UK: Barristers´ Liability - The Current Landscape

Last Updated: 25 February 2008
Article by Richard Harrison and James Taylor

Originally published in BLG Lawyers' Liability Briefing: Issue 22.

In Awoyomi v Radford (2007) the defendant barrister relied on immunity from suit in a criminal matter because the relevant events all took place in 1995, well before the House of Lords ruled on abolition.

The court rejected this argument on the basis that the Lords in Hall had concluded that the change in the law to remove immunity from suit applied retrospectively to the conduct that formed the subject of the appeals, which had occurred in 1991. Further, there was nothing in the judgment of the majority to suggest that the abolition of immunity should be applied to a more recent date for criminal proceedings than for civil proceedings. As the relevant acts in Awoyomi had occurred in 1995, by which time barristers no longer enjoyed immunity, the barrister could not rely on this defence.

It appears, therefore, that as from 1991 at least, it was no longer justifiable to rely on immunity from suit and that any defence based on immunity would fail if the events in question took place after that time. Whether immunity remains for claims involving events pre-dating 1991 is uncertain.

From our experience, Hall has not opened the floodgates to more claims being made against barristers. However, there have been claims made against barristers that once might have been thought to be hopeless.

The courts have also had to grapple with the extent of responsibility counsel should bear in relation to advice given at the courtroom door, including where both solicitors and counsel are in the firing line.

In Moy v Pettman Smith (2005), for example, the barrister's advice at the door of the court was alleged to have been negligent. The barrister had advised the claimant to reject a Part 36 offer of £150,000 on the ground that he should beat it and he would be better off proceeding with the action. The barrister did not add that her chances of persuading the court to admit key evidence that would increase the value of the claim was only 50:50. Without this evidence, the existing offer was a reasonable one. The court did not admit the evidence, the claimant was no longer able to accept the Part 36 offer and he had to accept a smaller amount.

The Court of Appeal found that the barrister's advice was not negligent. However, she had negligently failed to give more detailed advice. In particular, she should have given more detailed advice on the chances of getting the key evidence admitted. The House of Lords agreed with the Court of Appeal that the advice itself was not negligent. However, unlike the Court of Appeal, it did not consider that she was negligent for failing to "spell out" her advice to the claimant.

A crucial factor was that both the Court of Appeal and House of Lords recognised that the difficulties and pressures on a barrister advising at the door of the court "can be heavy" and "in such circumstances it would be surprising if every piece of such advice were reasoned with as much comprehensive precision as may be applied in hindsight by an appellate tribunal which has the benefit of extensive argument and leisurely reflection." Lord Hope added that "...Judges need to be careful lest the decision in the case depends on the standard they would set for themselves. If this were to happen, it would vary from judge to judge and become arbitrary."

It is encouraging to note that judges recognise that they have to steer away from reflecting on what they themselves might have done, often with the bright beam of hindsight, and focus instead on what a reasonably competent barrister or solicitor would have done in the same circumstances.

It is frequently the case that claims against barristers will also include a claim against the instructing solicitor. These claims often give rise to a debate on the extent to which the solicitor is entitled to rely on the barrister's advice to escape liability.

In Regent Leisuretime Ltd v Skerrett (2006), the solicitor sought specialist advice from the barrister in a potential claim against a bank for fraudulent misrepresentation. The court confirmed that a solicitor is entitled to rely on a barrister's advice when properly instructed, although the solicitor cannot rely on the advice without exercising his own independent judgement. The more specialist the field, the more reasonable it will be for the solicitor to accept and act upon the barrister's advice although, even then, if the solicitor is also a specialist in the field, it is less likely that it is reasonable for the solicitor to rely on the advice without exercising his own independent judgement. In Leisuretime, the court found that it was reasonable for the solicitor to rely on counsel's advice because it was in a specialist field.

However, in Hickman v Blake Lapthorn (2006), the claimant instructed the solicitor in relation to his claim for damages against the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) for a severe head injury arising out of a motor accident involving an uninsured driver. The solicitor instructed the barrister to advise on liability, and he was given copies of the claimant's medical reports. The solicitor had no previous experience of valuing serious head injury claims but had studied the medical reports in detail. These medical reports suggested that his future employment prospects could be limited due to his injuries. The claimant agreed to have a split trial on liability. At the door of the court, the MIB offered the claimant £70,000. The barrister had not considered fully the value of the claim but he advised the claimant to accept the offer. He calculated that it was a generous one. However, this calculation appears to have been made on the assumption that the claimant would return to full time employment. However, when he was unable to return to work, the claimant brought a claim against both solicitor and barrister on the basis that neither had taken into account the possibility that he would not work again. He said he would not have accepted the offer had he been advised of the potential size of his claim.

The court held that the barrister should have been familiar with the medical reports and should not have advised on settlement until he was. His decision was not an error of judgement, as further enquiry would have revealed the full situation, which would have then had an impact on the advice given. He also held that it was the solicitor's duty to intervene, and she had breached her duties as a solicitor by failing to alert the barrister to the possibility that the claimant may not have been able to return to full time employment. However, the fact that the barrister was more senior, had greater experience and he led the valuation of the claim, led to liability apportioned as two thirds to the barrister and one third to the solicitor.

This finding is consistent with the accepted position that even in a specialist sphere, if the barrister's advice is based on the wrong facts the solicitor cannot expect to escape liability if he or she is aware of the error.

Most recently, in Pritchard Joyce and Hinds v Batcup (2008), in which the solicitors were awarded a 75 per cent contribution from counsel to a settlement they had made to the client who had sued for failure to advise on an action within the limitation period, the court held that whilst the causal contributions of solicitors and counsel were equal, counsel should bear a greater extent of the responsibility. The relationship was one where the solicitors looked to counsel for guidance on the key strategic issues concerning the conduct of the litigation.

In summary, it appears to us that, whilst the floodgates have not opened, barristers are facing claims that once might have been considered to be covered by immunity. In addition, it appears that, increasingly, the courts are being required to consider the role played by barristers and the division of responsibility in claims where solicitors are also sued.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.