UK: The Patents Game: How Strong Is Your Hand?

Last Updated: 19 June 2008
Article by Paul D. Cozens

The Trading Technologies (TT) and E-Speed court case is a timely reminder of the importance and potential value (or cost) of patents in the financial sector. The US Court found that E-Speed had infringed TT's patents covering its X Trader order entry platform, and awarded damages of $3.5m. Currently, four other ISVs – GL Trade, Rosenthal Collins Group, CQG and Futurespath – are still in dispute.

TT and E-Speed have obtained millions of dollars in royalties in recent years from patents in relation to electronic trading systems in particular. Both hold granted patents across the globe.

It seems that many of the patent cards in the derivatives area that will dominate the next decade have already been dealt. Those with a poor hand risk losing out: fortunately, there are steps that financial institutions can take firstly to reduce exposure to claims for patent infringement, and secondly to obtain patent protection for their own innovations so as to strengthen market position and generate additional revenues through licensing.

Increase In International Patent Applications

Today's economy is becoming increasingly knowledge-based and intellectual property, particularly in the form of patents, plays a vital role in protecting this knowledge. Companies are realising the importance and economic impact of patenting their innovations. This can be seen for example in the significant rise of International patent filings over the last 15 years (see figure one).

Figure One:

IP In Derivatives

Back in 1998, the State Street Bank decision affirmed that so-called "business method" inventions are patentable in the US, provided the invention produces a "useful, concrete and tangible result". This led to greatly increased numbers of patents being filed in the financial sector.

With electronic trading superseding open outcry in many areas of derivatives trading, patenting the associated technology (e.g. exchange trading systems, algorithmic trading models, and so on) has become de rigeur for a number of ISVs and US investment banks. TT, E-Speed and Goldman Sachs all have significant patent positions, with well over 100 patents and applications apiece.

Trading Technologies v E-Speed

One of the aces in TT's deck is of course the patent rights it asserts covering its X Trader order entry platform. When, back in 2004, TT took out a full page advertisement declaring that it required for its patented technology a 2.5 cents royalty for each applicable future and option transaction, permanently, it was game on.

TT began numerous infringement proceedings. Many were settled out of court and some ended in substantial royalties being paid. E-Speed, with its own rival patented technology, and buoyed by previous success against New York Mercantile Exchange with its Wagner patent, took a more resolute stance. TT consequently sued E-Speed for infringement of two of its US patents relating to its static price ladder.

The first round seemed to go E-Speed's way. In a summary judgment the court interpreted the TT patents more narrowly than TT was urging, with the effect that E-Speed's latest versions of its product did not infringe. However, the case proceeded to full judgment to decide upon validity and further counts of infringement.

In their October 10 2007 decision, the jury's verdict was that the TT patents are valid, and that E-Speed infringed those two patents for a period of six months or so during 2004. The jury awarded TT $3.5 million in damages. Critically, it found that E-Speed had wilfully infringed and consequently, the judge can award up to three times the $3.5 million amount.

So where to next with the litigation? E-Speed has filed a charge of inequitable conduct against TT, alleging it committed fraud or did not disclose required information in the pursuit of the patents. If E-Speed succeeds, the patents may be rendered unenforceable. Whatever that outcome, E-Speed will no doubt appeal the existing finding against it. Equally, it is likely that TT will cross-appeal against the summary judgment of non-infringement.

TT and E-Speed's battle is set to continue for some time to come, both in the US and elsewhere. TT have inter alia a granted European patent, which on paper is broader than the equivalent US patent. However, there are a number of oppositions to the European patent. Whether these will be successful, and what activities might infringe the patent, are issues that will be decided afresh in Europe, with little or no heed being paid by the European courts to the position in the US. Patent law and practice in Europe are quite different to that in the US in a number of key respects.

What's The Risk?

Figure Two shows the increasing number of US patents granted in the derivatives area over the last 10 years. Even though the graph rises dramatically from 2005, the way US patents are classified means the estimated numbers still represent a conservatively low estimate of the likely actual numbers.

Figure Two:

Investigations suggest a further continued increase in the number of granted patents. This indicates a new era in derivatives in which those players that have protected their innovations appropriately will likely be at a significant advantage.

One way to leverage that advantage is through licensing. E-Speed has reportedly generated licensing revenues in excess of $50 million for its Wagner patent alone.

However, it cannot be assumed that patent holders will necessarily agree to license their patents. With some exceptions, a granted patent affords the patentee an exclusive right. Backed up by the powerful teeth of the Court, a patentee can obtain a final injunction preventing its competitors from using the patented technology.

And a final injunction, obtained at the successful outcome of a trial, is not the patentee's only trump card. In many cases, an interim injunction is available, even before the merits of the matter have been decided, preventing use of the alleged infringing product until the final decision of the court is handed down. Such interim injunctions can in the extreme be awarded within hours of the alleged infringement coming to light. The effect is often sufficient to put alleged infringers out of business.

While some players have dealt themselves a strong hand with their patent protection, many others - notably European companies - have not yet entered the game at all, or have entered with little appetite.

Part of the reason for this seems to be a belief, more common in Europe than in the US, that little or no derivatives technology is patentable. Such a belief is largely unfounded, although it is certainly true that the statutory exclusions from patentability in Europe mean that patent protection needs to be obtained with great care; only a relatively few European Patent Attorneys are geared up to operate in this area.

Another factor seems to be a desire to await the outcome of the TT v E-Speed litigation before embarking on building a patent portfolio. But there is an irony here: whatever the outcome, the litigation has already demonstrated the importance of patents in derivatives, and every day that goes by with their competitors refraining from protecting their technology is another day for both TT and E-Speed to achieve further patent dominance.

How Can The Risk Be Mitigated?

"Unless a company has strong intellectual property, it will be unable to compete" – TT, Jan 9 2006

Schiff Hardin LLP attorney Stacie Hartman (who represented Peregrine Financial Group, a brokerage firm that settled a suit filed by TT similar to that filed against E-Speed) says that the case emphasises the need for futures industry professionals to document and protect their ideas as well as the process of their creation. "Before launching any new product or trading system, consider what patents are already out there, to make sure you're not infringing them. But also consider them offensively – maybe your own work is entitled to protection by patents or other IP."

There are two key (and complementary) ways to mitigate risks:

  1. Assess Your Competitors' Patents

One prevailing view, most notably in Europe, is that it is risky to search for and investigate competitors' patents. The argument runs as follows:-

  • A patent search would be expected to find US patents that might be infringed
  • If notwithstanding the search results you proceed with an infringing product, you are being "wilful"
  • If you are being wilful, you are liable for treble damages in the US

The August 2007 Seagate1 decision in the US affirms that such an approach is inadvisable. Quite apart from raising the bar for proving wilful infringement, the Court suggested that a competitor launching a product in the US should be expected to have knowledge of the patent risks. Deliberately closing one's eyes to the risks might itself – ironically – be wilful. It would also be short-sighted: given the globalisation of the financial sector a company that finds itself unable to commercialize its technology in the US will be at an increasing disadvantage.

Responsible companies are advised to conduct professional quality patent searches and investigations, with the aim of adopting a properly considered strategy towards third party patents, proportionate to the perceived risks.

  1. Build Your Own Patent Position

Even if you do not wish to use patents aggressively they still provide cards to play if you are being pursued for infringement.

A first step might be to have an IP audit carried out by a Patent Attorney, typically covering areas such as:

  • Algorithmic trading models
  • Electronic trading systems / GUIs
  • Front / middle / back office systems
  • Business methodology
  • Trade marks
  • Trade secrets

Alongside this it might be appropriate to increase the level of IP awareness within your organisation by bringing in specialist IP training. Awareness is key to identifying and capturing innovation.

Seeking good, early and creative professional advice will ensure that the best value will be derived from your innovations.

It Pays To Remember:

  • Create internal procedures to help identify and capture new processes and systems which may be capable of patent protection
  • Never publicly disclose your invention before filing a patent application
  • File as early as possible – remember, if you do not protect your inventions you are effectively donating them to the public when you go to market
  • Never assume that an idea is not patentable – this is a question for the experts
  • Generally, a separate patent is required for each country where protection is needed (ie patents are territorial)
  • Patent rights have a finite term (usually 20 years)
  • A patent starts life as a pending application and grants later: it is generally only after grant that a patent can be litigated
  • Whatever commercial activity you undertake, you are statistically highly likely to be infringing at least one patent – so take the time to educate yourself as to the risks


1. CAFC Misc. Docket No. 830 (20 August 2007)

This article first appeared in "Futures and Options World"

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions