UK: International Arbitration In England - The Arbitration Act 1996

Last Updated: 22 July 1997


  • An overview of key developments
  • More flexible procedures
  • Party autonomy
  • Reduction in the powers of the courts
  • A clear restatement of the law
  • Conclusion
  • The Norton Rose Arbitration Group


"I hope that those from abroad who read the Act will be persuaded that this jurisdiction is an ideal place to hold an international arbitration, since they can now understand what this is likely to entail, and can see that we have tried to reflect generally accepted international views on the proper conduct of the arbitral process." (The Right Honourable Lord Justice Saville)

A new Arbitration Act is set to come into force in England, Wales and Northern Ireland on 31st January 1997. Designed to strengthen London's position as a prime venue for international dispute settlement, the new Act provides arbitration users with a thoroughly modern law to encourage faster, less expensive and less complicated arbitrations. To achieve this, the Act limits the extent to which the courts can become involved, while giving increased freedom to the parties themselves and broad new powers to arbitrators. It ensures that English law remains in step with recent international developments by incorporating most of the provisions of the model arbitration law developed by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) in 1985. The result is an improved legal framework for arbitration which will be attractive and workable for the international business community.

Perhaps the main improvement of interest to international users of arbitration in London is the firm entrenchment in English law of the principle of "party autonomy". Essentially, this principle protects the parties' freedom to choose and define the arbitration procedure they feel best suits the particular circumstances of their dispute. This is especially significant to international commercial parties arbitrating in London because it means that, in the interests of economy and expediency, they will be able to adapt the arbitral procedure to the specific nature of their dispute and to their own legal, cultural and linguistic backgrounds. This allows international parties, for example, to adopt and use legal procedures and practices similar to those with which they may already be familiar in their countries of origin. In fact, the Act positively encourages parties not to follow English rules of court procedure with which foreign parties will almost certainly not be familiar. Moreover, the Act makes specific provision for some aspects of procedure and practice that are entirely foreign to English court proceedings such as inquisitorial initiatives by arbitral tribunals, and "neutral" or tribunal appointed experts. The choice to arbitrate disputes in London will not necessarily be a choice to do so in accordance with English rules.

There are other significant improvements in the new law:

1. The Act conveniently brings together and restates in simple, user-friendly language, the English law on arbitration which was previously spread out over three statutes and in many court decisions.
2. The Act is based on the principles of fairness, impartiality and avoidance of unnecessary delay. These principles, which are clearly spelled out in the Act, will serve as directives to both arbitrators and judges who will have to interpret and apply the new law.
3. The court's power to intervene in and supervise arbitrations is greatly reduced.
4. Arbitrators' powers have been correspondingly increased. Arbitrators, not the courts, will decide such issues as their own jurisdiction, security for costs and whether an arbitration can be dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. The Act confirms the concept of the "separability" of the arbitration clause in English law. This principle operates to preserve the parties' decision to resolve their disputes through private arbitration in cases where the contract containing the arbitration clause may otherwise be void or unenforceable.
6. What is meant by the legal "seat" of an arbitration has been clarified. This ensures that arbitration proceedings, meetings and hearings can take place outside London, when that is more convenient or less expensive, without the loss of the security and advantages resulting from the parties' choice of London as the legal "home" of the arbitration.
7. A broad and commercially practical meaning has been given to the requirement that arbitration agreements be in writing. This now includes a variety of situations such as arbitration agreements which are contained in an exchange of documents or correspondence, those contained in unsigned contracts or which are evidenced in other documents.
8. Arbitrators now have the power to award compound interest.


"... one of the main purposes of the [Act], ... is to encourage arbitral tribunals not slavishly to follow court or other set procedures." (Report of the Departmental Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law)

In the past, too many arbitrations have been conducted as though they were court proceedings. As a result, many of the supposed advantages of arbitration, such as speed and flexibility, were sometimes lost. Section 33 of the Act now specifically requires arbitrators to "adopt procedures suitable to the circumstances of the particular case". The intention for the future is that where the parties fail to agree on procedure, arbitrators will exercise control over the conduct of arbitrations in a flexible and innovative manner, having regard to the wishes of the parties and the nature of the dispute. This practical approach to procedure should allow arbitrators wide discretion for cutting costs even where the parties themselves are unable to agree.

