European Union: EU Court Defines Scope Of Legal Privilege In Antitrust Probes - In-House Counsel Documents Not Protected

Last Updated: 19 December 2007
Article by John Pheasant and Hector Armengod

Summary

The European Court of First Instance (CFI) has handed down its much awaited ruling in the Akzo case1, which is of particular importance for in-house lawyers and antitrust practitioners as it clarifies the scope of legal professional privilege in the context of a Commission antitrust investigation. The judgment confirms the Commission’s view that documents created by inhouse counsel, whether or not they are members of a bar, are in principle not subject to legal privilege and can be viewed and read by Commission officials in an investigation under EC law. The CFI’s judgment also provides a valuable clarification of the procedure which the Commission must follow when dealing with documents found during an investigation and for which privilege is claimed but disputed by the Commission.

Privilege: The Essentials

The CFI confirmed its ruling in the AM & S2 case:

  • Requests for advice to, and advice from, external counsel qualified to practice in an EEA country are privileged if made for the purposes, and in the interests, of the company’s rights of defense. This protection extends to such communications after the Commission has initiated proceedings which may lead to a decision under Articles 81 or 82 EC and also to such communications which pre-date the initiation of proceedings, providing that they relate to the same subject matter.
  • Internal communications reporting privileged advice of external counsel are also privileged, but probably not any commentary on such advice by in-house counsel or other employees of the company.

Requests for advice to, and advice from, in-house counsel are not privileged.

The Facts

The case resulted from a dawn raid carried out by Commission officials, assisted by representatives of the UK Office of Fair Trading (OFT), in the Manchester premises of an Akzo subsidiary. During the inspection, a dispute arose between the Commission officials and company representatives as to the privileged nature of a number of documents. The documents in question were briefly examined by the official leading the investigation team, who classified them in two different groups:

  • The Set A documents, which consisted of a type-written memorandum from the general manager of the subsidiary, in whose premises the investigation was taking place, to his superiors, and of a copy of this memorandum with hand-written notes giving the name of Akzo’s external competition lawyer. The memorandum contained information gathered by the company for the purpose of obtaining external legal assistance in relation to a competition law compliance program. The Commission’s team was uncertain about the status of the Set A documents, took copies of them and placed the copies in a sealed envelope.
  • The Set B documents, which consisted of hand-written notes made by the subsidiary’s general manager, in preparation of the Set A memorandum, and of two emails exchanged between the general manager and Akzo’s in-house lawyer who was a member of the Netherlands bar association. The Commission officials did not consider that these documents were privileged and consequently made copies of them and placed the copies in a file with all the other documents obtained during the raid.

Akzo contested the Commission’s handling of both sets of documents claiming that both were covered by legal privilege and asked for the copies to be returned or destroyed. The Commission rejected Akzo’s request by way of a formal decision. This decision, together with the Commission’s decision authorizing the dawn raid, were the object of the CFI’s ruling.

Scope Of Legal Privilege

The CFI considered whether each set of documents was covered by privilege and concluded that:

  • The Set A documents were not privileged. As a general rule, the CFI considers that documents are privileged if they originate from an independent lawyer and are drafted for the purpose of exercising the client’s right of defense. Additionally, internal notes reporting the content of communications with external counsel or preparatory documents which are meant to be sent to external counsel can also be covered by legal privilege. Finally, preparatory documents which are not meant to be sent to external counsel may also enjoy legal privilege if they have been created with the purpose of seeking legal advice from an external lawyer in the exercise of a company’s right of defense. According to the CFI, the scope of the latter category of documents must be interpreted narrowly. The CFI concluded that the fact that a document is drawn up within the framework of a competition compliance program is not sufficient to confer privilege on it. According to the CFI, compliance programs often include information which goes beyond the exercise of the rights of defense. The CFI concluded that the Set A documents were not drafted for the purpose of exercising Akzo’s rights of defense, and were therefore not privileged.
  • The Set B documents were also not considered to be covered by privilege. The handwritten notes made in preparation of the Set A memorandum were evidently not privileged since the memorandum itself was not privileged. Finally, with regard to the e-mails exchanged with the in-house counsel, the CFI re-confirmed its position in the AM & S case that communications with in-house counsel do not enjoy legal privilege. The CFI also concluded that the concept of legal privilege under EC competition law is distinct from similar concepts in the different legal systems of the EU Member States. Therefore, the legal privilege enjoyed by an in-house counsel under national law cannot be used as a shield in a Commission antitrust investigation, but could possibly be relied on in an investigation by a national competition authority under Member State competition laws. It is questionable, however, whether in-house counsel privilege, when recognized by national law, can be relied upon in an investigation by national authorities of a breach of EC law. This question is particularly relevant following the modernization of EC competition law with the adoption of Regulation 1/2003 under which national competition authorities have full power to investigate and enforce Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty.

Procedure

While endorsing the Commission’s assessment of the non-privileged nature of the disputed documents, the CFI criticized the Commission’s handling of these documents during the investigation. In its ruling, quoting from AM & S, the CFI lays down the procedure that the Commission must follow when the privileged character of materials found during an investigation is disputed. This procedure consists of the following three steps:

  1. When legal privilege is disputed, the investigated company must provide the Commission with evidence that demonstrates that the conditions for privilege are met (e.g. who drafted the document and to whom was it addressed, the purpose for which the document was drafted, etc.), but is not obliged to disclose the information contained in the document.
  2. If the Commission is not satisfied with this explanation, it must order the production of those documents by way of a formal decision.
  3. Finally, the investigated company has the right to challenge this decision before the CFI. The Commission is only entitled to read the disputed document once the deadline for bringing an action before the CFI has expired. The company can, however, make an application for interim measures preventing the Commission from reading the document until judgment in the main action is rendered by the CFI.

The CFI also stated that, during this process, the investigated company can refuse Commission officials a cursory review of the disputed materials if it considers that such a review could reveal the content of the documents for which privilege is claimed. Such refusal must, however, be reasoned. If the officials are not convinced by these explanations, they can proceed to place the disputed documents in a sealed envelope which they can take back to Brussels. The placing of the documents in an envelope does not, however, release the Commission from its obligation to issue a decision requesting the documents. In the light of these principles, the CFI concluded that the Commission had acted in breach of the mandatory procedure by making a cursory review of the documents against the wishes of Akzo, and by reading the Set B documents before the adoption of a formal decision.

1 Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Joined Cases T-125/03 & T-253/03, Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v. Commission of the European Communities, 17 September 2007.

2 Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case 155/79, AM & S v. Commission of the European Communities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.