UK: Binding Authorities: Insurersí Injunctions Against Coverholders

Last Updated: 5 September 2007
Article by Jonathan Thorpe and Stephen Netherway

A recent Commercial Court decision highlights the difficulties insurers face when applying for an injunction against coverholders. Insurers should not assume that such relief will be granted as of right.

In this recent case, the insurer sought to restrain its coverholder from handling the run off of ATE legal expenses insurance under a binding authority the insurer had purported to terminate.

The Judge refused to grant the injunction sought. In particular, he held that the coverholderís business interests in running off the covers precluded the insurer from obtaining this injunction. In contrast, the insurerís interests could be protected by an award of damages at the main trial.

In addition, he also concluded that ordering the injunction would place the coverholder in breach of authorised sub-delegated authority agreements (and the other party to those agreements also in breach), and would place policyholders in a difficult position. These were further reasons which weighed against against granting the injunction.

To view the article in full, please see below:


Full Article

A recent Commercial Court decision highlights the difficulties insurers face when applying for an injunction against coverholders. Insurers should not assume that such relief will be granted as of right.

In this recent case, the insurer sought to restrain its coverholder from handling the run off of ATE legal expenses insurance under a binding authority the insurer had purported to terminate.

The Judge refused to grant the injunction sought. In particular, he held that the coverholderís business interests in running off the covers precluded the insurer from obtaining this injunction. In contrast, the insurerís interests could be protected by an award of damages at the main trial.

In addition, he also concluded that ordering the injunction would place the coverholder in breach of authorised sub-delegated authority agreements (and the other party to those agreements also in breach), and would place policyholders in a difficult position. These were further reasons which weighed against against granting the injunction.

It is often thought by insurers who delegate authority to agents that it is easy to obtain injunctive relief restraining those agents from continuing to act for them if the agent is in breach of the delegated authority agreement. This cannot be assumed to be the case. If an insurer seeks an injunction, there are difficult hurdles it must overcome. This has been highlighted recently by the court in Europ Assistance Insurance Ltd v Temple Legal Protection Ltd.

The Facts

The claimant insurer (Europ) delegated binding authority to the defendant (Temple). The authority delegated was broad: Temple was authorised to underwrite ATE legal expenses insurance, to process and settle claims and to calculate and collect premiums. It was also permitted to sub-delegate its authority to others. This it did by way of sub-delegation agreements, largely to firms of solicitors who were acting for claimants in personal injury litigation. Under these sub-delegation agreements the sub-delegatees were authorised to bind insurance. Europ was not a party to these sub-delegation agreements. Rather, Temple entered them as principal.

The sub-delegation agreements required, amongst other things, the submission of monthly bordereaux and claims information to Temple, and required Temple to administer all claims and make payments due to the insureds. Temple received commission on the net premium. The premiums payable by policyholders were adjusted according to the stage at which a claim was disposed of and were generally payable only upon disposal of the claim.

Europ alleged various breaches of duty on the part of Temple. These included unauthorised retention of commission, failure to account for premium and failure to collect premium from coverholders. Europ purported to terminate Templeís authority to act for it in any way, including the run off of covers already issued. Europ also wrote to the sub-delegatees, requiring them to provide to Europ the monthly bordereaux and claims information, and to account to it for premium. Both of these requirements were contrary to the sub-delegation agreements.

Temple disputed Europís entitlement to terminate but accepted Europís unlawful repudiation as bringing the binding authorities to an end. It alleged, however, that it was entitled (indeed required) to administer the run off of those unexpired covers issued under the binding authority. Temple also wrote to sub-delegatees asking them to honour the sub-delegation agreements, rather than follow Europís requirements. In response, Europ sought to restrict by way of an interim injunction Templeís ongoing operation of the sub-delegation agreements, and its collection of premiums and payment of claims. Europ alleged that it had lost all trust and confidence in Temple to administer and monitor the policies.

The Decision

The Judge refused to exercise his discretion to grant Europ the injunction sought. The reasoning behind this decision is interesting.

Commentary

The first point to note is that any insurer seeking an injunction must show that the conduct it is seeking to restrict would entitle the insurer to claim against the coverholder. The fact that the insurer has an existing claim against the coverholder for a previous breach of duty will not of itself allow the insurer to obtain an injunction restricting future conduct. The insurer must show that there is a serious case to be tried: unsurprisingly, at the interim stage, the court is not always prepared to conduct a trial within a trial to assess the relative merits of the insurerís case on the one hand, and the coverholderís case on the other. In this particular case, the Judge was clearly not impressed with the claims which formed the basis of Europís application.

The Judge then proceeded to consider the relevant factors to be weighed up in deciding whether or not to grant the injunction. This involves the court assessing firstly whether or not damages would be an adequate remedy in the event that it succeeded at trial with its claims on which the application is based. Secondly, and only if the answer to the first question is no, the court must then consider whether or not damages would be an adequate remedy to the respondent in the event the applicant did not succeed at trial on the claims on which the application is based.

In this case, the Judge concluded that:

  1. if Temple was to cause loss to Europ through breach of duty in its claims handling or accounting for monies, this could be compensated by damages;
  2. on the other hand, Temple could not adequately be compensated by damages if the injunction was granted but then Europ did not succeed on the relevant claims at trial. The Judge concluded that the "business" was Templeís business. Temple had built up the relationships with the solicitors who were sub-delegatees. Europ had no relationship with these sub-delegatees. If the interim injunction was granted, the Judge concluded that there was a real risk of damage to Templeís business. This damage would be difficult to prove and to quantify. So would the impact of the loss of cash flow to Templeís business.

This contrasts with the often held view in the market when an insurerís relationship with its coverholder breaks down. In those circumstances, insurers will focus on the need to protect their reputation. It is often assumed that this will trump any concerns of coverholders. But frequently, the coverholder also has a reputation to protect. In this case there does not appear to have been any suggestion that policyholders would not be protected and the Judge has clearly considered as paramount the risk of damage to the business of the coverholder which could not be compensated by damages. One would expect the position to be different where there was shown to be a real risk of damage to insurer - in particular where its name appears on the policies as underwriter and there was a real risk of claims brought by policyholders being unpaid.

In addition, the Judge pointed to a number of further factors which militated against granting Europís injunction. Of particular interest was the fact that if the injunction was granted, then:

  1. both Temple and the sub-delegatees would be placed in breach of the sub-delegation agreements; and
  2. policyholders would have a claim against Temple and would be placed in an invidious position since the policies stated that claims notification should be made to Temple, who were also identified as the insurer "on behalf of [Europ]", rather than Europ.

In contrast, the Judge considered that Europís concerns were capable of being addressed by requiring Temple to continue to provide bordereaux, to maintain a separate bank account for premiums and claims and through Europís rights to audit and inspect Templeís records.

This raises the possibility that the insurerís right to an injunction may be restricted where granting it would put the coverholder in breach of (at least an authorised) sub-delegation agreement or where it would cause other problems further down the insurance chain. The Judge treated these as additional factors, and they are not, in our view, factors which overrides other concerns. In particular, the key question will always be: can the parties be adequately compensated by damages?

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 04/09/2007.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think youíve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.comís content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltdís services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) Ė meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with ďno disclosureĒ in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a userís hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friendís name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our usersí information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a userís personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that userís personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the ďYour ProfileĒ page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.