UK: Avoiding Court Intervention In International Arbitrations

Last Updated: 15 July 1997

(First published in In House Lawyer, February 1997)

Lawyers and businessmen are frequently critical of judicial interference in arbitrations. There are many horror stories of arbitrations being delayed for years by parties fighting through the courts in an attempt to delay an inevitable result. It is therefore natural that one should hear calls for a quick fix solution - keep Judges out of arbitration. Here we consider whether this is desirable and whether, in English law, it is possible.

The history of English arbitration over the last 20 years is one of decreasing judicial interference. When the Arbitration Act 1996 comes into force at the end of January 1997 this process will have been taken a step further. This trend has been generally welcomed but the fact remains that it is extremely important that there should be some recourse to the courts if an arbitration clause is not to result in serious injustice or delay. The Act permits a degree of judicial involvement at each stage which is designed to make England an attractive venue for international arbitration.

Suppose parties to a contract set up an arrangement which effectively excludes all court interference. Some time later, one party wishes to start an arbitration. What happens if the mechanism for appointing the tribunal breaks down? Most sophisticated legal systems provide a procedure by which the court will assist in the appointment of arbitrators. Take another example. What happens if a vital piece of evidence is in the hands of a third party or the subject matter of the dispute is in third party hands and is about to be destroyed? The arbitrator has no jurisdiction over strangers to the contract and is therefore powerless. Only the court could intervene. Suppose the arbitrator accepts a bribe or is found to have a significant financial interest in the outcome but he refuses to withdraw. If the local court cannot interfere before an award is made, what is to stop such an award being enforced, at least in the country in which it was made?

These are just some problems which can arise if recourse to the courts is excluded altogether. An advocate of zero court involvement would argue that some of these problems can be dealt with at the enforcement stage. For instance, an award made by a corrupt or biased arbitrator would not be enforced in other countries which are signatories to the New York Convention. The courts of the country in which the arbitration took place might also refuse enforcement on public policy grounds even though those same courts could not have interfered during the arbitration. However, whilst there may be answers to some of these problems, the risk remains that without judicial support some arbitrations could never be started; others where vital evidence could not be brought before the arbitrator and others where the subject matter of the dispute could be lost.

For these reasons, the majority of practitioners favour a degree of judicial support while also criticising the excessive court involvement which used to characterise English arbitration law.

The remaining question considered in this article is whether the new Arbitration Act allows parties to an arbitration taking place in England to opt out of recourse to the courts completely.

Many provisions of the Arbitration Act 1996 can be disapplied by agreement. Some cannot. Those provisions which are mandatory are helpfully gathered together in Schedule 1 of the Act (see box). These mandatory provisions apply where the seat of the arbitration is in England and Wales and would not apply if the seat was in, say, France. However, even in those circumstances, there is a residual category of powers vested in the English courts which are always available and which the parties cannot disapply by agreement. That category comprises the English court's powers to stay English proceedings where there is an arbitration agreement covering the dispute, the court's power to grant leave for an award to be enforced as if it were a judgement of the court and the power to grant subpoenas. Those are absolute powers always available to the English court irrespective of any contrary agreement and wherever the legal place of the arbitration.

Let us now return to those mandatory provisions in Schedule 1 which are not included in the short list of core powers which apply wherever the arbitration is taking place. Can the parties effectively avoid those provisions in relation to an arbitration taking place in England by specifying that the seat of the arbitration is elsewhere? The answer appears to be that they can. Section 3 of the new Act seems to provide that if the parties agree that the seat of the arbitration is, say, in Paris, then that choice has effect. The fact that the arbitration takes place exclusively in London (perhaps even between two English parties and relating exclusively to English subject matter) seems to make no difference. Quite why parties should wish to do this might be open to question. However, 'the less judicial intervention the better' remains a commonly held view, especially where sovereign powers are involved. An artificially designated seat does seem to be a possible way of achieving this.

Of course, if the parties nominate a foreign seat for their arbitration which will take place in London, they could find themselves subjecting the arbitration to the potential scrutiny of the courts in the country of that seat. That may be a case of out of the frying pan and into the fire. That leads to another thought. Can the parties nominate as the seat of their arbitration a place which is outside any court's jurisdiction? Perhaps a specified location in outer space? The report of the Departmental Advisory Committee on the Arbitration Bill chaired by Lord Justice Saville recommended that English law should not recognise the concept of an arbitration without a seat. To nominate as a seat a place which is outside any court's jurisdiction would, if valid, circumvent that objective. There must therefore be a real possibility that a choice of that kind would, in English law, be ineffective.

Even if such an artificial choice is possible under English law, there are doubts over the enforceability of the resulting award. In one of the best known delocalised arbitrations, British Petroleum Company (Libya) Limited v Libyan Arab Republic (1980) Yearbook of Commercial Arbitration, 143,147, the arbitrator, Lagergren J commented that 'the effectiveness of an arbitral award that lacks nationality...generally is smaller than that of an award founded on the procedural law of a specific legal system and partaking of its nationality.' In his published doctoral thesis on the New York Convention, Albert Jan van den Berg expresses the view that most countries would refuse to recognise and enforce a national award.

One final (and slightly frivolous) point. If the determined 'zero interventionist' is still not deterred from trying an artificial choice of seat in order to avoid English court intervention despite all the above, he may be wise not to select a point in outer space. Article II of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activity of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 1967 prevents signatory states from claiming sovereignty over the moon and other points in outer space. However, it is clear from the wording of the treaty that this does not preclude the acceptance of jurisdiction by national courts in respect of activities taking place in outer space. Therefore, to conduct an arbitration in outer space, even hypothetically, might result in a number of national courts being willing to accept jurisdiction over the arbitration procedures!

In conclusion, it is believed that the new English Arbitration Act strikes a fair balance between the authority of arbitrators on the one hand and an assurance of sufficient judicial support to avoid injustice on the other. The Act allows a substantial measure of freedom for the parties to contract out but reserves a small core of powers to the courts in all cases. There is some scope for the determined anti-interventionist draftsman for seeking to avoid the non-core powers set out in Schedule 1. However, for the reasons discussed in this article, there are real risks involved in trying to avoid those powers by the selection of a seat of the arbitration outside England and Wales if the intention is that the arbitration should, in fact, take place there. There are even greater dangers in attempting to delocalise the arbitration or to designate as the seat of the arbitration a place beyond the reach of any court.

Provisions of the 1996 Act which are mandatory if the seat is in England & Wales

Section

*Stay of legal proceedings 9-11

Extension of time limits 12

Application of Limitation Acts 13

Removal of arbitrators 24

Death of arbitrators 26

Fees of arbitrators 28

Immunity of arbitrators 29

Objections to jurisdiction 31

Preliminary jurisdiction points 32

General duties of arbitrators 33

Expenses of arbitrators 37(2)

General duties of the parties 40

*Attendance of witnesses 43

Withholding award against fees 56

Orders for costs 60

*Enforcement of award 66

Challenging the award 67-71

Persons not participating in arbitration 72

Loss of right to object 73

Immunity of arbitral institutions 74

Charge in respect of solicitors' costs 75

*Provisions which are mandatory wherever the seat.

 

This note is intended to provide general information about some recent and anticipated developments which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive nor to provide any specific legal advice and should not be acted or relied upon as doing so. Professional advice appropriate to the specific situation should always be obtained.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions