UK: Fraud In Civil Claims - A Rare Judgment

Allegations of fraud in civil claims under English law are not often actively pursued and rarely succeed.

However, in the case of Celtic Bioenergy Limited v Knowles Limited [2017], the judge decided that an arbitrator's award had been obtained by fraud, in the civil not the criminal sense, on the part of Knowles.

The case also illustrates that even where the parties have selected arbitration as the forum for the resolution of their disputes, there is no guarantee that the privacy considered to be one of the advantages of arbitration over litigation will be maintained, as an arbitrator's award can be challenged in the English Courts.

The factual background

This decision arose from Celtic's application to set aside, vary or remit an arbitrator's award on the grounds of serious irregularity in that it was obtained by fraud or in a manner contrary to public policy.

As the judge, Mrs Justice Jefford, highlighted in her judgment, the background to this application was "complex and convoluted".

  1. Devon County Council engaged Celtic to design and construct a composting facility;
  2. Disputes arose between Devon and Celtic about payment, some of which were dealt with in eight adjudications followed by an arbitration;
  3. Celtic engaged Knowles to provide advice and to represent it both in the adjudications and in the arbitration;
  4. By what the judge described as a "rather curious set of documents", Celtic later assigned to Knowles its rights against Devon, but at the same time reserved the right to enforce payment or to claim damages. Celtic also entered into a side letter which provided that any sums obtained by Knowles would be held for Celtic's benefit, less any sums due to Knowles as fees;
  5. Knowles subsequently issued to Devon invoices in respect of the sums awarded to Celtic in adjudication number eight, but Devon refused to pay;
  6. In the meantime, disputes arose between Celtic and Knowles about Knowles' entitlement to payment for the services it had provided in adjudications six, seven and eight and the quality of the services provided;
  7. Celtic and Knowles entered into an ad hoc arbitration agreement subject to English law which provided that all disputes between them would be resolved by arbitration; and, importantly, that Knowles would withdraw and extinguish the invoices it had served on Devon;
  8. Thereafter, separate arbitrations were commenced between Devon and Celtic, and also between Celtic and Knowles;
  9. The arbitrator in the arbitration between Celtic and Knowles decided in a partial award on initial issues, that fees would be payable to Knowles, but he did not decide (because he was not asked to), whether any sums were actually payable to Knowles at that time;
  10. The arbitrator later made a further award in which he decided that Knowles was liable for the costs of determining the initial issues and later ordered that Knowles pay Celtic £200,000 on account of these costs;
  11. Without Celtic's knowledge, in March 2016, Knowles wrote to Devon to demand payment of the sum of £377,985.50 plus VAT, which included the sums that had been the subject of the invoices Knowles had withdrawn. Again, Devon did not pay;
  12. In April 2016, Knowles attempted to commence a further arbitration against Celtic in which it claimed £2 million, as damages for breach of contract, for its fees relating to the services it had provided to Celtic in the arbitration between Celtic and Devon;
  13. Knowles then made applications for declarations in its arbitration with Celtic that it had complied with its agreement with Celtic to withdraw the invoices it had submitted to Devon. This led to a further arbitration award made in September 2016, which in turn led to Celtic's application now before the Technology and Construction Court;
  14. In the September 2016 award, the arbitrator declared that Knowles had complied with the ad hoc arbitration agreement between it and Celtic by withdrawing the invoices it had served on Devon, but in making that declaration, he was crucially not aware of the March 2016 demand for payment Knowles had submitted to Devon. It was only after the making of the September 2016 award that the March 2016 demand and subsequent related correspondence came to the attention of Celtic.

The legal principles and the court's decision

The question for the judge to decide was whether the evidence Knowles had presented to the arbitrator in the 2016 arbitration was, as Celtic claimed, incomplete, misleading and fraudulent.

The starting point is section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, which provides that:

"(1) A party to arbitral proceedings may...apply to the court challenging an award...on the ground of serious irregularity affecting the tribunal, the proceedings or the award.

(2) Serious irregularity means an irregularity of one or more of the following kinds which the court considers has caused or will cause substantial injustice to the applicant-...

(g) the award being obtained by fraud or the way in which it was procured being contrary to public policy..."

In the course of her judgment the judge emphasised that:

  1. The threshold for any challenge under section 68 is high; and "...it is not sufficient to show that one party inadvertently misled the other, however carelessly...There must be some form of dishonest, reprehensible or unconscionable conduct that has contributed in a substantial way to obtaining the award...";
  2. It is not enough for the court to surmise that there had been fraud, but that "...does not mean that anything short of an admission of fraud will do. The court is entitled, in the normal way, to reach a conclusion on all of the evidence available to it..."  Therefore a finding of fraud, in the civil context, can be made on the basis of inferences from the evidence if the evidence is strong enough;
  3. The court will also bear in mind "...what is sometimes referred to as the higher standard of proof on an allegation of fraud. By this what is meant is not that the standard is something different from the balance of probabilities but rather that the explanation is more likely to be human error than dishonesty";
  4. It is also not enough to show that the award was obtained by fraud or in a way contrary to public policy; it must also have caused substantial injustice. "Amongst other things, the applicant must show that the true position or the absence of the fraud would probably have affected the outcome of the arbitration in a significant respect".

Applying the legal principles to the facts, the judge concluded that:

  1. Knowles' failure to draw its March 2016 correspondence with Devon (which was plainly relevant to the issues under consideration) to the attention of the arbitrator was deliberate, and in failing to do so, Knowles had created a "...wholly misleading impression". Knowles had failed to provide a credible explanation for this failure;
  2. In the circumstances, it was not necessary for her to decide whether or not Knowles had been reckless in failing to draw the March 2016 correspondence to the attention of the arbitrator (in the sense that it did not care about the veracity of the statements made to the arbitrator concerning compliance with certain provisions in the ad hoc arbitration agreement between Knowles and Celtic); but she said (without deciding the point) that "...there may be cases in which recklessness as to whether a statement was true or false might amount to fraud within the meaning of s.68(2)(g) if there is some other element of unconscionable conduct";
  3. Knowles had obtained the arbitrator's September 2016 award by fraud "...in that matters that were completely inconsistent with key issues in Knowles' case were deliberately withheld from the arbitrator".

Mrs Justice Jefford remitted the parts of the award that Celtic had challenged back to the arbitrator so that he could reconsider his award in possession of the full facts.

Key points to remember

This decision illustrates and emphasises the importance of not withholding key information from an arbitrator as it might result in (a) awards being set aside, varied or remitted to an arbitrator by an English Court that has jurisdiction; and (b) "private" arbitration awards coming into the public domain if they are challenged by a dissatisfied party on the grounds of serious irregularity.

The decision also illustrates and re-affirms the well-established principle that the English Courts will not interfere with an arbitration award on the grounds of serious irregularity unless there is a very clear basis for doing so.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Edmonds Marshall McMahon
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Edmonds Marshall McMahon
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions