UK: Human Capital (Employment) - Silent Witness

Last Updated: 24 October 2007
Article by David Whincup

Where an employer is tipped off by an informant about a possible malingerer and does not subsequently rely on that information (relying, for example, on medical/ video evidence instead) there is no obligation to take a statement from the informant. Furthermore, it is not necessary to obtain a report on the alleged malingerer from a Consultant – an occupational health physician will suffice. These were the key findings in the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case of Corus UK Ltd v Mainwaring.

Mr Mainwaring was employed by Corus as a crane driver for over 30 years and in 2002 began to suffer from back problems which he said caused him to be absent from work. He was absent for 137 days in 2002 and a further 100 days during 2005.

In late January 2006, Mainwaring was again absent from work due to his back condition and was being paid sick pay by Corus. Mainwaring went to see his GP who prescribed medication and physiotherapy. He was also advised to keep active and perform normal duties as pain permitted and to avoid heavy lifting and sitting in one place for long periods, the latter obviously an integral part of being a crane driver.

Mainwaring also regularly saw Corus’ Occupational Health Advisor, a GP named Dr Bevan. He saw Dr Bevan twice in March 2006 and on the second occasion, Dr Bevan was of the opinion that Mainwaring’s condition had improved to such an extent that, although he was not yet fit for work, he would be able to return to light duties two weeks later.

In early March 2006 Corus received a tip-off from a colleague of Mainwaring’s suggesting that his behaviour outside work may be inconsistent with his being genuinely off work for back problems. Corus did not take a witness statement from the informant but did decide to undertake surveillance of Mainwaring. The surveillance video footage, taken on three dates in March 2006 (including two dates when Mainwaring had been to see Dr Bevan), showed Mainwaring loading shopping into the boot of his car in a supermarket car park, walking along a street having been to a betting office and unloading shopping from his car at home.

Corus subsequently sought Dr Bevan’s opinion on the video footage. Dr Bevan’s report concluded that had Mainwaring informed him on the dates that he saw him in March that he was capable of undertaking the tasks shown in the video footage, he would have recommended that Mainwaring was fully fit for work with immediate effect. Dr Bevan’s report and the video footage were then shown to Mainwaring and his union representatives. Mainwaring was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. He was subsequently dismissed on the grounds that he had dishonestly reported himself as unable to work through illness when he was in fact fit to work.

Tribunal’s Findings

Mainwaring’s subsequent unfair dismissal claim was upheld by the Employment Tribunal. Section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that in order for a dismissal to be fair, the employer must have acted within the range of reasonable responses in coming to its decision to dismiss the employee concerned. In its findings, the Tribunal held that it was outside the range of reasonable responses for Corus not to have taken a statement, even on an anonymous basis, from the person who provided the initial tip-off. In the Tribunal’s opinion, Corus should have done this in order to establish whether or not there was a reason why the complaint had been made. For example, were there sour grapes, was there ill feeling or some other factor influencing the informant’s evidence? The Tribunal also found that Corus had acted outside the range of reasonable responses in not obtaining the advice of a Consultant where the only medical evidence relied upon was from the GP and not a specialist back doctor.

The Appeal

Corus appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on a number of grounds, including the two findings mentioned above. It submitted that the failure to obtain a statement from the informant was irrelevant and also that the Tribunal had made a mistake in holding that Corus’ decision not to seek a report from a Consultant was outside the range of reasonable responses.

Should Corus Have Obtained A Statement?

At the EAT hearing, Corus sought to argue that it did not ultimately rely on anything that was said by the informant in deciding to dismiss Mainwaring and that the decision to dismiss him was based solely upon the surveillance video footage and Dr Bevan’s medical opinions given in light of that footage.

The EAT agreed with Corus. In its opinion, whatever the informant said was not part of any investigation; it triggered the investigation. The EAT found that the information provided was not included in the investigation and there was no evidence that Corus had relied upon it. As a result, the lack of a statement from the informant was not relevant to the reasonableness of the investigation or Corus’ conclusion and decision to dismiss.

The EAT did point out, however, that had the information in the tip-off not been merely a trigger for the findings but also a contributing factor to them, then it would have been unsupported evidence (and therefore of reduced value). It would have remained open to Corus to argue that even if that unsupported evidence was not of itself reliable, all the other evidence which Mainwaring had had a chance to challenge was so conclusive that that weakness in one area should not affect the outcome. To argue to the contrary would be to assert that whether you should get away with misconduct should depend on how the employer found out about it rather than whether you were guilty of it, a most unattractive contention (though clearly not beyond Mr Mainwaring).

Should Corus Have Involved A Consultant?

In considering this issue, the EAT sought to make the distinction between a personal injuries claim of substance where forensic examination on Mainwaring would probably require consideration by a Consultant, and internal disciplinary proceedings where it could not be said that no reasonable employer could choose to dispense with a Consultant’s report where it had sought and obtained the advice of an independent occupational health physician. The relevant question was one of reasonable belief – did the GP’s input (plus the video footage) allow Corus to conclude reasonably that Mainwaring was guilty as charged? If so, there was no need to investigate further.

The EAT also found in Corus’ favour on a number of the other appeal points and the case was sent back to a different Tribunal to be re-heard on those other issues.

What Does The Decision Mean For Employers?

The EAT’s decision has a number of implications for employers faced with a tip-off from an employee wishing to remain anonymous.

If the information received anonymously is not used in a subsequent investigation, there is no need to interview the informant (if identifiable) and take a witness statement. However, if the employer wishes to rely on the tip-off information and it is potentially part of a subsequent decision to dismiss, a witness statement should be taken, on an anonymous basis to protect the identify of the informant, if need be.

If statements are provided anonymously, the 1989 EAT case of Linfood Cash and Carry Limited v Thomson sets out a number of guidelines for employers to follow, including:

  • the employee under investigation should be given as much information as possible of the incident alleged and of whether the informant had any reason to fabricate the evidence;
  • the employee should be given copies of the anonymous witness statements (edited if necessary); and
  • the manager responsible for the disciplinary hearing should interview the informant personally and decide how much weight is to be given to that evidence, ideally making a note as to his/her reasoning.

Judging whether and how to preserve the anonymity of a witness will always be a balancing act and will depend on the particular circumstances. In the 2004 case of Ramsey and Others v Walkers Snack Foods Limited, for example, because of the close-knit community which operated in the workplace and the real risk of reprisals, the EAT held that it was acceptable for the anonymous witness statement to lack identifying detail and that, on the facts, it was reasonable for the anonymity to be extended so that neither the manager involved in the investigation nor the one carrying out the dismissal could test the veracity of the informant’s statements.

Notwithstanding the EAT’s decision in the Corus case best practice would seem to be, wherever possible, to obtain a written statement (anonymous or otherwise) from the informant, and supply this to the "accused" before the disciplinary meeting.

Whilst employers can take some comfort from the fact that the EAT found that Corus had not acted unreasonably in not obtaining medical evidence from a Consultant, the EAT’s finding should not be taken so as to give employers carte blanche to restrict their medical enquiries to occupational health physicians. There may be circumstances, even when the medical evidence relates purely to an internal investigation, where it is appropriate to seek evidence from a specialist. The decision whether or not to do so will depend on the facts. A sensible note of the employer’s reasoning on the point will serve it well in case of later challenge.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.