European Union: Kit Kat Shape Mark: Has The EU General Court Pre-Judged The UK Court Of Appeal?

Last Updated: 15 February 2017
Article by Christopher Benson and Roland Mallinson

We have previously reported on the challenges by Mondolez/Cadbury to Nestlé's four-fingered Kit Kat shape trade mark – see here and here.

The parties initially clashed about this more than 10 years ago before the German trade mark registry and the German courts. That skirmish was settled and the battle ground in the EU has shifted to the EUIPO and to the UK registry, with appeals from both their decisions. Until now, Nestlé has had the upper hand in the former but not the latter. However, its success in the EUIPO has been reversed with a decision of the EU General Court. Even so, the decision has potentially beneficial ramifications for Nestlé's parallel case pending before English Court of Appeal. The hearing for that is in the next few months.

The decision

The General Court's key decision related to the perceived geographic inadequacy of Nestlé's proof of acquired distinctiveness. When Nestlé filed its EU trade mark application there were only 15 EU Member States. The General Court disagreed with the EUIPO Board of Appeal that it was enough to prove acquired distinctiveness in 10 of those 15 countries. This was notwithstanding that those 10 represented 90% of the then EU's total population, of whom almost 50% immediately identified trade origin from the Kit Kat shape. However, because the Board of Appeal had not reached a conclusion on whether there was sufficient proof for Belgium, Ireland, Greece and Portugal (or Luxembourg but not mentioned by the General Court), distinctiveness had not been proven "throughout the EU."

The case now goes back to the EUIPO to review the evidence for those five countries again. There was no survey evidence of brand awareness or market share figures for some of them (and no figures relating to use in Luxembourg at all). That alone does not mean the proof there is inadequate but Nestlé's optimism may be tempered by the fact that the Cancellation Division's ruling, at first instance, was that the overall evidence was clearly not sufficient for those countries. Indeed, it even ruled that it was also inadequate in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Austria but at least the Board of Appeal reversed those rulings.

This part of the decision sets a high threshold for marks used on a pan-EU basis. It is hard to reconcile with the seemingly more practical approach adopted by the CJEU in Chocoladefabriken Lindt (C-98/11). That had concluded that it was unreasonable to require such evidence for every single Member State where the mark was inherently non-distinctive. It was enough that acquired distinctiveness is "sufficiently" proved in quantitative terms (other cases had ruled that sufficient evidence for four or even 15 out of 27 Members States was definitely not enough). The General Court reminds us that the threshold is not applying to a substantial proportion of all EU citizens together but rather to a significant proportion of consumers "throughout the EU". It means a lack of recognition in one EU country cannot be offset by a higher level of awareness in others.

Other lessons to learn

The General Court's decision is helpful in clarifying a number of points relating to the gathering and submission of evidence of acquired distinctiveness:

  • Just because a sign (e.g. the shape) has always been used with other branding elements (e.g. a name) does not mean the evidence of past use necessarily relates to both that sign and those other branding combined – there can still be trade mark use of just the sign despite the presence of other elements.
  • Survey questions that depict the sign applied for without the other branding elements is good evidence to prove acquired distinctiveness of the sign alone (even if the historic use has never been in such an unbranded form) – it is not necessary to do a survey using a sign combined with some other (maybe invented) branding as an experimental control.
  • The evidence that was most convincing in each country was survey evidence combined with market share information for that country, in both cases as obtained by independent market research specialists.
  • Evidence of turnover and advertising spend, being internal data, is secondary evidence but does not, alone, prove acquired distinctive character – if relying on the latter, it helps to show the share of those costs relatively to the total advertising spend in that market.
  • The fact that third parties may have other goods identical or similar in shape on the market is irrelevant if the evidence still nevertheless shows that there is acquired distinctiveness for that shape.
  • It is not essential for proving acquired distinctiveness that a product's shape has been apparent at the time of sale or on its packaging – evidence of the shape featuring in advertisements or of being visible at the point of consumption can potentially suffice.
  • Any decision of a national IPO about the sufficiency of evidence of acquired distinctiveness in that country is not binding on the EUIPO even if relating to the same evidence.

What next?

As part of its analysis, the General Court expressly ruled that Nestlé's evidence proved that the shape had acquired distinctiveness in the UK. This is contrary to the findings of the UKIPO and Arnold J in the English High Court. It also rejected Mondolez's submission that consumers only identify a Kit Kat because of the name on the packaging and the product, and that the mark registered merely represents the shape of the product known as "Kit Kat 4 fingers".

Whilst these findings of fact are not binding per se on the English Court of Appeal, they are highly pertinent to Nestlé's imminent appeal before it. This is especially so since the General Court also felt compelled to point out that the CJEU had not adopted Arnold J's formulation (in his referring question to the CJEU), whereby the relevant consumer must be shown to "rely" on the shape to identify the commercial origin of the goods. Despite this, when the case came back before him, Arnold J had ruled against Nestlé by effectively applying his reliance (a "because of") test nevertheless. He rejected Nestlé's UK evidence with that in mind. Since the English and the EUIPO cases have been considering largely the same evidence insofar as it relates to the UK, it is hard to see how the Court of Appeal can ignore the views of the General Court about that evidence and about the CJEU's rejection of Arnold J's reliance test.

So the General Court's decision would seem to bode well for Nestlé's UK registration. It could also pave the way for Nestlé, as a fall back, to convert its EU trade mark into national marks in each of the countries where the General Court ruled the evidence was sufficient, namely France, Italy, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Austria.

If this number of national rights could survive the fallout in any event, one might reasonably question why Mondolez would want to continue challenging the EU trade mark. The answer may lie in the expansion of the EU since Nestlé's application. Had Nestlé been able to show distinctiveness in just those five additional countries (the four listed and Luxembourg), it would now have a monopoly right in its shape in not 15 but 28 Member States. This is despite the fact that Nestlé had not proved acquired distinctiveness in 13 of these countries and, for all we know, had not even used the mark there. Those 13 new Member States represent an additional 125 million consumers (about 30% more than the original EU trade mark would have covered). This is likely to mean the Kit Kat saga will continue for a while yet.

Case T-112/13

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Brodies LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Brodies LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions