stakeholders for successful implementation.

Continued monitoring

More than half of respondents reported identifying issues with a third party after due diligence and onboarding. Of those, 40% believed the issue did not exist at the time of onboarding. Monitoring plays a key part in maintaining knowledge of an organisation's third-party risk. As with risk-based due diligence, monitoring is one of the main principles of the UK Bribery Act.

Monitoring a large number of third parties can be achieved for a relatively low cost with the help of automated tools, which can flag the most recent results that need to be reviewed. This again should be weighed against the cost of an issue arising when a third party is acting on an organisation's behalf.

Heightened concern

It is no surprise that as the UK Serious Fraud Office and the US Department of Justice ramp up enforcement of their respective Acts, compliance officers and senior managers are becoming more concerned about possible reputational damage that could be caused by failing to have adequate measures to prevent bribery and corruption.

A well-organised, relevant, and proportionate anti-corruption programme has a better chance of preventing an event than a standard approach. Being able to demonstrate this clearly to a regulator or to law enforcement could make the difference between what is deemed an exception, and a serious issue that requires full investigation, potentially inflicting lasting damage to an organisation's reputation and brand.

Tom Hollobone is Senior Director, Compliance, at Kroll

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.