The Act confirms and clarifies other procedural powers which arbitrators may exercise. These include, for example, the right to appoint experts and assessors (s.37), the power to order security for costs (s.38) and the power to dismiss claims in cases where there has been inordinate and inexcusable delay (s.41).

The Act makes it quite clear that international arbitral procedures taking place in London need not mirror English court procedures. It confirms that arbitrators are not obliged to apply English rules of evidence (s.34(2)(f)). In fact, the parties may dispense with them altogether. In addition, arbitrators may "take the initiative in ascertaining the facts and law" - a clear departure from the strictly adversarial nature of English court proceedings.


"An arbitration ... is a consensual process. ... Unless the public interest otherwise dictates, this has two main consequences. Firstly, the parties should be held to their agreement and secondly, it should in the first instance be for the parties to decide how their arbitration should be conducted." (Report of the Departmental Advisory Committee on International Law).

One important feature of the Act is the repeated emphasis of the principle of party autonomy. The parties to an arbitration in London will enjoy important new freedoms. They can decide what powers to give the arbitrators, whether the arbitrators should be persuaded to consolidate several arbitral proceedings and the laws which the arbitrators are to apply to the merits. Parties may even ask the arbitrators to rule on the basis of general principles of equity or their own subjective judgement of what is fair rather than on the basis of the strict letter of a national law.

The parties' freedom is perhaps best exemplified by the opportunity for them to opt out of many provisions of the Act. They may, for example, exclude any appeals on points of English law thereby ensuring the finality of the award (s.69).

As mentioned above, arbitrators have been given quite wide powers to determine procedure. However, it is important to bear in mind that the exercise of those powers is almost always subject to any agreement on such questions which the parties themselves may have reached.

If the parties fail to agree, the arbitrators may exercise their powers under the Act to determine procedure. The Act's emphasis upon party autonomy and the principles of efficiency, speed and cost -effectiveness means that the arbitrators will now be far less likely to fall back on English style court procedures. The Act requires them to determine procedure with a view to what is in the best interests of the parties.


"...our law has been subject to international criticism that the Courts intervene more than they should in the arbitral process [...]. The idea that the Court has some general supervisory jurisdiction over arbitrations has been abandoned." (Report of the Departmental Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law.)

If arbitration is to flourish as a distinct form of dispute resolution and if the principle of party autonomy is to be fully respected, private arbitrations should be kept as free as possible from court intervention. The Act achieves that goal. Appeals, time extensions and ancillary relief - three areas where the courts have traditionally become involved - illustrate the scope of the new reforms:


A right of appeal on a point of law has been retained. However, the occasions on which the court may be called on to intervene are severely restricted (s.69). In the first place, the possibility arises only where English law is applicable to the merits. In addition, parties will be free to exclude the right of appeal. In fact, any instruction by the parties that the arbitration tribunal need not give reasons for its award will be understood as an intention by them to exclude appeals on points of law. Other notable restrictions on this right of appeal are:

1) the point of law must have a substantial effect upon the rights of at least one of the parties, and
the point must be one that has been raised before the arbitral tribunal, and
2) on the basis of the facts decided by the tribunal, the court (when hearing an application for leave to appeal) must be satisfied, either:
(i) that the point of law obviously has been wrongly decided by the tribunal, or
(ii) that the issue is one of general public importance and there is a serious doubt as to whether the tribunal decided it correctly; and finally
3) the court must consider that it is just and proper to intervene.


In recent years it has become not uncommon for claimants to obtain a time extension from the English courts, thereby permitting the commencement of arbitration proceedings after the expiry of a contractual time-bar. Such extensions were granted under s.27 of the Arbitration Act 1950, which applied a test of "undue hardship". Claimants who had inadvertently failed to observe the contractual time-bar were often successful in obtaining a time extension. Under the Act (s.12), it will be much more difficult to obtain a time extension. The court will grant an extension only if:

  • the circumstances which have arisen were outside what the parties reasonably contemplated at the time the time-bar was agreed and it is just that time should be extended, or
  • the conduct of the other party makes it unjust to enforce the time-bar against the claimant.

In recent years, a large proportion of time extension applications have resulted simply from a claimant's inadvertent failure to give timely notice of arbitration. It is most unlikely that time extensions will be granted in such cases in future.


Of course, it is seldom desirable to exclude the jurisdiction of the courts completely. As the inherent jurisdiction of the courts is much wider than the powers of arbitrators, there will always be occasions when it may be called upon to assist the arbitral process by the appointment or replacement of arbitrators or by granting orders for ancillary relief. Such orders will now correctly be seen as an aid to arbitration rather than as an attempt to supervise or interfere with the arbitral process.

This extra-arbitral assistance is especially important in the area of urgent interim or conservatory measures since it can sometimes take some time to establish an arbitral tribunal. Section 44 of the Act provides that unless the parties have agreed to exclude the court's jurisdiction, the courts may, for example, make orders for:
  • the taking of evidence from witnesses;
  • the preservation of evidence;
  • the sale of goods; and
  • the granting of an interim injunction or the appointment of receivers.


" ... what is called for is ... a restatement of the law, in clear and 'user-friendly' language, following, as far as possible, the structure and spirit of the Model Law ..."(Interim Report of the Departmental Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law)

Whilst the Act is not an exhaustive code of English law relating to arbitrations, it does codify the leading principles extracted from existing legislation and case law. This makes English arbitration law more accessible than ever before to domestic and international users alike. In fact, the Act has been drafted to take account of the fact that foreign parties do not always have ready access to the reported decisions of the English courts.

The Act completely replaces all the pre-existing legislation and does so in remarkably clear and straightforward language. It is intended to be readily understood by all users including lawyers from diverse legal systems and by business people with no legal training.


The most obvious immediate effect of the Act is greatly to simplify English law. The Act brings English law up to date, in particular because it adopts large parts of the UNCITRAL Model Law which has been tried and tested in numerous other jurisdictions and has proved to be popular with international lawyers and business executives alike.

The new English law also allows arbitral tribunals henceforth to give full effect to the specialised rules of international arbitration institutions such as the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) whenever arbitrations conducted pursuant to such rules take place in London. The idea that the courts have a general right to supervise arbitrations has now been abandoned in English law. The parties - and arbitrators - have been given much greater powers to control their own procedures and to develop their arbitral process as a flexible, discrete and cost- effective form of dispute resolution.


Norton Rose's Arbitration Group comprises lawyers with wide-ranging experience of cases before various arbitration tribunals, including those established under the rules of the major international arbitration bodies, such as the ICC, the LCIA, the London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA), the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) as well as various professional, commodity and trade associations.

Members of the Norton Rose Arbitration Group are based in our offices in Paris, Hong Kong, Singapore, Bahrain, Piraeus and Moscow as well as in London. They work in a number of languages and are qualified and experienced in a broad variety of national legal systems, including those of both common law and civil law countries. Some partners sit as arbitrators in both international and domestic disputes. The firm is a member of the LCIA, the LMAA and the City Disputes Panel. Michael Lee, the Head of the Group, is a member of the UK National Committee of the ICC International Court of Arbitration and the ICC Commission on International Arbitration. In addition to conducting cases before arbitration tribunals, we also advise on the suitability and form of arbitration clauses in commercial contracts at the important drafting stage.

This note is intended to provide general information about some recent and anticipated developments which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive nor to provide any specific legal advice and should not be acted or relied upon as doing so. Professional advice appropriate to the specific situation should always be obtained.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.